September 25, 2007 2:10 PM PDT

PE is good for SEO

by Stephan Spencer
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

No, I'm not talking about running laps or playing dodgeball...although a dodgeball challenge of white-hat vs. black-hat SEOers is certainly something to get the adrenaline pumping. The PE here is progressive enhancement, the better looking sibling of graceful degradation.

Progressive enhancement and graceful degradation are common topics in design and accessibility circles, but these are just as important to SEO as well. These techniques are often used along with advanced technologies like JavaScript, Ajax and Flash, but are even applicable to basics like application of CSS.

Let's start with some basics...using neither of these means that visitors or search engines may come to your Web site and see "garbage" or blank pages--not a good presentation and akin to slamming the door in someone's face.

Graceful degradation was a step to overcome this, where sites were designed for the latest browsers and technology, but were also made to degrade gracefully, hopefully delivering most of the content to the visitor, or at least informing the visitor that he or she may not be "getting" everything. This was meant to make for a nicer, friendlier Web experience. An overly simple example is the use of noscript tags for JavaScript functions to at least inform the visitor that JavaScript was necessary, rather than leaving the person clicking on something with no result, or whatever effect that apparently wasn't working.

Graceful degradation might be seen as being focused more on the developer than the end user. Progressive enhancement though is the opposite, developing for the lowest-common-denominator, and then progressively building on top of that. PE has delivery of content at the forefront, with presentation and the bells and whistles as added enhancements.

So why is PE so good for SEO? Well, simply put, search engines are rather limited in their abilities. Sure, they may have patents to their names, highly complex algorithms directing them, supported by multimillion-dollar data centers and the most advanced computing technology, all backed by Ph.D.s in various flavors and more engineers than us average folk could ever imagine, but their spiders are pretty much limited to following simple HTML links from page to page.

Without progressive enhancement, many sites add lots of great interactive functionality at the expense of cutting search engines off from the rich content on the pages. Maybe the best way to really understand this is through a live example.

REI progressive enhancement on product detail pages.

REI progressive enhancement.

(Credit: REI)
REI tabbed content sections on product detail pages.

REI tabbed content sections.

(Credit: REI)

REI, one of Netconcepts clients, is probably familiar to most readers. With stores all across the country and an extensive Web presence, most of us can't help but think of REI whenever we are in need of new outdoor gear or clothing. Online retailers face some of the most challenging SEO issues. Major e-commerce sites often contain hundreds of thousands of product pages below layer upon layer of category pages. Unfortunately, more times than not, these product pages, the ideal pages for serving up highly targeted, keyword-rich content to search engines, are content lean, with little more than a few product bullet points.

Adding to the challenge, thanks to all the focus on adding rich user interfaces using JavaScript, Ajax or Flash, many e-commerce sites have hidden away what little bit of content they had on their product pages.

REI just launched a new design of their product pages. Along with adding even more content to better serve their visitors, they added a tabbed interface to keep the pages cleaner looking and limit the amount of scrolling that users will have to do. Best of all though, they did this through progressive enhancement so that users with older browsers or who for whatever reason may have turned off JavaScript, can still access nearly all of this great content. (The reviews are currently delivered through JavaScript.) And yes, search engine spiders are still able to access this content as well.

The image to the right shows how the page would appear with JavaScript off and the tabbed content revealed and nearly all of it accessible to search engine spiders. You can take a look at the product page for the Hobitat tent and see how much content is on the page in the tabs.

Originally posted at Searchlight
Stephan Spencer is the founder and president of Netconcepts, a Web agency specializing in e-commerce optimized for search engines. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by troymckinnon May 19, 2008 11:37 AM PDT
I was researching layered/tabbed content on the web and came across your article.

We are debating on shortening our pages using TABS similar to what you did for REI. We are concerned it will hurt our SEO.

We are debating 3 concepts:
1) Leaving the pages long with all the content displayed
2) Tabbed display with the contents sectioned into layers which are hidden until 'clicked on' by user, via css.
3) Tabbed display with each tab linking to a new page with the applicable section of content. This would provide also increase the number of pages (unique urls and content) in the site, but I am not sure it is a good user experience. Also, not sure how google would 'feel' about it since some of the page would be 'duplicated'.

Troy
Reply to this comment
by mrpetesurfs October 19, 2008 10:22 AM PDT
I agree, but disagree. I understand that ranking is hard on some engines, but the key is good solid real info on your website, you don't have to be number one, number 10 gets traffic too.

http://www.pr-interactive.com
Reply to this comment
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right