• On BNET: Vote: How will Apple blow it?
July 19, 2007 6:13 PM PDT

Ask to allow anonymous Web search

by Elinor Mills

Search site Ask is launching a new tool that will let people search the Web anonymously, the first major search engine to offer that functionality.

By using the new AskEraser tool, users will be able to set their privacy preferences so the search engine doesn't retain their Web search history. Users will be able to see what the privacy setting is on the search results pages.

AskEraser is expected to be deployed on Ask.com in the U.S. and United Kingdom by the end of the year, and globally early next year.

For people who don't want to search anonymously, Ask will maintain the user search data for 18 months and then it will disassociate the search history from the IP address or cookie information. Cookies are small files stored on a computer so that the computer can be recognized when it revisits Web sites, enabling the site to remember the user's preferences for things like e-commerce and sites that require log-in.

"We'll have no way of figuring out how to associate the searches with a (particular) person," said Doug Leeds, head of development at Ask. "There will be no way for us to receive an IP address from a governmental agency and figure out what searches were done by that IP address."

The move by Ask, a wholly owned business of IAC, follows but exceeds steps taken by Google. Earlier this week, Google said it would set cookies on Web searches to expire after two years instead of in 2038. In practice, however, only a minuscule number of people will be affected by the change because if you visit Google even once in the next two years, the cookie will be renewed for another two years.

In March, Google said it would start anonymizing the final eight bits of the IP address and the cookie data after somewhere between 18 months and 24 months, unless legally required to retain the data for longer. Doing so effectively would enable someone to narrow the IP address down to 256 possible computers or users. That would be similar to obscuring the last digit in someone's street address.

The risks associated with Web search data were highlighted last August when AOL inadvertently exposed on the Internet the search history of more than 650,000 of its users.

Microsoft and Yahoo are also expected to improve their Web search privacy practices, according to the Financial Times.

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
you can use Tor network
by dondarko July 19, 2007 8:48 PM PDT
to surf anonymously but it is a bit slower.
Reply to this comment
Nitpicking:
by drpruner July 19, 2007 10:27 PM PDT
Good, useful stories; very little on Paris. :-)

HOWEVER, there is still a place for spellchecking:
"miniscule number of users" reflects an easy-to-make error which software never misses.

BTW I use ask.com almost exclusively and I like the recent improvements, so the story is useful.
Reply to this comment
thanks, fixing
by meyersm July 20, 2007 9:35 AM PDT
Thanks for pointing out the issue of miniscule vs. minuscule. Merriam-Webster tells us that modern day associations with "mini" have produced miniscule as a spelling variant of minuscule. But, it adds, "This variant dates to the end of the 19th century, and it now occurs commonly in published writing, but it continues to be widely regarded as an error." So we have made the fix.
I'm switching to Ask
by bob donut July 20, 2007 7:56 AM PDT
I value my privacy enough that I don't want Google doing things with my data.

Google made a major mistake with this one. They allowed another search engine to seize the opportunity.

We should all support Ask to make sure that they keep this up.
Reply to this comment
Switch to Ask
by Newspeak finder July 20, 2007 9:09 AM PDT
Well done to Ask.

It will be interesting to see how many people stay with companies
who won't do what they want.
Reply to this comment
Bye Google
by cascadia4 July 22, 2007 12:46 PM PDT
Yep, I'm definitely going to switch to Ask.
Reply to this comment
Ixquick.com
by Robert E.G. Beens July 23, 2007 1:38 PM PDT
Dear reader,

None of this is new to http://ixquick.com. Although a relatively small search engine we are considered the industry leader when it comes to search Privacy. As a rule, we delete our users' IP addresses within 48 hrs and do NOT store any unique user ID cookies.
This has been our practice since June 2006, when we became the world's first search engine to take this pioneering step.

You can find more information on Ixquick and our privacy policy at:
http://us.ixquick.com/eng/protect_privacy.html
http://us.ixquick.com/eng/privacy-policy.html

Please feel free to contact us for additional information.

Sincerely,

Robert E.G. Beens
CEO Ixquick.com
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right