June 15, 2007 1:45 PM PDT

NBC to feds: Urge ISPs to police piracy

by Anne Broache

Friday marked the deadline for filing comments with federal regulators scrutinizing "broadband industry practices," and for the most part, they're familiar pleas for why or why not to impose strict Net neutrality requirements.

Not so for media conglomerate NBC Universal. Its general counsel, Richard Cotton, urged the Federal Communications Commission not to get bogged down in the question of whether it's wise to prohibit network operators from prioritizing content through making special deals. What's missing from the debate, he wrote, is acknowledgment of "a huge and rapidly growing proportion of Internet traffic consists of stolen property."

It's high time for the FCC to establish in written principles that "broadband service providers have an obligation to use readily available means to prevent the use of their broadband capacity to transfer pirated content," Cotton wrote in its 10-page filing (PDF) posted to the FCC's comment docket Friday.

"Whether those means consist of relatively low-tech but potentially effective steps such as forwarding notices to customers who have been identified as infringers, or using increasingly sophisticated bandwidth management tools as and when they come online, the obligation to deploy such measures must be explicit," Cotton went on.

A controversial law called the Digital Millennium Copyright Act already governs what Web hosts should do about unauthorized content posted on their servers. It generally lets them off the hook for legal liability, provided that they don't turn a blind eye to copyright infringement and that they remove infringing material when notified.

NBC argues in its filing that some providers have, in fact, done just that--refused to forward notices to subscribers caught copying content illicitly and ignoring patterns of such violations. The company singles out peer-to-peer file sharing networks as problematic, arguing their high-bandwidth operations are not conducive to copyright infringement but also degrade the Internet service of "law-abiding consumers."

"Consumers are entitled to competition among content providers," Cotton wrote, "but not the unfair competition that results when one provider steals the desirable content that another has spent millions of dollars to develop and distribute through legitimate channels."

Of the rest of the nearly 10,000 documents posted to the commission's online docket at press time, the vast majority appears to come from private citizens, often clearly inspired by handy form letters drafted by grassroots advocacy groups. The usual suspects representing telecommunications, cable and Internet companies also appear.

Several hundred commenters focused less squarely on Net neutrality and more on gripes about broadband companies that lock "consumers into long-term contracts with high termination fees."

advertisement
Click here!
Recent posts from News Blog
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Was InfoWorld's CTO of the Year award a year late?
VMWare VI4 renamed to vSphere
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
The model is wrong.
by ethana2 June 15, 2007 2:58 PM PDT
Selling content by the copy doesn't work. It is artificial scarcity, and trying to make it work slows down progress, and takes away our freedoms. Put an extra tax on broadband to renumerate the industry, abolish DRM, and piracy will disappear. Which is harder to track down, teenagers or tax evaders? The fact of the matter is that in this day and age, there is no legitimate reason for intellectual goods to be so restricted.

Everyone pays money, everyone has access to everything intangible. Culture becomes rich and beautiful. It can work. What the MaFIAA don't seem to realize is that their business model can't.
Reply to this comment
Piracy
by georgiarat June 15, 2007 3:22 PM PDT
I firmly oppose the theft of music, movies, etc by any means.
However, it greatly concerns me when there is pressure by the
content providers on the ISP's to police the actions of its users.
While this might be argued a legitimate reason it is not hard to
imagine how the next demand might not be quite and clear nor
the next nor the one after that.
Reply to this comment
I really don't know how they can do this...
by gsmiller88 June 15, 2007 4:20 PM PDT
I mean, this would be like the government going through every
single letter in the mail to check for scams. These companies just
need to shut the hell up already.
Reply to this comment
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Can RIM get its mojo back?

The new BlackBerry Tour, carried by Verizon and Sprint, arrives Sunday, even as RIM seems to be losing sales to exclusive devices like the iPhone and Pre.

With Chrome, Google reignites the OS wars

roundup Google Chrome OS, due in 2010, underscores the Web giant's cloud-computing ambitions and opens new competition with Microsoft.
• What Chrome OS has on Windows that Linux doesn't

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right