May 4, 2007 10:08 AM PDT

Florida ditches problematic touch-screen voting, and now what?

by Declan McCullagh
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

MONTREAL -- Florida's decision this week to dump touch-screen voting machines is a good start, computer scientists said at the Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference here on Friday.

The controversial ATM-like machines, which have been plagued by reports of bugs and vulnerabilities, will be replaced with optical-scan balloting, accorfding to a Florida legislature vote this week.

A panel of respected computer scientists -- including Peter Neumann of SRI International, Barbara Simons of the Association of Computing Machinery, and Ron Rivest of MIT (the "R" in the RSA algorithm) -- painted a dismal picture of the current state of the art of electronic voting.

"The entire process is rife with vulnerabilities," Neumann said in an interview after the panel. "It's weakness in depth. Everything in the entire process is a potential source of vulnerability. The technology we live with is riddled with security flaws. It's riddled with people who don't know what they're doing. It's riddled with problems caused by poor human interfaces. There's no easy answer. People are always looking for easy answers. They want simple systems."

The biggest objection among computer scientists is that many e-voting machines don't have audit trails, so voting totals can be quietly manipulated either through a software bug or by a malicious attacker. Paper trails would be a big step toward fixing that.

That leads to the unusual case of some of the world's most esteemed technologists insisting on an analog backup mechanism. "We were called Luddites," said Simons. "Which I thought was funny coming from people who don't understand technology."

A good summary of the topic, including recommendations for next steps, is in Johns Hopkins professor Avi Rubin's testimony before Congress earlier this year.

Declan McCullagh, CNET News' chief political correspondent, chronicles the intersection of politics and technology. He has covered politics, technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We oughta have a new federal law against this." E-mail Declan.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
My experience...
by billmosby May 4, 2007 10:52 AM PDT
In my part of Utah, anyway, we do use touch-screen voting
machines, but they appear to generate a paper record as well. I
didn't find them particularly confusing, and the interface worked
well. In Florida, it seems, the only thing left to try would be some
sort of mind-reading technology!
Reply to this comment
You know nothing about Florida's situation
by ewsachse May 4, 2007 11:13 AM PDT
There is not a paper trail in the current touch screen voting machines in Florida. Only a select few counties use the "scantron" style voting machines. At least those have a paper trail.

The major problem in Florida is human corruption, i.e. Katherine Harris. Thankfully she is out of politics for now.

We may be idiots in Florida when it comes to voting, but at least we do not have multiple wives like Utah. One or none is quite enough.
View reply
From a Floridian
by deswheeler May 4, 2007 11:18 AM PDT
The interface on the ones that I used in the last election were NOT confusing. I agree that they need a paper back up, but that's all they required. In my opinion, the people who couldn't use these machines need to take a special course to do this. They probably also need reminders to breathe.
by terrence789 July 19, 2009 9:37 PM PDT
Nice website as well as nice article.
Terrence
<a href="http://www.fastrealestate.net">real estate</a>
Reply to this comment
by harie123 July 30, 2009 9:34 PM PDT
The above thought is smart and doesn?t require any further addition. It?s perfect thought from my side.

harie

<a href="http://www.fastrealestate.net">Real Estate</a>
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right