Apple: You can gab on that iPhone for eight hours
(Credit: Apple)According to Apple, you can ditch your fears over the rumor that the iPhone has 45 minutes of talk time. The company announced Monday that the much-anticipated handset will ship with much better battery life than was expected when it was first announced in January. The iPhone will finally be released, as you probably already know, on Friday June 29.
The numbers from Apple? The company had initially anticipated that the iPhone battery would allow five hours of talk time (though rumors around the blogosphere suggested it was actually much less than that), but now Apple is boasting that it'll last a full eight hours with a whopping 250 hours of standby time. Apple is also saying that you'll alternately be able to enjoy six hours of Internet use, seven hours of video playback, or 24 hours of audio playback. That's twice as long as the ultra-efficient iPod Shuffle.

A comparison chart from Apple pitting the iPhone against its rivals.
(Credit: Apple)Additionally, the touch-screen of the iPhone has been upgraded from plastic to optical glass to make it clearer and more scratch-proof. So, with that and the extended battery life, maybe you can take your iPhone on wilderness excursions.
Update at 10:12 a.m. PDT: Whoops! There was an error in Apple's original competitive data chart (above, corrected). The original chart said that the Nokia N95 did not have Wi-Fi capabilities. It, in fact, does.
Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.





With WiFi, I don't have to pay out the arse for some provider's ungodly expensive "data plan" just to get connected (AT&T damned well better not charge to unlock that WiFi lovin', either).
The rest is... well, right there in the chart.
Man, I can't fscking wait.
/P
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7683
Pay me now or pay me later, but either way, iPay.
battery with 3 hours of talk time is actually a bit thinner then the
iphone... though it does have the camera hump though. One, thing
I did notice having had a chance to use the iphone last week is that
it is HEAVY!!! i mean even more so then my beloved 8700c which I
can hold upto my ear for more then a few minutes.
"The rest is... well, right there in the chart" minus a few rows like......
price
3g
Native Exchange compatibility
Hundres of applications that can run on it
the pwnage......goes to "they dont say"?
So $150 Blackjack....or a $499-$599 for a Iphone?
Have fun looking for the those hot spots.
you do understand that these are all different chips, right?
and that the REASON apple switched was because the NEW x86 was faster/more efficient. i don't understand what the problem is here.
Also, you can't fully quantify the performance of a CPU (much less a computer) with just one number. There are way too many things to measure. However, battery capacity can be pretty well quantified with just one number.
What they need to do is hook it up to an online storage device so we can get new iPhones and have all of our data intact.
Until then, I'll keep my peripherals separate. If I lose my phone, I still have my music to keep me company.
I must admit, I've never heard anyone voice support for the logic of separating all your functions out on different devices. But assuming the central device sucks, I guess I see where you're coming from. You do have a windows machine, right?
the computer - iTunes for music, iCal for calendar, AddressBook
for contacts, iPhoto for pictures, etc - so as long as you don't lose
your computer, everything is, in a way, backed up...
http://www.apple.com/iphone/easysetup/getready.html
thank you, dr. hyperbole, for your insight. now i'm going to have my nokia n95 make me a cup of coffee and walk my dog.
terrible for a $700 phone . in a dark room it looks like the
phone is about to bust apart. Lite escapes from every nook and
cranny. I can't believe they actually built it this way, it is terrible.
However, the greates thing on then N95 is that you can use it
with 3.5mm standard headphone jacks. But you have to pay 200
bucks more for it then the iphone and it gets so hot after talking
on it for 15 minutes. The camera is great but the symbian OS
just ruins the photo editing features. Also, it is so slow, like
mollases in january and even worse it doesn't even work on our
3G networks for some reason. Plus the battery life is horrible,
horrible!!!
Is that why everyone I know who runs a show intertainment world
either has an Apple computer or wants one? despite not being
prfect, ( and what company is...) they offer a great deal in terms of
stability and useabilty that Windows users are just plain jealous of.
Correct me if i a wrong!
has all the benefits.
Web browsing for example, is a feature on both phones, but
because it's real web browsing on the iPhone it's a benefit.
Voicemail is a feature on both, but a benefit on the iPhone
because of Visual Voicemail.
Email is a real email client, so it's a benefit on the iPhone... the
list goes on and on...
the number "9" on the virtual keypad continually sticks. Just like
the AppleTV, it will never be hacked. Don't even think that you'll
be able to get your own widgets on board! I hear the battery
will likely explode. Also, it may violate several patents and will
likely be confiscated after you purchase it. It'll probably leave
the toilet seat up too. The iPhone has been known to start coups
d'etat in several small countries... like Rwanda & Burundi. Rumor
has it that Steve Jobs gets paid a 25 cent royalty on every single
TXT message you send AND receive. You'll probably have to pay
an extra $100 a month for a full binary data... the $50 plan only
transmits zeros and receives ones. The screen scratches if you
look at it the wrong way. It will randomly dial your friends at
3AM.
Hopefully everyone will listen to me and I can cruise on into the
AT&T on June 29th and pick up one without waiting! If you want
every feature known to man, buy a Windows Mobile phone, like
my current one. If you want a nicely, but by no means
exhaustively, featured phone that just plain works very well, the
iPhone is probably you're best hope.
account cost? What's the big deal? Do you really think most people
interested in an iPhone don't already have an iTunes account??? 3%
of the people who actually purchase an iPhone will have to create
iTunes accounts because they don't have one yet. Big Deal... Non-
Issue.
Also, who still IMs? OK, all you AOLers put your hands down! You've
made your point! You can still use iPhone's Safari to go to aol.com,
log into your AIM account, and join the 1990s! Don't forget to IM
the Backstreet Boys while you're there!
Have you tried syncing it with Outlook? No? Give us a call when you
quit speculating. My Windows Mobile 5 phone doesn't even sync
with Outlook, at least not reliably. Microsoft's own products seem
to dislike syncing with each other. I'd list this as a "feature" of the
iPhone, not a "fault".
Is anyone afraid of iTunes? I'm sure there is an "iTunes For
Dummies" book out there... or, if you get confused, ask any soccer
mom how she syncs her iPod. iTunes is only used everyday to sync
the millions of iPods out there.
It IS a shame that it there will be no configuration involved... I'm
really going to miss ActiveStync!
- Well, duh
-
by Fochsenhirt
June 19, 2007 11:55 AM PDT
- Of course everyone is speculating. The JesusPhone still hasn't been released. I hope everyone who claims to want a JesusPhone buys one for $600. Then the phones that actually let people do real work will be even cheaper. When it can get push mail from an Exchange server, let me know. Otherwise, I'll keep my Blackjack and nano.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(33 Comments)