• On CBSSports.com: Mike Tyson's daughter dies in accident
September 5, 2007 9:41 AM PDT

More money for fusion energy

by Michael Kanellos

Canada's General Fusion has received $1.2 million in venture funding to conduct further research on its fusion reactors, according to VentureWire.

The company's ultimate plan is to build small fusion reactors that can produce around 100 megawatts of power. The plants would cost around $50 million. That could allow the company to generate electricity at about 4 cents per kilowatt hour, relatively low. (By contrast, roughly $250 million was spent on a 64-megawatt solar thermal plant in Las Vegas recently.)

General Fusion has adopted the Magnetized Target Fusion (MTF) model. In this scenario, an electric current is generated in a conductive cavity containing lithium and a plasma. The electric current produces a magnetic field and the cavity is collapsed, which results in a massive temperature spike.

The lithium breaks down into helium and tritium. Tritium, an unstable form of hydrogen, is separated and then mixed with deuterium, another form of hydrogen. The two fuse and make helium, a reaction that releases energy that can be harvested. So in short, lithium, a fairly inexpensive and plentiful metal, gets converted to helium in a reaction that generates lots of power and leaves only a harmless gas as a byproduct.

In theory. Conducting those reactions isn't easy. MTF has an advantage over other fusion techniques in that the plasma only has to stay at thermonuclear temperatures (150 million degrees Celsius) for a microsecond for a reaction to occur, according to the General Fusion's Web site.

But research is still ongoing. Los Alamos National Labs is currently conducting research.

Millions have been invested in fusion and nuclear projects over the last decade. Recently, Tri-Alpha Energy, out of the University of California Irvine, landed $40 million in VC funds.

Recent posts from News Blog
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Was InfoWorld's CTO of the Year award a year late?
VMWare VI4 renamed to vSphere
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
Something is wrong with the numbers...
by jsargent September 17, 2007 4:27 AM PDT
The cost and funding looks ridiculously low. $50mill for a nuclear power station. I think not and only $1.2mill funding again this must be a mistake.
Reply to this comment
understated
by Capt. Canada February 8, 2008 4:53 PM PST
i think they have skipped over certain things. its quite possible for the facility to cost 50 million but only after every aspect of it had been designed and the 50 mil was going towards simply duplicating prefab components. initially your right it would cost tons more than that to produce a station. the article was obviously quickly written and/or poorly thought out. as for the 1.2 million in funding, thats just how much a recent venture capitalist has invested there is no way a company is running on measly funds like that. im sure they have received funding from other institutions and the Canadian government.
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right