• On GameSpot: $299 PS3 Slim and price cut announced!
December 5, 2005 5:21 PM PST

Why Wikipedia will survive the storm

by Mike Yamamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • Post a comment

Here we go again: The recent controversies over Wikipedia, which began with a disputed entry involving a former aide to Robert F. Kennedy, are being criticized by mainstream media organizations that just don't get it.

Wikipedia

The online encyclopedia's errors, they say, show that the communal, open-source approach to information doesn't work because control is lost in the wilds of the Internet. What they seem incapable of understanding is that errors and misinformation are not exclusive to any medium, online or off, communal or closed. News.com's Charles Cooper noted poignantly in a column last week, for example, that an encyclopedia entry he read as a child was "nonsensical, if not borderline racist."

Will Wikipedia eventually sued on charges of defamation? Almost certainly--just as newspapers, television networks and other large information distributors have been taken to court for generations. Will the case prove that Wikipedia can never be trusted? Hardly.

The New York Times, the Washington Post, CBS News and many others have weathered far more egregious circumstances than those that have befallen Wikipedia. The general public has simply learned to be wary of all information from any form of media. And the those outlets that have the strongest credibility will, in the end, have the most followers.

Blog community response:

"Problem that CNN doesn't see is that if the wrong article was published in the normal, big 20+ volume 'Bolshaja Sovetskaja Enciklopedia' (The Big Soviet Encyclopedia), he would never get a change in the article. Perhaps he may have got a 'correction' piece of paper, stuck in a volume of the printed edition, which will be published six years after the original. What Wikipedia gives to the readers, is that its articles can always be changed."
--Blogs of Internet Society--Bulgaria

"Democracy is a bitch. And Wikipedia has been the center of some controversies lately. For every person that volunteers to help police the articles there's another person who will happily deface them. Such is the way of the people and unfortunately, it's the price we pay for a history of the people, by the people."
--Dasspunk

"Just because Wikipedia is online does not mean common sense is useless. Use common sense, just like anything else."
--Vox in Sox

Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
advertisement

E-readers' next chapter--no happy ending?

There were plenty of e-book readers on display at CES 2010, but many question whether the market for such dedicated devices can support all the new entrants.
• Photos: E-readers at CES 2010

Inside the world's long-lost first microcomputer

Vintage computer historians have long revered the Altair 8800. As it turns out, an unknown computer project at Sacramento State beat the Altair by three years.
• Images: The first microcomputers

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right