• On CHOW: Girls who hate girly drinks
May 23, 2007 10:35 AM PDT

The hydrogen-powered Mercedes

by Harry Fuller
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

One often-cited alternative to gasoline-powered cars is hydrogen. Editors Michael Kanellos and Brian Cooley took a look at one example of a hydrogen-powered test car, a small Mercedes. To keep Kanellos from endangering himself and said vehicle, they set the top speed on this hydro-chariot at only 85 miles per hour. Take a look.

Originally posted at Crave
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
Its About time!......its time to roll with this on
by acerides May 26, 2007 8:42 AM PDT
We have been waiting and in need of this for way to long. I wonder how much help the Bush Admin. is helping with this? America should have NASA developing this before we explore space any further. This is truly great! Kudos!!

http://hitmanpro1.com
Reply to this comment
H2 fuel cell cars will never be practical
by albizzia May 27, 2007 1:37 PM PDT
The PEM fuel cells used in these cars are extremely expensive, due to the need for costly catalysts and membranes. Cost of PEM fuel cells is far higher than LiIon battery packs, or even solar cells. PEM fuel cells are also short lived, requiring replacement in less than 85K miles.

H2 is an extremely bulky fuel, all methods of automotive storage (compression, liquification, metal hydrides, etc.) consume a lot of energy, are expensive, heavy, and still take up a lot of room to get even a modest driving range.

There are several methods of making H2, all of them expensive and inefficient. Currently, the cheapest is by reacting fossil fuels with steam at high temperatures to get CO2 and H2. H2 fuel costs more per mile, and "electric fuel" costs much less per mile, when compared to gasoline.

Water electrolysis is only 60% efficient, PEM fuel cells 50%, subtract energy needed to store the H2 and overall efficiency is less than 24%. Compare that with 85% efficiency for charger and battery, and it's obvious - battery electric cars are far more efficient, and "electric fuel" will always cost much less than H2.

H2 fuel cell cars have been promised "real soon" for over 30 years, but the've already been rendered obsolete. The future is electric.
Reply to this comment
advertisement
Click Here

Google's social side aims for some Buzz

Facebook and Twitter are the darlings of the social-media world, not Google--which hopes to change that with Buzz, betting it can organize your online social life.

Watching the birth of a gaming start-up

Stewart Butterfield and his friends are back at it with a new company. CNET's Daniel Terdiman was given exclusive, behind-the-scenes access as they built it from scratch.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right