• On The Insider: Judge Bans Real Housewives Sex Tape
August 30, 2007 2:17 PM PDT

Cell carriers fined over missed e911 deadlines

by Anne Broache

Federal regulators late on Thursday slapped three wireless firms, including No. 3 operator Sprint Nextel, with a total of $2.83 million in fines for not meeting a long-passed deadline for equipping subscribers with enhanced 911 service.

The Federal Communications Commission had set a December 31, 2005 date by which all mobile carriers had to ensure that 95 percent of their subscribers had location-sensitive handsets--that is, those that allow emergency responders to pinpoint a caller's location upon connection to the 911 switchboard.

Sprint Nextel and large regional operators Alltel Corp. and U.S. Cellular Corp. "failed to meet this critical deadline by a significant margin, despite the clear requirements of the commission and the needs of their consumers," FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said in a statement (PDF).

In fact, Sprint Nextel recorded only an 81 percent penetration rate and, according to the FCC, still has not reached the required levels. It was hit with the largest fine, at $1.33 million.

Alltel, which admitted it had reached a penetration rate of only 84 percent by the deadline and did not achieve the target until 17 months later, received a $1 million fine. U.S. Cellular, which reported about an 89 percent penetration rate as of the deadline and reached full compliance eight months later, was ordered to pay $500,000. Each of the companies had applied for deadline waivers but had their petitions denied in January of this year.

Martin said he considers "facilitating the ability of the public safety community to help those in need" among his agency's highest priorities and said enforcement actions like Thursday's are "a valuable and necessary tool in achieving this mission."

Each of the companies now has 30 days in which to pay up or to petition for the fee to be reduced--or dropped entirely.

Update at 3:05 p.m. PDT: Apparently, compliance with the FCC's rules relies in part on the ability of wireless carriers to force their subscribers--through incentives and otherwise--to switch to compatible phones, which has drawn reservations in the past from the wireless industry.

Alltel spokesman Andrew Moreau said his company "took extraordinary measures to convince our customers to swap phones, (but) many just didn't want to make the change. We believe the FCC's timetable for compliance may have underestimated customers' willingness to exchange phones." He declined to comment specifically on the FCC order because the company was still reviewing it.

Sprint Nextel spokeswoman Stephanie Walsh said her firm has faced an extra setback. In July 2004, a "software glitch" rendered the location-tracking capabilities useless in 4.7 million Motorola handsets using then-Nextel's iDEN network. The pre-merger Sprint CDMA network, she added, was poised to be the first carrier to reach the 95 percent mark.

Right now, the carrier has reached 94.7 percent compliance, Walsh said, but she declined to comment specifically on what the company plans to do about the fine, except to "recognize" it has been levied. She also said that no other wireless carrier met the December 31, 2005 deadline--although she acknowledged her company was "farther behind" than the others.

U.S. Cellular representatives did not respond immediately to requests for comment.

advertisement
Click here!
Recent posts from News Blog
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Was InfoWorld's CTO of the Year award a year late?
VMWare VI4 renamed to vSphere
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
If the problem is with changing phones
by Leria August 30, 2007 11:58 PM PDT
And people do not want to do that..... simply make it mandatory for them to switch phones or their service will stop working! Simply stop supporting the older phones that cannot do this E911 on your network, and you will force the lazy laggarts to switch phones.
Reply to this comment
bad service
by bobcode August 31, 2007 12:05 AM PDT
Cutting off service is bad for the customer. And that could happen at the worst possible moment. Besides, 911 is supposed to work regardless the service plan, so that shouldn't be cut off, so the plan is defeated.
But..
by SeizeCTRL August 31, 2007 5:12 AM PDT
Does this really have to do with e911 or is it a way for us to be tagged and tracked?

To me it's one of those things where they bait you with the safety feature like "what if you were in a car wreck and needed 911 to find you" without telling you that you essentially become no different than animals tagged with tracking devices and monitored like some wildlife show.

Maybe I'm just being paranoid???
View reply
notifications
by Michael00360 September 1, 2007 5:53 AM PDT
I don't remember getting a notification from Altell about the cell phone change. I've had mine for about 3 years now so I would think that I would have gotten a notification. Also, some people have very old phones (such as the brick phone) and they don't want to give it up.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Can RIM get its mojo back?

The new BlackBerry Tour, carried by Verizon and Sprint, arrives Sunday, even as RIM seems to be losing sales to exclusive devices like the iPhone and Pre.

With Chrome, Google reignites the OS wars

roundup Google Chrome OS, due in 2010, underscores the Web giant's cloud-computing ambitions and opens new competition with Microsoft.
• What Chrome OS has on Windows that Linux doesn't

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right