Volvo C30 to get 52 mpg
The Volvo C30 Efficiency is expected to get about 52 mpg.
(Credit: Volvo Car Corporation)Looks like the 2008 C30 from Volvo will offer more to entice young consumers than just an impressive sound system, a hatchback with room for Ikea packages and a wonderfully quirky Web site.
Volvo announced Monday that an "Efficiency" version of the 2008 C30 with a 1.6-liter turbo diesel engine will get about 4.5 liters/100 km (52 mpg).
Additionally, Volvo said that its Volvo C30, S40 and V50 with the 2-liter turbo diesel engine will have a new "Powershift" gearbox that will reduce overall fuel consumption by about 8 percent.
The Volvo C30 was originally announced at the 2006 Paris Auto Show and is anticipated to be a rival for young consumers against Audi's A3 and BMW's Mini, Mini Cooper Clubman and 1-series models.
In a software-driven world, it's easy to forget about the nuts and bolts. Whether it's cars, robots, personal gadgetry or industrial machines, Candace Lombardi examines the moving parts that keep our world rotating. A journalist who divides her time between the United States and the United Kingdom, Lombardi has written about technology for the sites of The New York Times, CNET, USA Today, MSN, ZDNet, Silicon.com, and GameSpot. E-mail her at candacelombardi@gmail.com. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET. 




yay!
working your way around the front, down the passenger side you're
totally in awe... Until you stand directly behind one...
YUUUCKKKK...!!!! *** were the designers thinking..?!?! That's
exactly how I saw the C30 for the first time on display in a Mall. I'm
thinking, yes, I want this car... (till I got to the rear) OUT OF MY
SIGHT...!!!!
- by RyleeROBERTS September 8, 2008 6:52 PM PDT
- The C30 isn't for people with kids. It's a different kind of a Volvo for a different kind of customer." In other words, the C30 isn't meant to be an A-to-B appliance for the Smiths or Joneses, but rather a Gen-Y plaything for Junior. More info onVolkswagen Blog...
- Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)