Sony Ericsson details its first Android phone
Sony Ericsson has released details and a video of its upcoming Xperia X10 smartphone based on Google's Android operating system.
The X10, which had been code-named Rachel, has a 1GHz Snapdragon processor, which should make this one of the fastest Android phones yet. The phone will sport version 1.6 of Android--aka Donut--and it will run applications from the Android Market and Sony Ericsson's PlayNow arena. The device will also feature an 8-megapixel camera, with autofocus and an LED photo light.
Expect to see the Xperia X10 in stores in the first quarter of 2010. Meanwhile, here's a video that Sony Ericsson posted Monday.
Read more of "Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 hands-on photos: Hello, Rachel" at Crave UK.






[CNET editors' note: URL removed.]
They need Verizon.
They need multitasking.
They need a competent app launcher.
They need access to Google's Navigation and other innovations.
But my guess is that they will screw up as bad in the phone category as they did on the desktop. Single-digit marketshare is easy to imagine for the iPhone now that it as lots of competition from others, all using the same (better, cheaper) OS.
Yes, way to go GOOGLE. Sony... another "pretty device" good job. How much is this going to cost my wallet? *cringe* Don't ask!
So you would agree that the classic apple hammer thrower commercial was awful because it did nothing to show you what they were selling?
It is pre-production by several months , but Droid is here now and has advantages , such as stock Android without layer on top to slow it down. The people there said battery life was abysmal too due to Snapdragon CPU.
The Droid has been said to have very good battery life in tests due to OMAP CPU/Android 2.0
7.7 hrs talk time in tests ! Beauty is often more than skin deep and in eye of beholder. This looks more like a girlie-phone to me.
--> http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_x10-2964.php minus OSX... different platform, different requirements..
I wouldn't be surprised if it costs $400 with 2-yr contract, and that will kill the product.
And I still think the biggest problem is the size. The video used female model. I just don't see how a teenager/20's girl carrying a big phone like that.
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_x10-2964.php
Question: What do you like about Google Voice?
Answer: I like the fact that you can send and receive free sms through the web. Sms is not an inherently costly feature, carriers just make it so because it is a cash cow. I also appreciate the way Google voice seamlessly integrates with my mytouch 3g android phone.
Question: What do you NOT like about Google Voice?
Answer: Voicemail transcription could be more accurate but it is free so you get what you pay for... Help faqs concerning billing charges could be more robust/ detailed. Something not concerning Google voice but that I have a beef with is the iphone/ ipod touch having certain Google features before Android phones do. Which are sometimes more robust to boot!! That is a travesty. I understand Google wanting to be on every platform but certain apps should be reserved to boost Android and Chrome OS and differentiate them from other platforms. Thats my own 2 cents. Also Android is supposed to be an open platform. Stop letting carriers decide when to push updates and what features to let people have on their Android phones. Android should be open to users as well, not just to Tmobile, Sprint, Verizon, At&t, and phone manufacturers.
Last thing that needs to be fixed is offline creating and editing of Google Docs and Google Calendar. It is possible to create a message with offline Gmail and it will sync and send the message when you next have an Internet connection. That is why it has replaced my Microsoft Outlook. The rest of the Google Apps Suite should allow that same type of functionality. Obviously no one is always in range of a data connection whether it be 3g, wifi, or the soon to be widely available Wimax and LTE. Not having offline creation and editing is a HUGE deal breaker for many people. Use some of your innovations in your push for HTML5 technology to add this capability and then you will really have a Microsoft Office killer.
Question: What would you like to see added?
Answer: Voip HAS to be added to Google voice. Just merge Google voice and Google talk into one product and enable calls to be placed through 3g data or solely through wifi. If carriers won't go for the 3g data option then atleast there was effort on your part to try. Right now with the FCC cracking down on service providers I think with a big enough push the 3g option would be possible. There is no reason to use a third party provider like Skype, or Gizmo5 through sip protocol. With a very cheap or free voip service Google could crush Skype which is currently involved in a legal battle for its future. Google could also dominate the future of telephony. Voip IS the future of telephony.
I love google products. Chrome browser, docs, calendar, reader, offline gmail, google maps and soon to be google maps navigation. I use them all and they are all very polished best in class applications. Roll all of them into Chrome OS with my Google Voip idea, then make it sync and talk seamlessly with Android phones and you have a Microsoft Windows desktop OS and Apple ipod/iphone killer.
Written from Ideapad y650 with Windows 7. Also have an ipod touch, mytouch 3g, and Toshiba NB-205. Android is the future if Google wants it to be.
- by HatecrewDr November 3, 2009 10:47 AM PST
- Wow, sweet phone. What a god awful advertisement.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (81 Comments)