• On TechRepublic: Why VISTA HATERS will love Windows 7
July 5, 2007 10:45 AM PDT

Sprint breaks up with high-maintenance customers

by Marguerite Reardon

The squeaky wheel doesn't always get the grease.

At least not if the squeaky wheel is a Sprint Nextel customer. On June 29, 2007, Sprint sent letters notifying some customers that their service would be canceled by the end of July due to excessive calls to customer service.

"Our records indicate that over the past year, we have received frequent calls from you regarding your billing or other general account information," the letter reads. "While we have worked to resolve your issues and questions to the best of our ability, the number of inquiries you have made to us during this time has led us to determine that we are unable to meet your current wireless needs."

"Therefore after careful consideration, the decision has been made to terminate your wireless service agreement effective July 30, 2007."

Subscribers who have gotten letters from Sprint terminating their service won't have to pay the early termination fee. Their account balances will also be set to zero. But subscribers will have to sign up with a new wireless provider by July 30 if they want to keep their phone numbers. Otherwise, the numbers won't be available after the Sprint service ends, the letter states.

(You can take a look at one of these letters posted within this discussion stream on a Sprint users' forum.) And click here to see an image of one of the letters.

Sprint's new tagline

The company's new tagline: 'Sprint Ahead.'

(Credit: Sprint Nextel)

A Sprint spokeswoman acknowledged that a group of letters had been sent out on June 29. She said that only a "small minority" of customers were impacted.

"We have to be able to quickly and efficiently serve customers," said Roni Singleton, a Sprint spokeswoman. "And when we are unable to consistently solve our customers' problems it results in a lot of frustration and longer waits for other customers. So after looking through our records, we were able to determine that there were customers who we could couldn't meet their current needs."

Singleton said it was normal business practice for Sprint to audit customer service interactions. She also said the company has always reserved the right in its terms of use to terminate the contract for whatever reason.

Posting on the Sprint users' message board, one customer who received one of these letters said the calls she made to Sprint were for errors in the company's billing. She also questioned how the company counted the number of calls.

"I absolutely didn't call as much as they say I did, but I did always have the hang up/transfer scenario--even today calling in I was hung up on twice and transferred at least five times," she said in one of her posts. "I mean I DREAD calling in and sitting on hold, why on earth would I do it unless I had to!"

Clearly, Sprint is trying to shed customers who seem to eat up too many resources. But it seems crazy that a company that's already having a hard time keeping subscribers would be willing terminate contracts.

For years, Sprint has had a reputation for poor customer service and poor network coverage, and as a result, the company is suffering. For the first quarter of 2007, it reported a loss of 220,000 post-paid monthly subscribers--customers who pay monthly. This was the third quarter in a row the company had a substantial loss of these types of customers. The company has consistently had one of the worst churn rates in the wireless industry. At the end of the first quarter of 2007, Sprint reported a churn rate of 2.7 percent.

This issue has gotten me wondering about wireless contracts in general. If you are a Sprint customer who recently received one of these letters, or you've received a similar letter from another carrier, please write me at maggie.reardon@cnet.com.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
advertisement
Click here!
Recent posts from News Blog
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Was InfoWorld's CTO of the Year award a year late?
VMWare VI4 renamed to vSphere
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 6 pages (208 Comments)
Good way to get out of your contract without a fee
by totorototoro July 5, 2007 11:15 AM PDT
Whine? :p

Will this be the new iPhone strategy?
Reply to this comment
interesting idea!
by cary1 July 5, 2007 11:25 AM PDT
this might work...
Heck Yes!
by Penguinisto July 5, 2007 12:12 PM PDT
I seriously hope the rest of the carriers take up the policy under the same conditions...

...that way if I don't like my contract, I merely have to call 'em up about 4-5 times a day with 'problems' (trust me, they can be found easily enough), and *poof* - no more contract or termination fee.

Sweet!
YES
by RagingAura July 5, 2007 3:50 PM PDT
I TOTALLY AGREE.
although they do make some mistakes, nothing serious has happened to our service. i think sprint is an good provider. and please dont try to force your opinions down each others throats (and mine)
View reply
No doubt!
by smithjones July 5, 2007 6:27 PM PDT
I was thinking the same thing. This could have not been better
timing on sprints part. This is a major business faux pas on sprints
part, and opportunity on the consumer side. Hmmmmm, now that
iPhone looks interesting....
Make no mistake - Sprint sending a mesage
by ejevo July 5, 2007 11:39 AM PDT
And the message is: "Don't ask us to provide customer service, or else we'll drop you."

Very nice. Hey, they've got to pay for the millions of $$ they're dropping on NASCAR somehow.
Reply to this comment
Nextel Cup
by murry2k5 July 5, 2007 1:15 PM PDT
When nextel aquired the racing scene in less than 18 months it was making a greater profit that projected.
View reply
You used to have to curse a lot to get 'let go"
by phillynets July 5, 2007 11:40 AM PDT
Sprint is one of those companies that you had to abuse toget somewhere. Turns out if you do it enough they'll dump you.

Lots of companies "fire" customers - some even on purpose. In the old days of Sprint when they had that Girl Voice Customer Service Robot the best way to navigate their voice-recognition system was to curse. If you told her to go F-herself you would get a panicky response and would be expedited through their system.

It was kind of funny. I tested their system a few times and by cursing I always go a human being faster. Of course that didn't always mean you got actual help...

My contract runs out in January - can you fire me?
Reply to this comment
Read the thread
by rom1855 July 5, 2007 11:57 AM PDT
I take it you didn't read the thread. The person involved says many times over that she always spoke to the CSRs in a calm voice and never swore or was otherwise rude.
View reply
Early Termination Fee
by rcarsey July 5, 2007 11:47 AM PDT
I wonder if they'll be receiving a $175 early termination fee.

According to recent news articles about "contracts of adhesion", a customer can challenge the termination fee based on the unfair contract. But I wonder if a customer could argue that the fair thing is to make Spring pay $175, just as Spring would have made the customer pay $175.
Reply to this comment
-
by RagingAura July 5, 2007 3:53 PM PDT
you might jsut be able to do that in the 9th circus *uh i mean circuit* of appeals in california. did you hear about that lesbian suing eHarmoney becuase they denied her access?
No etf
by mrs onion July 11, 2007 8:59 AM PDT
No ETF (early termination fee) is applicable here. In the service agreement that every customer signs @ beginning of service, the service provider reserves the right to, at their discretion, terminate service for whatever reason. It would greatly behoove ALL subscribers to read, in detail, their service agreement. There is a 30 day trial period, which provides more than ample time to read it, and if found not to your liking, to back out of the contract and return the phone.
by wardmd July 2, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
The problem with your argument, is that the cell phone companies are NOT "PAYING" you the fee, they are simply not TAKING the fee (there's a difference).
cancel me! cancel me!
by gkflyboy July 5, 2007 11:56 AM PDT
I wish my cell phone company would cancel me. Then it would be off to the Apple Store... ;)
Reply to this comment
Sprint
by Georgemia July 5, 2007 12:11 PM PDT
I found Sprint's customer service to be punitive, annoying, and
unresponsive. They cut off my phone for "non payment," even
though the check in question had cleared their billing
department.
Their attempts to continue my never-late, multi-year account
were pathetic. Of course, they were more forthcoming AFTER I
signed up with T-mobile.

I would consider such a letter from Sprint a notice of
emancipation. If you have Sprint, start calling and complaining
NOW, to get out of your contract!!
Reply to this comment
Roger That
by SeizeCTRL July 5, 2007 12:36 PM PDT
I may have to start my Campaign of Complaining 2007 now to get out of my Sprint contract.

Their customer service is horrible and completely unhelpful. I had a crazy ex girlfriend who started calling me at all hours of the night, having her friends call and threaten me and all Sprint would say is that I should report it to the police... all I wanted was a block on a number and they wouldn't do that. 5 more months and counting unless I start complaining now :)
View all 5 replies
Smart Buisness-
by murry2k5 July 5, 2007 1:13 PM PDT
If you have never worked in a Customer Call center, then I completly understand the thinking that "this is rude and crazy" but I worked in a Nextel call center for 4 years and this was a great move. There are to many customers out there who think since there is such a competitive communications market, that the company should stop helping other so that they stay on the line untill you give in to their ridiculas demands. And you can check into the contracts with a fine toothed comb, the provider reserves the right to term the contract at anytime for any reason. And yes it actually says that.

It's 2007 and the customer hasnt been right for a long time.
Reply to this comment
Agreed!
by witib03 July 5, 2007 1:33 PM PDT
The previous comment was from a guy who worked a call center! I agree completely and this is coming from the store level. There are just some people you wish to get rid of. Its the person that comes in and complains about the bill every month AND wants a new phone every two months. I have no idea how much money the company lost dealing with these types of customers, but I can tell you in the long run this was a good idea!

Say what you will about Sprint, its the same freaking service as all the rest! Every single carrier has black spots where the phones don't work. If your complaining about your cell phone not working in a particular spot, feel free to collect trillions of dollars and build your own network! Remember it wasn't more than 15 years ago, the general, average public didn't have cell phones!
View all 3 replies
Yes and No
by Renegade Knight July 5, 2007 2:17 PM PDT
If the customer is a PITA. Then yes, dump them.

However if Sprint created the issues...Stupid Stupid, Stupid.

Take T-Mobile. I just signed up.
They said my phone would connect by USB so I could download Photo's Correct. Nope. Call #1.
I signed up for Unlimited Texting and Turning off all other services that I could sign up for. My first bill didn't show that. Call #2.
They gave me phone numbers that had nothing to do with my state. Call #3.
They said "Port your number after you decide you want to keep the service". Call #4.
They fixed my out of state number with a non local number. Call #6.
They said "We can't tell if a number is local, we only match your area code...but this prefix looks local but we can't tell...Um.. Great. Call #1 for Qwest to verify the prefix for my local calling area. Call #6 to T-Mobile to get a new number.
Call #7. SPAM, Telemarking, and other annoying calls to my new T-Mobile Number. Defered because they wanted me to document the calls. Meanwhile I did not yet know my "Local#" wasn't local yet. Deferring the solution to a problem only generates more calls.

That's 7 calls so far with 8 total just to get the same account I signed up for to begin with. A simple plan, unlimited texting, and a local cell phone number.
View reply
get a better education
by jb_iphone July 5, 2007 2:50 PM PDT
I hope you are still in school or that you found a better job. Call
center jobs are moving to foriegn countries at a rapid rate. I
would suggest that you move to a job that is far away from
customers because you seem jaded. Many of my friends did not
switch to AT&T because t-mobile has been so good to them. I
will not leave AT&T because one time I thought I needed a new
phone but one of there employees showed me all I needed was
a free updated sim card. Customer service is not gone it never
existed at sprint. They were my prior carrier to cingular now at&t.
Sprint had a i don't care attitude 3 years ago and they have not
changed.
Call Center
by downshift July 10, 2007 7:04 AM PDT
.......and working in a call center you were just as abused as the customers calling in. Call Centers are all alike!
your kidding right?
by crusadex July 12, 2007 5:06 AM PDT
I'd fire your ass in a minute.Your exactly the reason Sprint has such a terrible rep.
Got a name,I will send it in a letter to Sprint about how you respect your customers.
But if you have any questions.........
by Radio1030 July 5, 2007 1:20 PM PDT
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that they send a letter telling you your service is being canceled for exccess calls to customer service, then end it by saying if you have any questions......call customer service!
Reply to this comment
The story is incomplete and lacks context
by 1Neutronbeam July 5, 2007 1:22 PM PDT
So what are the churn rates for the other wireless carriers, Ms. Reardon? How do THEY compare? Also, last time I checked, Sprint may have the best high-speed network coverage in the country--Maximum PC magazine made that point two issues ago, and it didn't use the qualifier "may," it said Sprint has the best high-speed network. Stories lacking context appear to be biased and poorly researched--that's not a high journalistic hurdle to meet--it's a basic one, and this story doesn't meet it.
Reply to this comment
Typical
by MadKiwi July 5, 2007 1:29 PM PDT
This story is fairly typical of the journalistic standard at c|net which ranges from incomplete to outright bias.

While I read many c|net articles I take them with an extremely large grain of salt.

Perhaps it would help to think of them more at the journalistic level of gossip magizines...
So I guess you work for Sprint?
by nhidealist July 5, 2007 1:34 PM PDT
I am a former Sprint customer, and everything here and elsewhere about Sprint's dreadful, vicious, hostile customer service is true; I lived a nightmare with Sprint for two years due to THEIR errors.

First, an account was opened in my name with Sprint - not by me. An activation fee was charged, but as Sprint later admitted to me, no phone was ever issued, no calls were ever made, and no charges were incurred after their activation.

When I received invoices with a zero amount, I called and said there must be a mistake etc. Never got anywhere (when I wasn't getting hung up on). I was told the account could not be closed due to unnamed system reasons. Then, a couple of months later, I started getting harassing calls from a collection agency!

I explained to the collection agency again and again what had happened, that Sprint said no usage occurred etc., and the agency said (understandably) they couldn't stop calling me on my say-so; Sprint had to call them off.

So I called Sprint again and again; Sprint told me (I swear I am not making this up) that, once launched, they could not call their collection agencies back until the collection agency collected.

It took me TWO YEARS to finally get Sprint to admit that it was all their mistake, completely their fault, and to get them to close this account and call off the collectors. In that time, I must have called them many dozens of times.

So when people here and elsewhere say they don't call Sprint for fun, and call back because they're always getting disconnected - I've been there with that hellsnarl of a company. I never had any beef with them until that, but the total hostility toward me because of THEIR system glitch is something I have never experienced with any of the other carriers, and through the years I have been with almost all of the major ones.

So why don't YOU back off your attacks, and instead of accusing vaguely (ad hominem attack) say for whom you work? Sprint DOES have poor customer systems, it DOES exhibit active hostility toward account-holders, it DOES have high disconnect rates; I've been through it.

NB I am not, and never have been, affiliated with CNET or any related organization.
View reply
Blogger vs. Journalist
by sroussey July 5, 2007 2:17 PM PDT
That's the difference between a Blogger vs. a Journalist. It was clearly labeled as a blog.
I love it!
by jabberwolf July 5, 2007 1:36 PM PDT
Idiots need to get some other service that will deal with them!

But true another very good way to get out of a contract, if you need to jump ship!

I personally have had a good experience with Sprint.
Reply to this comment
Please don't call me an idiot.
by IsLNdbOi July 5, 2007 1:58 PM PDT
No need to call me an idiot. I signed up for the plan because it included unlimited vision and unlimited text messaging. Here they are charging me for the unlimited text messaging when it is supposed to be free with the plan. I have had to call every month to get the charged amount returned to me.

It's ridiculous that they're doing this now especially since AT&T just picked up ~ 700,000 new subscribers this past week.
View reply
Why idiots?
by rom1855 July 5, 2007 1:38 PM PDT
Do you know these people personally? Why call them idiots?
Reply to this comment
Article misleading
by mjm01010101 July 5, 2007 2:19 PM PDT
The image clearly diaplays how SPRINT will pay the customer's fees while terminateing their account. This isn't included in the article text. Don't you think this is a journalistic oversight that is fairly important to the tone of the article?

How about other carriers policies?

Shame, cnet.
Reply to this comment
The story has been updated
by Maggie Reardon July 5, 2007 3:04 PM PDT
Subscribers won't have to pay early termination fees to Sprint. The story has been updated. And you can read the letter by clicking on the link in the story. Stay tuned for a follow up story that looks at this issue in more depth.
Totally irrelevant point to journalistic integrity of article
by hurleysurf101 July 6, 2007 7:47 PM PDT
You're right...the amount they're willing to pay ($150 early termination) would cover 15 hours of whining (assuming customer service reps are paid $10/hour). Now add in the cost of sending out those letters, responding to all of this bad press, losing customers, disillusioning MORE customers, crediting those booted customers' remaining account balances, etc. Hm...I think that the tone of the article displays what's going on just fine, and actually helps Sprint out by not mentioning all of these costs and bad business that Sprint is STUPIDLY incurring.
This is Too Funny!!!!
by Robert337 July 5, 2007 2:32 PM PDT
"the number of inquiries you have made to us during this time has led us to determine..." and
then they close with "...please call our customer care department...." I guess they don't read their own memos...
Reply to this comment
F L U S T E R E D
by spirit.of.sprint October 15, 2007 3:11 PM PDT
I have been reading the comments.. and am begining to feel somewhat better.. I know its not all Sprints or Mirosoft's fault.. but there is no way in .... that you could compensate me for the hell I've been thru trying to get thier products to function together... I guess the answer being they shouldn't be allowed to sell them to dummies like me.... I've been a sprint customer sence mid 90's and have always ,(although more than a bit of a struggle) found a solution.. lately it's been different ... I went from a data card to a phone modem (Sanyo 8400) and mirosoft keeps isolating the drivers .. can't even uninstall to reinstall.. countless hr's on phone.. still recovering the entire sys just have a degree of some function. I just ordered thier new USB card N-727 w/internal chip manager.. if this dosen't work my next post will be even longer. of.sprint
You gotta be kidding
by ittesi259 July 5, 2007 3:13 PM PDT
They told you the correct thing to do. Phone companies can't/won't block a single number from your phone. There is a reason there is a crime called telephone harrasment....and threats over the phone can be termed aggravated assault depending on said threat. Instead of taking responsibility for yourself you complain because someone else won't stop it.
Reply to this comment
Let Sprint Die a Painful Death
by Fuzzylogik July 5, 2007 3:44 PM PDT
I finally got rid of Sprint after they made an error coming to HUNDREDS of dollars right before my wife and I got married (we combined our accounts and screwed up some important info). I spoke with someone, who supposedly corrected the problem and gave me a total that was more in line with what we should have been billed. The next month we were hit with a service charge for the balance that we were NOT credited (but were told was billed in error). Further, they claimed that there was no evidence of the conversation that I had even though I had the name of the rep, the day and even the time of the original conversation. The second rep acknowledged that there had been an error, but was a small fraction of the bill that the original rep had supposedly credited me. There is ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY no personal accountability with Sprint and I will NEVER, EVER deal with them again. May the company rot in hell. (Needless to say, we aren't with Sprint anymore!)
Reply to this comment
A SLOW, painful death!
by rhett121 July 5, 2007 10:03 PM PDT
Well, maybe I'd just like to see them gone already. I too hate
Sprint and as a former customer, would like them to burn in hell!
All of them! They've never even heard of customer service!
Verizon isn't much better though. I actually got so mad at
crapfest Verizon that I threw my phone on the ground and
destroyed it and just payed out the last two months of the
contract while I used a prepaid Cingular phone. Now I've been on
regular Cingular service for about a year and I couldn't be
happier. Well, maybe if they hadn't changed their name to AT&T.
What asshead though it was a good idea to ruin the wonderful
branding of Cingular by changing the name BACK to AT&T,
which had such a horrid reputation, they had to sell the
company just a few years ago.
View all 2 replies
Potential marketing strategy for T-Mobile/AT&T
by Sapper19 July 5, 2007 3:51 PM PDT
Here's a good promotion that the other carriers could try.
"Bring in your letter for a $50 credit"
Or 20% off a new phone or something like that. This might actually help to increase the number of customer service calls to Sprint by people who would like to get out of their contract early. It's a two-fold win for other carriers, attracting new customers while hurting one of their competing companies.
Reply to this comment
The hell with that, I'm gonna start calling T-Mobile
by kribor July 9, 2007 9:20 AM PDT
maybe they'll cancel my contract! Face it, changing carriers is just like changing banks. They all suck, when it comes to service, the only question is which set of headaches are you willing to put up with, the jerks you're with, or one you'll have to get used to ....
Its about time
by ljhunt33 July 5, 2007 4:10 PM PDT
I worked for Sprint for 5 years and all I have to say is its about time.

The people that are calling in are the dumb ***** that cant understand their spending limit. Yeah we gave you a phone and your credit sucks but pay your bill, When you go over your minutes thats effects your spending limit and your phone gets shut off. This is so you dont screw Sprint when you rack up the bill for $1200 and then not pay, then go in the next day and use a different name and pay a $125 deposit.

About time. Good move Sprint, one of the few I have seen on your part.

Leigh
Reply to this comment
Read the thread
by rom1855 July 5, 2007 4:25 PM PDT
Please.
Not nearly soon enough nor enough
by myuan July 5, 2007 4:26 PM PDT
Cool Leigh, I'm glad you find this is about time too but surely it couldn't have come soon enough as defection rise more of you would be redundant as well so it becomes a downward spiral that will be compounded by poorer quality service if any. This is excellent, I just wish more corporations would remove sprint as an option for their employees' wireless needs.
bad move
by janus657 July 6, 2007 10:01 AM PDT
I don't doubt the stupidity of the average human calling in to Sprint Nextel customer service. But the cell phone bills have a tendancy of getting "messed up". Especially when changes are made to the account. Customer service is the customer's only way of correcting legitimate billing errors.

This letter seems to say "just pay it and don't bother us." That is a bad message to send to potential customers. I've been trying to decide between Verizon and Sprint for a little while. This doesn't help Sprint's case no mater how good the data connection service is.
Excellent!
by myuan July 5, 2007 4:23 PM PDT
This is excellent news ~ I can't wait for them to issue the going out of business letter! They deserve all heartaches that they receive. I remember I could have been a loyal customer but the customer service I received at a store near 101 California that I swore NEVER will I step foot into a Sprint store nor use them for any service. I am very much hearten that the years of bad service and the accumulated rep has caught up with them. The only sad part, if it can even be called that, is that Nextel too would be kaput.
Reply to this comment
Kaput!
by downshift July 10, 2007 7:37 AM PDT
Nextel was "kaput" when the merger took place....why else would a major carrier result to such lowly behavior? Nascar sponsorship put a hole in their pocket.
how do I get one?
by sberley July 5, 2007 4:40 PM PDT
while their network is decent; Sprint's customer service amazingly terrible.

in fact, i'm happy when they're rude because its an improvement over their usual nastiness.

How can I sign up for one!
Reply to this comment
Sprint Used to Send Out Hit Squads
by Sumatra-Bosch July 5, 2007 8:44 PM PDT
No kidding. Three or four guys would be waiting in the parking lot at work, jump the customer, beat the crap out of him and then they'd take the phone and sledge it in front of the customer on the parking lot surface.

Sprint management thought the Dear John letter would be cheaper and their employees were complaining about spending their lunch breaks driving around beating people up, some of which were bigger than them.
Reply to this comment
RFLMAO !!!!!
by downshift July 10, 2007 7:39 AM PDT
As a former Nextel customer rep -- sure wish that this was so...........LOL
Showing 1 of 6 pages (208 Comments)

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right