• On BNET: Top 10 signs that your boss sucks
advertisement
May 1, 2007 3:38 PM PDT

Silverlight on Linux? We're in, says Mono founder

by Martin LaMonica

The Mono open-source project will create a Linux version of Silverlight by the end of year, said Miguel de Icaza, a Novell vice president and head of Mono.

At the Mix '07 conference on Monday, Microsoft touted the ability to write Silverlight Web applications that run on Internet Explorer, Firefox and the Safari browser on Mac OS. Next up for Silverlight is an edition for mobile devices, including Windows Mobile.

Asked about plans for Linux, Microsoft executives have been non-committal, saying that it will depend on demand.

But de Icaza, who is attending Mix, was able to commit without hesitating.

The port will allow someone to use .Net languages to create Web applications that run on any Linux device or other platforms that Mono supports. Mono is an open-source implementation of portions of Microsoft's .Net Framework for building cross-platform applications.

Mono developers stand to benefit from the Dynamic Language Runtime, which Microsoft announced on Monday. The code for the Dynamic Language Runtime, which allows dynamic language programmers to create .Net applications, will be released under a license that allows commercial companies to redistribute and modify the code.

Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from News Blog
India prods wireless providers on BlackBerry ban
If you care about Web, ignore this IPO
Nasdaq 5,000: Ten years after the dot-com peak
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
I just love...
by rbanffy May 2, 2007 6:53 AM PDT
...when Microsoft controls the requirements of an open source project... They can make the developers run in circles and enter dead-ends as they please.

As an added benefit, this will help Microsoft in its attempts to create another de-facto standard in the market.

And not to end on this, it should also fuel Ballmer's FUD about Microsoft patents that many free/open-source projects allegedly infringe.

Way to go...
Reply to this comment
Free for everyone
by mr. cynical May 2, 2007 9:21 AM PDT
That's right. All software should be free and all software companies should be non-profit. Any company that tries to make money should be banished from the planet.

/sarcasm off
View reply
If they do...
by jatos May 3, 2007 12:15 PM PDT
It would be a very good move if it worked on Linux, for obvious reasons.
Reply to this comment
What _I_ like is the idea of
by ethana2 August 9, 2007 11:27 PM PDT
Adobe's proprietary flash "standard" getting mowed over like a... I'll spare you the vivid images.

But I'm glad to see another proprietary standard die. It's high time it did. We know it's given our poor devs over at gnash enough trouble.
Reply to this comment
Umm...hate to burst your bunnle
by KRowe_ January 30, 2008 11:06 PM PST
Flash getting replaced by Silverlight is just one proprietary software replacing another. BTW, I wouldn't put flash out of the game yet either. Nearly every commercial website on the planet uses some kind of flash banner it will be a long time before A) Silverlight is actually BETTER than flash B) Flash devs learn Silverlight C) Flash is actually replaced by Silverlight on most sites (which may never happen; still way too early to tell).

Personally, as a professional web developer, I wouldn't even consider using something like Silverlight for any serious work until it gets somewhere near the market penetration as flash currently has. Don't forget, even today, there are still plenty of Win 9x machines out there which will not run Silverlight. Linux, BSS, Solaris, Unix all run flash already as well (not to mention PDAs, Cellphones, etc..) so until Silverlight is actually something that that ~8% of the market which doesn't use Windows or Mac. Microsoft likes to claim that Silverlight is cross-platform compatible but the truth is it is only compatible with Win XP, Vista and Mac running on a standard x86 or PPC (with plenty of power).

Heres a full list of what it works on:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Silverlight#Compatibility" target="_newWindow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Silverlight#Compatibility</a>

Even if everything goes as MS plans; I wouldn't expect to see it in common use for at least 3-5 more years.

But the WPF big brother to silver light is a whole different ball of wax. Since it is meant to be integrated into applications. For applications it isn't nearly as important that they be x-platform compatible. In fact, I can see WPF being the Windows equivalent to Karbon for KDE (which just happens to be one of the coolest things to come to a desktop GUI since the taskbar, IMHO). If Microsoft keeps it up they might just have a desktop as cool as KDE is now in 4-5 years. :)
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement
CNET River
advertisement

Google Instant: Better but not revolutionary

The search leader has genuinely advanced Internet search if not rewritten the rules. But what of searches from the browser?

Apple 2010 iPod lineup, reviewed

CNET reviews Apple's 2010 lineup of iPod portable media players, including the fourth-generation iPod Touch, sixth-generation iPod Nano, and the fourth-generation iPod Shuffle.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right