Dell apologizes for remove-this-blog-post-or-else nastygram
A blog post at Consumerist.com offering tips on buying from Dell drew a nasty cease-and-desist letter from the company's attorney and then, in quick succession, a chastened apology from a Dell manager.
The original post, titled "22 Confessions Of A Former Dell Sales Manager," appeared last Thursday. The same afternoon, Dell attorney Tracy J. Holland sent a nastygram to Consumerist saying the post must be deleted because "it contains information that is confidential and proprietary to Dell."
The offending post included advice like this: "Thursday is the first day of new promotions. If you go to the web site at 11:45 p.m. on Wednesday night and again on 1 a.m. on Thursday morning, the promotions are different. The catalog promotions run from the start of the month to the end."
That legal threat might have worked a decade ago, but not today. The correspondence was Dugg; it was Slashdotted; it was generally dissected and discussed at length by increasingly irate customers (and potential customers) until Dell was forced to turn tail and apologize.
That happened in a "we goofed" post on Saturday by Lionel Menchaca, Dell's digital media manager. He said: "We blew it... Instead of trying to control information that was made public, we should have simply corrected anything that was inaccurate. We didn't do that, and now we're paying for it." (Dell also offers a community forum.)
What makes this case mildly puzzling is that, based on the information that's been made public so far, Consumerist was under no obligation to delete anything. Journalists routinely obtain "confidential and proprietary information" from sources -- in fact, that kind of material, if it checks out, usually makes for the best stories.
I've written scores, if not hundreds, of stories based on confidential leaked government documents. News.com has broken its share of business stories, including being the first to confirm the highly confidential information that Apple was switching to Intel chips. And in the Bartnicki case, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld journalists' First Amendment right to publish highly confidential information (that they had obtained by breaking no laws).
Expecting our esteemed members of the bar to be familiar with the First Amendment might, it's true, be asking too much. But it's heartening to note that at least Consumerist knows its rights under the law, and stood its ground against unfounded legal threats.
Declan McCullagh, CNET News' chief political correspondent, chronicles the intersection of politics and technology. He has covered politics, technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We oughta have a new federal law against this." E-mail Declan. 






shareholders.
Good shot, and indeed it might. Lawyers seldom "know" much more than the interested, intelligent "man on the street." They are taught how to find the information, though, and certainly have a responsibility to make that effort before jumping to conclusions.
Correctly or not, they are also taught how to argue any side of a question. Therefore, some corporate lawyers think it is their job to automatically support what they perceive as the side of their employer.
The thinking process is time-consuming and therefore not observable any more in the legal profession than in any other.
Also, if there is no consequences for making a blunder, there's no reason to stop making them. i.e. if Mr. Lawyer is going to learn anything, it's going to need to hurt him a bit.
It is just easier for them then having to QC the system, possibly re-package, and then sell as refurbished at a discount to somebody else. Of course as an alternative you could buy a refurbished system from Dell.
People who buy Dells have absolutely no right to complain.
- I don't buy Dell any more.
- by Des Alba June 18, 2007 1:26 PM PDT
- Having owned a couple of Dell PCs in the past, they can keep 'em AND their customer service. There are many other great PC builders out there, with ibuypower and pugetsound just being two of them, in case you don't have time to build your own. This legal nastygram and the confused apology that followed illustrate that this company is in a state of confusion and has lost its way.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)