• On GameFAQs: What causes the Red Ring of Death?
July 8, 2009 4:27 PM PDT

T-Mobile launches iPhone challenger

by Marguerite Reardon

NEW YORK--T-Mobile USA is betting big on its second Android smartphone, the MyTouch 3G, as it officially launches the device making it its flagship smartphone to compete against Apple's iPhone on AT&T.

(Credit: T-Mobile USA)

The company announced the MyTouch 3G, which is essentially the same phone as the Google Ion or the HTC Magic, last month. And on Wednesday T-Mobile made the device available for pre-orders to its existing customers. The device will be generally available starting August 5.

The MyTouch is the second smartphone the carrier has introduced that uses Google's open-source mobile operating system, Android. T-Mobile introduced the world's first Google Android phone, called the G1, last fall. And so far the company claims it has sold more than 1 million devices.

Thinner and slightly smaller than the G1, the MyTouch features a large 3.2-inch touch screen with 3G and Wi-Fi support. The device comes loaded with several applications including integrated Google Apps, but it also can access the Android Market, a virtual application storefront where users can have their pick of some 5,000 applications for downloading.

Executives at an event here Wednesday made no bones about pitting the MyTouch against Apple's popular iPhone, which is sold exclusively for AT&T's network in the U.S.

"My hope and expectation is that this device will be compared to the iPhone," said Denny Post, senior vice president and chief marketing officer at T-Mobile USA.

It's easy to see the similarities between the phones. Like the iPhone, the MyTouch has a touch screen with a virtual keyboard. And it has access to a lot of very cool applications.

But executives also point out what they consider important differences between the MyTouch and the iPhone.

Personalization is the big buzzword the T-Mobile marketing folks have used in launching the new phone. They claim no two MyTouches will be the same since users can customize their devices to tailor their own lifestyles and needs. The customization goes beyond the ability to download different applications, and also includes the ability to change the background on the phone's home screen and the ability to organize application icons on the home screen.

While iPhone users can drag and drop icons and customize their sleep mode screens, the home screen essentially looks the same on all iPhones.

Whether or not this differentiator is a big deal to consumers is yet to be seen. Another possibly more important differentiator is the fact that the Android software on the MyTouch allows users to easily switch between multiple applications that are open on the device. The software also allows information from one application to be fed or viewed in another application. For example, there is a little user bar at the top of the phone's screen that shows the temperature and weather. It also has alerts for new e-mails and text messages as they come into the phone, without interrupting the application that is going.

Of course, the MyTouch is not the only smartphone that offers this kind of application multitasking. The Palm Pre announced earlier this summer for Sprint Nextel's network has gotten high marks for its ability to multitask. But Andrew Sherrard, vice president at T-Mobile, says that what sets the MyTouch apart from the Pre is the Android Market mobile application store, which already has 5,000 applications.

At the heart of the MyTouch is the open platform Android software, which was developed by Google. And because it uses the same operating system developed for the G1, the features and functionality available on the MyTouch are not much different from the G1.

And it's likely that other Android devices that will be launched on T-Mobile's network and other operators' networks later this year will also be similar in terms of functionality because they use the same operating system.

But instead of lumping multiple Android devices together, T-Mobile will be focusing much of its marketing on the MyTouch as its flagship device. This makes sense from a competitive standpoint as other wireless operators highlight their own exclusive handsets. Apple has the iPhone. And Sprint has the new Palm Pre. Now T-Mobile will focus its marketing on the MyTouch.

The G1, the first Android phone to come to market, launched in November last year and has been a major success for the carrier. But the phone has mostly appealed to early adopters, Post said. The MyTouch will be targeted at the mass market.

"It will appeal to the same consumers that are interested in the iPhone," she said. "But the applications used on this phone won't be just for show. They won't simply be a novelty. Instead they will be very useful and purposeful."

As part of its push to make the MyTouch its premiere smartphone, T-Mobile has put extra effort into training retail staff to help new customers customize their phones and add new applications.

And even though the Android Market today is only a tenth the size of Apple's App Store, it's expected to grow rapidly as more Android devices come to market. And when that happens, Post says there will be a great need to help consumers to sift through the chaos and discover new applications.

"It will become increasingly important for us to recommend and help highlight applications we think consumers will find most useful," she said. "Customers need a guide to help them find useful apps, and move beyond simple novelties. So you will see us creating bundles for recommendations to make discovery easier."

But going up against the iPhone will not be an easy task as the latest version of the device, the iPhone 3GS, seems even hotter than previous generations. In its first weekend, Apple and AT&T sold more than 1 million units. But consumers are hungry for alternatives, and Post believes consumers will also be swayed by T-Mobile's value proposition. The carrier's unlimited data package is priced about $5 less per month than a comparable data package from AT&T.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Wireless
Initial Motorola Droid sales look good
Sprint to cut 2,000 to 2,500 jobs
Report: Clearwire gets more cash from investors
Nokia recalls 14 million chargers
New Verizon ad calls iPhone 'misfit toy'
Apple said to be working on 'world mode' iPhone
Is Verizon's new early-termination fee anti-consumer?
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (81 Comments)
by FrameRunner July 8, 2009 5:04 PM PDT
The problem is, you can't just compete directly with the Iphone. The goal should be to innovate to a new level..There is no such thing as a Iphone killer, but when a better device comes out that is able to redefine smart phones it will naturally take the fan bae.
Reply to this comment
by Norseman July 8, 2009 5:15 PM PDT
I'd be very interested to hear some of your ideas about what this "redefined" smartphone would be like.
Care to share them?
by TyDiz July 8, 2009 10:14 PM PDT
There is a difference between competing against the iPhone and saying its an iPhone killer...I don't think Android is an iPhone killer...The operating systems are too different and really can't be compared in that way. But they are definitely the same market, being smartphones that aren't really set for corporate use...more like smartphones for the average user. Its a great option for T-Mobile users compared to switching to AT&T.
by Random_Walk July 9, 2009 4:42 AM PDT
Makes perfect sense, actually.

The iPhone broke out and took off not because it was trying to aim at the Blackberry, or at the Treo, or at (insert smartphone leader here)...

The iPhone became a hit because it offered a combination of features that the big boys didn't have, and put it in a package that consumers wanted.

If you compete directly with something, the best you can hope for is to beat that one competitor, and usually you'll fail as a wannabe or also-ran. Proof? There's been at least five or six touch-screen smartphones that have come out since the iPhone... all of them looking suspiciously like one. Each has been swooned over by the press as an "iPhone killer", yet each has either failed entirely, or came in at a very distant 2nd/3rd/4th/etc. place.
by ballmerisanape July 9, 2009 10:34 AM PDT
Isn't this phone $199 with a 2 year contract? You can get an iPhone 3G for $99. Also.. it's not even multiouch... so, yes.. competitor would be a good word to use. My guess is you will no longer see the term "iPhone Killer" anymore.... since none of those came even close.

Google is starting with a scalable platform... and that is why Android will last.. now.. they just need to find a hardware company that can design well.
by ckh1272 July 10, 2009 2:29 AM PDT
"by daniel172008 July 9, 2009 2:22 AM PDT
As biased as he is, he is right. The iPhone is limited.

"Can only use Apps from the iTunes store? What, is 40,000 not enough for you? "

Sooo then why do the majority of tech savvy iPhone users jailbreak their phone? lol "

What do you mean by "majority" of users. Care to prove this or do you just like to throw empty stats out there?
by johnqh July 30, 2009 7:17 AM PDT
Less than 2% of iPhones are jailbreaked. There are studies done by ad providers.
by bugsy3333 July 8, 2009 5:05 PM PDT
yawn...
Reply to this comment
by Orion Blastar July 8, 2009 5:23 PM PDT
The iPhone is limited and locks in a lot of options like no user serviceable battery, can only use apps from Apple's iPhone apps store, can't use it on a non-AT&T network, etc.

Maybe this MyTouch won't be locked in and have better freedom and rights for its users. One can only hope.

The whole reason why I won't use an iPhone is the price, lack of freedom and rights, limited in what I can install on it, and when the battery goes bad I have to buy a new one I cannot swap out the bad battery. Plus the iPhone gets really hot and can burn people when left on for a long time.
Reply to this comment
by Zippy-T-Pinhead July 8, 2009 5:37 PM PDT
I love how people complain as to how "limited" the iPhone is.

Can only use Apps from the iTunes store? What, is 40,000 not enough for you?

No user serviceable battery? I've had all 3 iPhones and never have had any need to do anything with my battery but charge it once in awhile - plus as I have with all cell phones, since I owned my first one in the early 90s, I always carry a spare battery, or in this case, a battery pack.

Can't use it on a non-AT&T network? So? My AT&T works just fine, thanks.

It can burn people?! Who are you, friggin Elisabeth Hasselback? You believe every sensationalist piece of crap you read on the Internet.

Dude, you've never owned the phone and are basing your opinion entirely on what you read. Have an original thought for once in your life.
by monkeyfun14 July 8, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
@Zippy-T-Pinhead


A good portion of these apps do the same damn thing and a good portion are useless.
by ckh1272 July 8, 2009 7:55 PM PDT
"by monkeyfun14 July 8, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
@Zippy-T-Pinhead
A good portion of these apps do the same damn thing and a good portion are useless."

And of course you know this because you use an iPhone right?? Didn't think so.
by Perry_Clease July 8, 2009 8:23 PM PDT
"A good portion of these trolls say the same damn thing and a good portion are useless."

And good portion of the iPhones apps are damn useful.
by TyDiz July 8, 2009 10:29 PM PDT
I agree...there is a lot of pointless apps on both androids market and iPhone's app store. A lot of developers have a hard time innovating when 40,000 other apps exist already...you can only do so much before you really can say everything is done.

Being locked down is a big deal to a lot of people and you really can't get offended by someones opinion about that, especially since obviously its not a huge deal to you or other iPhone users, seeing that a good chuck of people have an iPhone.
by professionaladventurer July 9, 2009 1:28 AM PDT
So you don't use an iphone because you can't afford one? I get that, but let me dispells some of the other thing you said.

I m on my second iPhone (yea got one of the first ones and got a 3G one about 3 months ago) mine never got very hot and I never wore out the battery. And my wife has one to with no really issues other then right at the beginning . ATT works pretty good every where I have been. From the north slope of Alaska, to most of the Hawaiian Islands, and all the west coast states by car on and off the interstate. Sure sometimes the EDGE was slow, but 3G is pretty wide ranging now. I have even serviced my phone (well it was my wife's) and even living 3000 miles from an Apple store the turn around time was 24 hours from phone call to Apple to working phone back in her hands. Sure, it's not for every one, but Apple is a good company that makes a good product. For Proof I am no nerd fan boy, this is who I am: www.anadventurer.com
by daniel172008 July 9, 2009 2:22 AM PDT
As biased as he is, he is right. The iPhone is limited.

"Can only use Apps from the iTunes store? What, is 40,000 not enough for you? "

Sooo then why do the majority of tech savvy iPhone users jailbreak their phone? lol

Even though you can "jailbreak" android (the G1 at least, not sure about this new one), you don't really need too. Not only can you rearange icons on the home screen, but you can completely replace the home screen with a 3rd party one. Same with everything else on the android phones...

AT&T obviously has problems, otherwise Apple wouldn't of practically told them to F off and not renew their contract and go to Verizon. If you want an iPhone, wait until Verizon has it. A lot of the limitations that Apple is blamed for is because of AT&T, not all of them are though.
by ApplerPS3 July 9, 2009 2:44 AM PDT
Why do you have to accept the status quo? Do something about it...Jailbreak the iphone, and you will see the phone's true power. jailbreaking is a process that takes minutes, and you end up taking control of this beautiful machine. Customize your theme, wallpaper, use third party applications that are (1) sometimes more useful than the ones on the app store (like the brighter flashlight as a very simple example (2) Mostly free. Not because Apple or ATT says youre not allowed means youre not allowed. You bought the damn thing, do whatever you want with it...and its very safe. I have been using the 1st Generation Iphone for almost a year and a half on the same jailbreak (back when the process took hours to complete) and it never failed. I also did it on the 3G iphone before it fell in the toilet, rendering the phone useless, and now i already bought a 3GS device but waiting for the dev team's jailbreak to be released (there is already one out there, just search for purplera1n). Unlocking is optional, done from the Cydia app on the phone itself- Cydia being the equivalent of the app store). Use your imagination! The iphone's backdoor community is huge. Enjoy.
by Random_Walk July 9, 2009 4:45 AM PDT
"A good portion of these apps do the same damn thing and a good portion are useless."

...ever been to the Blackberry app store? I have... and it has the exact same problems, only in a smaller catalog.
by monkeyfun14 July 9, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
@ckh

You don't need to have an iPhone to know this just browsing through a the app store without one will prove this.
See more comment replies
by Psyner July 8, 2009 5:35 PM PDT
I love my G1 and would take it over the iPhone any day. I really wish they'd make VPN connections avail like iphone has had since launch(I think?) Huge disadvantage for me.
Reply to this comment
by Galen20K July 8, 2009 5:58 PM PDT
I completely Agree. G1 has so many MORE Advantages over the iPhone and its just the Better phone in so many ways.
by lazycat202 July 8, 2009 6:21 PM PDT
Android is going to kill Iphone & WinMo soon or later. For now, i'm staying with WinMo until Android become more popular (apps and OS itself). Iphone isn't in my dictionary.If it's FREE, i'll take it and "jailbreak" it. Then I'll have my freedom back.
by rrod182 July 8, 2009 6:41 PM PDT
@lazycat202

No Android will not kill anyone. The developer base for the iPhone is huge. Android is a PITA to develop for, too many moving parts. Every device is different, different features, different screen, different input, etc. Its like the difference between developing for a PC vs. Mac. Time to market with iPhone is pretty fast, and one submission will work on ALL devices, with ALL features. The only exceptions of course are the new compass and video. But every iPhone has the same screen res, keyboard, audio, etc, etc, etc. Android devices don't. (emphasis on the period)

They would have to over take the fan base which would require a major **** up on Apples part. I doubt that will happen.
by lazycat202 July 8, 2009 7:04 PM PDT
@Rodd:
you're probably right. Each phone has its own features. I woudn't hold to my Iphone (if i own 1) for more than 2 years. Why? I prefer new layout, new design, and new things that current phones don't have. I've used all Iphone new features on my WinMo device long time ago. new compas?? who need it while you're using sound-guidance/turn-by-turn GPS?
Put a faster chip and more storage inside Iphone. Then call yourself King Iphone? gezz!
Once time, i showed my HTC device to a friend of mine (iphone 3G fan) and it knocked him out ;) finally, he purchased a HTC Diamond.
by protagonistic July 8, 2009 8:48 PM PDT
I bet you were one of those who also said the iPod would never succeed because other players had more features and were cheaper. Never discount the popularity of a device that doesn't try to do everything and does try to be easy to use.
by TyDiz July 8, 2009 10:50 PM PDT
@rrod

As a developer, creating apps on Android isn't to big of a deal. In the future, it might get a little more complicated to be friendly to all android devices, but incompatible apps will be filtered out based on your device in the future...plus handling input isn't hard using the SDK.

I've never coded for iPhone but using Java over C++ is a huge win for a lot of hobby developers out there because it doesn't take so much precision(I love coding in C++ but memory management is just no fun in most cases). There is room for both to exist, ones not going to win against the other any time soon. Both are amazing OS's, and both have an amazing future, mostly because they are going to push innovation on each other continuously, as the mobile market opens up more, which is always good for us consumers :D
by rrod182 July 9, 2009 8:26 AM PDT
@TyDiz

Yes there is definitely room for both, I doubt the Android platform will fail. iPhone dev is done in Obj-C and not C++ by the way. The Obj-C runtime does have GC and can do all the memory management for you.

Rob
by TyDiz July 9, 2009 9:26 AM PDT
Oh ok, that's pretty cool actually. Its still a proprietary coding language though which has at least kept me away at least. Looking at Obj-C it looks like it uses a lot of the same theorys...at least with object messaging(which is one of the most important things to know when coding for android at least. I wonder if this was done to make it easier to translate a iPhone app into an android app...or even to make the transitions easier between coding languages.

Anyway, $99 is a lot of money to get the licensing to publish with Apple...I like the fact that I started out making free apps on Android but $25 isn't that hard to let fly away free, it helps build a reputable name for myself, which will hopefully help out when I do release a paid app on the market.

As a user of Android, I like having competing markets because developers tend to innovate off each other...If something amazing comes out on one market, another dev will try and recreate that for another market(or in the case of all the Flashlight apps ehhh....I think that speaks for itself)
by johnqh July 30, 2009 7:27 AM PDT
To the customers, they may be able to filter by the phone model, but how will developers test the compatibility?

Windows Mobile all over again.
by edtechlab July 8, 2009 6:11 PM PDT
I am holding off on getting a smartphone because the total cost of service involved. When they come down, hopefully, then I will get the one that has the best value.
Reply to this comment
by TyDiz July 8, 2009 10:54 PM PDT
Its not bad...T-Mobile charges $15 for unlimited messaging regularly(which is similar to most carriers), and for the android phones(G1 & myTouch) its $35 for unlimited messaging + unlimited data...$20 is an amazing deal for unlimited interent, and you really don't realize how true that is until you are internet enabled always, even more so when you have a real HTML browser on your phone.
by myles taylor July 8, 2009 6:17 PM PDT
The reason the iPhone will remain the "king" as it were, is because there is only one iPhone, and the market will soon be diluted with Android devices. People who want an iPhone have a choice between.....well more storage space and only more recently the 3G and the 3GS. People who want an Android device have many phones to pick from or will shortly. That's not a bad thing, but it will keep any other one phone from stealing the crown. There are lots of phones out there that are as good or better than the iPhone, but the iPhone has a few things (including an integration with the iPod Touch) that makes it a winner.
Reply to this comment
by lazycat202 July 8, 2009 6:29 PM PDT
many people just don't know there're better (than iphone) phones out there.
To compare with Iphone, name few things that my HTC Touch Pro2 can't do (itune???) gateway of hell!
by cary1 July 9, 2009 6:39 AM PDT
@lazycat202

HTC touch pro? Is that the phone that runs on Windows Mobile? That's like comparing EEE PC to MacBook Pro. EEE PC can do every thing that MBP can do. It's not just what it can do. It's how easy/intuitive it is to do something.

I agree iTunes is gateway to Hell. I hate it myself. I use it only when I have to add music to my iPhone.

BTW, before people pick up their pitchforks, I am not an Apple fan. The only Apple product worth purchasing is the iPhone.
by Stopper90004 July 8, 2009 6:23 PM PDT
Apple is the "evil empire" to MP3 players and smart phones as Microsoft is to the PC market: Steve Jobs wants to dominate all aspects of this universe and charge ridiculous prices (e.g. for MP3s) when you can get it virtually free on other services (Napster and Rhapsody... $15 a month for over 4 million songs). The iPhone is a stunner, but like the lemmings who flocked to the iPod, buyers will be trapped in the typically overpriced world of Apple and AT&T when they blindly fall on their swords for this techno equivalent to a Mermaid. With the Google platform, you get an even better interface and multi-tasking apps environment PLUS you get to pick the hardware ... within 18 months Google aps will easily overtake the Apple stores line up of useless aps. Eat my corn-Holey apple suckas.
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 July 8, 2009 6:48 PM PDT
If everything else is better and cheaper at the same time, then why do you care? You have choices in phones, phone companies, and sources for music, so make those choices.

But it seems millions upon millions of people like the iPhone, and don't mind the cost of iTunes. So why not let them pay?

As for all those great $15 services: they only work because most people don't use them. If everyone was using the $15 plan, and nobody was paying for music from iTunes or Amazon, then either the $15 services would have to increase in cost, or there would be no content out there because there would be no money to be made in the industry.
by JJohnson1701 July 8, 2009 6:28 PM PDT
I would be more inclined to buy this phone if it had what nearly EVERY OTHER PHONE HAS - A HEADPHONE JACK.

If you're positioning yourself against iPhones, you need to be able to show your media chops, which will mean you need to play audio and video files as good as, or better than, iPhone. That starts with including a standard 3.5mm headphone jack.
Reply to this comment
by nutzareus July 8, 2009 6:36 PM PDT
Never heard of Bluetooth headset? Get a life!
by ikramerica--2008 July 8, 2009 6:49 PM PDT
Yeah, $100 headsets that you have have to charge and have inferior sound quality are much preferred by all people to the option to plug in higher quality headphones, or noise canceling headphones, etc.
by TyDiz July 8, 2009 10:57 PM PDT
The dongle works just fine...I bought a couple for my g1 and it honestly isn't to big of a deal to hook it on when you need it. Plus it comes with the dongles now(it didn't when I got my phone..grr!), so its not really a reason to complain anymore...just a slight inconvience.
by loose_screw July 9, 2009 9:54 AM PDT
Yeah, dongles look really cool--NOT. If you're competing against a sexy device like the iPhone, dongles are not the way to win consumers over. Period.

Also, Bluetooth headsets are way too friggin huge. Until they become earbud sized, forget it. You'll never win the young crowd that currently pine for the iPhone.
by Seaspray0 July 9, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
As someone who's used both an ear dongle and a bluetooth, I can vouch for the bluetooth being the friendliest.
by TyDiz July 9, 2009 12:00 PM PDT
The dongle I have looks like its part of your head phone cords...you don't even notice it really. I agree though, not having it doesn't do HTC any favors, but not having it isn't as big of a deal as people make it sound. If HTC didn't do it on every single one of their phones, I might have been offended a bit, but its not a big deal to me, honestly.
by Captain Bebops July 8, 2009 6:48 PM PDT
Requiring phone applications to be certified was just the wrong and unimaginative approach for the iPhone and other phone platforms. Android apps don't require certification because their security system works in a way that an app can't tamper with another apps data. Too bad Apple wasn't that imaginative or maybe it was that AT&T wanted to create an "elite" class of developers. That would be typical "suit" thinking.
Reply to this comment
by Jonathan Monahan July 8, 2009 7:18 PM PDT
Yea that $99 developer fee (only needed for submittal and actual iPhone testing otherwise free) is sure keeping a lot of people out I mean over 50,000 apps is just too little!
by dkgshiz100 July 8, 2009 7:27 PM PDT
To bad the G1 was kind of a flop. I cant think of any of my friends that actually own a G1.
by TyDiz July 8, 2009 11:00 PM PDT
Holy crap!! $99?? Ugh, I guess you iPhone guys won't see any crossplatform apps from me anytime soon. I was worried about releasing free apps for the $25 one time charge that I paid for Android.
by dkgshiz100 July 8, 2009 7:05 PM PDT
The app store is what makes the iphone the king of the smartphones.
Reply to this comment
by dkgshiz100 July 8, 2009 7:10 PM PDT
Woa, this thing has a proprietary headset jack?! *** is this crap?! Sweet I have to use some crappy T-mobile proprietary headphone for this iphone killer!
Reply to this comment
by bob1xxxx July 8, 2009 9:23 PM PDT
uh no it come with a usb to 3.5mm adaptor with the phone , just like the ones you could by off ebay for the g1 to 5.00
by dkgshiz100 July 8, 2009 7:10 PM PDT
Woa, this thing has a proprietary headset jack?! *** is this crap?! Sweet I have to use some crappy T-mobile proprietary headphone for this iphone killer!
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher July 8, 2009 7:41 PM PDT
"iPhone killer"---zzzzzzzz,
wake me when the Gen 4 iPhone comes
out--the real next iPhone killer. Zzzzzz.
Reply to this comment
by Otto Holland July 8, 2009 7:43 PM PDT
Nice comments...why don't you guys buy a few pairs of boxing gloves and knock each other teeth out? Well... not really, just joking.

While you are all at it and commenting on the iPhone, Andriod etc; I am laughing my a$$ off. No iPhone or Andriod or Pre for me; I am sticking with my Crackberry Curve; it does what I need, make calls, listen to music and what video's. Best of all, the price; yeah I know it's not shiny but it works well and I don't look like a geek or nerd. Oh! the price, free...I use it for the companies business.
Reply to this comment
by Captain Bebops July 8, 2009 7:44 PM PDT
I think that Android phones will begin overtaking the iPhone at this time next year. By then there will be enough different carriers and at least 18 different phones available. Plus there will be the Android iTouch competitors too. Apple doesn't quickly approve apps like they used to and a lot of developers don't want to learn a dead end language (Object C). I'm sure just like our congress critters Apple won't wake up until their boat is sinking.
Reply to this comment
by johnqh July 30, 2009 7:19 AM PDT
If the number of phone models is an indication of success, Microsoft would already killed of all the competition with dozens Windows Mobile models.

And when WM7 releases, again, it will have dozens of models.
by sent2null July 8, 2009 9:06 PM PDT
@rrodd

You obviously haven't coded on the Android platform, it has the most elegant API I've ever seen and I've coded on API's from C++ to Java for different platforms and devices. I can't claim personal experience with Iphone coding but I often read of issues developing for it, where yours is the first ever comment I've seen with that charge levied against the Android, so it is naturally suspect.
Reply to this comment
by TyDiz July 8, 2009 11:05 PM PDT
I wouldn't say elegant...it does blend with the java API's really well, but its still has some extremely weird quirks and inconsistencies that is a serious pain sometimes...But on the same regard, there is a lot of really good things about the API that I really like...I just wish they would fix the missing documentation that they have all over the place(usually the stuff I need to look up :S)
by U. Tripps July 8, 2009 9:44 PM PDT
With so many competitors for the iPhone coming out, I'm starting to be very happy that have been locked into a T-Mobile contract for a couple of years. When it is over, I'll have my pick of lots of great devices--not just the iPhone with its ridiculous AT&T exclusivity.
Reply to this comment
by uhpl508 July 8, 2009 10:30 PM PDT
The price compared is a little misleading because the Tmobile package includes text messages not included with the iPhone, realistically, its $15 difference. $20 vs. $35
Reply to this comment
by mojoscow July 9, 2009 12:29 AM PDT
i love apple i have a macbook pro and an 80GB ipod... however when it comes to the iphone i just have to disagree with it.. i am not a fan of it at all HTC makes such better phones... you will see one day when every major manufacturer has an android enabled phone. androids operating systym will be more popular than iphone.. because when it comes to iphone you only get one choice and that is the iphone.. with Android you could pick a Samsung or Sony or HTC and im sure Motorola will make one as well and nokia but i know for sure Sony and Samsung are releasing one or two soon. and the hard ware on them is better than that of the iphone plus androids operating system is better. so you are getting the better of two worlds
Reply to this comment
by anilsudh July 9, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
HaHaHa!!! Your post is beyond funny. Laughing my guts out.
by a_flores July 9, 2009 3:11 AM PDT
Ugly. Look is not essential but important.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (81 Comments)

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right