February 26, 2007 11:57 AM PST

Report raps Congress's Web sites

by Anne Broache
  • Font size
  • Print
  • Post a comment

In the past, Web sites kept by congressional offices haven't enjoyed the most gleaming track record for fulfilling visitor privacy expectations or even staying online.

Now a new report has attempted to quantify and catalogue who is and isn't getting it right.

In its "2006 Gold Mouse Report: Recognizing the Best Sites on Capitol Hill" (PDF) released Monday, the Congressional Management Foundation, a 30-year-old non-profit organization that bills itself as "dedicated to promoting a more effective Congress," reaches one major conclusion: The quality of congressional Web sites, in general, is "disappointing."

The group found that among sites for individual members in the U.S. House of Representatives, Democrats and Republicans were virtually tied in their performance, but Republicans bested Democrats on committee Web sites. In the Senate, however, Republican politicians' sites fared considerably better than Democrats' sites, scoring 10.3 percent more "A" grades and 14.9 percent more B's.

Here's a sampling of their other findings:

-38.6 percent of congressional office sites received D's or F's, which means they were considered "substandard or failing." "A" grades went to 13.8 percent of all the congressional sites.
-About half of the House Web sites and 73 percent of the Senate Web sites post privacy statements. Less than half of House Web sites and 62 percent of Senate Web sites post a privacy statement on every page.
-Blogs haven't caught in full force, for better or for worse. Only 5.3 percent of House sites and 9 percent of Senate sites contain them.
-Only 37 percent of House sites and 46 percent of Senate sites provide information about the member's voting record.

The rankings were based on 135 criteria, including the Web site's user-friendliness, overall look and feel, and quality and timeliness of information for constituents. Professors at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, the University of California-Riverside, and Ohio State University, assisted with the analysis.

The CMF conducted a similar project in 2002 and 2003. Only three politicians--Rep. Mike Honda (D-Calif.) and Sens. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)--have earned A's in all three assessments.

Much of this year's 100-page document is also devoted to a series of seemingly common-sense do's and don'ts for congressional Web managers. Among the advice: "Don't fail to keep your information fresh and updated" and do "Foster trust in your Web site by protecting citizens' privacy."

Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right