March 1, 2007 6:37 PM PST

Good news, bad news for security management

by Jon Oltsik
  • Font size
  • Print
  • Post a comment

First, the good news. Security management deals are expanding.

What used to be a small, tactical security event management implementation is evolving into a much bigger opportunity. As enterprise organizations collect log and network flow data, they want to provide it to the network operations, compliance management, system administrators, lines of businesses and security for all kinds of analysis. In geeky technical terms, what was a security-focused data mart is turning into an enterprise IT data warehouse for all kinds of data analysis, event monitoring and reporting.

Now, the bad news. This transition changes the rules of the game.

All of a sudden, tactical products need to be able to scale for enterprise needs. This means a lot more event traffic, processing, data collection, storage, etc. This also requires a distributed data architecture that provides the ability to view and query distributed data from centralized locations. Trust me, this ain't easy--guys like Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and Sybase have spent years working through this problem.

To service all of these enterprise needs, tactical security products must be re-architected to scale or cease to exist.

When tactical point tools evolve into enterprise solutions, the big guys get interested quickly. Why did EMC buy Network Intelligence, IBM grab the GuardedNet assets in the Micromuse acquisition, and Novell open its wallet for e-Security? You guessed it: security management has become an enterprise opportunity and enterprise deals can generate millions of dollars in product and services revenue.

Who wins? Acquired start-ups and their investors certainly do. As this market continues to evolve, so do the big guys who build and sell professional services and honking security and log management products. Users also win as big vendors like EMC, IBM and Symantec throw resources at this market.

Who loses? It's too early to say. Obviously the start-ups that don't get bought are in a tough position, but there is still a lot of buying to be done. We'll absolutely be able to identify the losers 12 months from now.

Jon Oltsik is a senior analyst at the Enterprise Strategy Group. He is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right