• On GameFAQs: What causes the Red Ring of Death?
July 7, 2009 4:00 AM PDT

FAQ: How to vanquish mobile spam

by Elinor Mills

I got my first SMS spam message last week and it infuriated me.

The mortgage-related text message was more than just a nuisance, like e-mail spam is. It also was a strong indication of how marketers have managed to invade every private communication space consumers have.

And it was frustrating that I didn't know what to do about it. Being an AT&T customer, I tried to register on AT&T's site figuring I could learn what to do and take action there. Unfortunately, it kept telling me that it didn't recognize my password, so I had to call customer support. The support representative directed me to a different URL where I was able to log in and she tried to walk me through the site to the place where I could set spam-blocking settings, but was unable to because of some technical issue on her end. So she just changed the settings for me.

I called the four major U.S. wireless carriers to find out exactly what they suggest their customers do when they get SMS spam. Here is what they said, along with some other basic questions and answers people may have about mobile spam.

AT&T
Customers can block text messages or calls from a specific phone number on its Web site here, as well as restrict the sources of e-mail that reach your phone on this site. Customers can also reply to text messages by typing in "BLOCK" or "STOP" to prevent future messages from that sender, and call a customer service representative if further help is needed, said AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel.

Sprint
Sprint wants customers to call customer service to report all spam messages so the company can modify its spam-filtering technology to block the phone numbers that are sending it, said Sprint spokesman John Taylor. Customers should not reply to the messages, otherwise it verifies to the spammer that the phone number is valid, he said.

T-Mobile
Postpaid and FlexPay customers can create their own filters and block chargeable text messages, MMS (multi-media service) messages, instant messages, and e-mail from being sent to their phones by calling customer service, spokeswoman Cara Walker said.

Verizon
Customers can log into the site and sign up for Usage Controls ($4.99 a month) that allow them to block certain numbers from calling or sending text messages to the phone. And if customers text only with a few people they can create an alias address here for free and receive only text messages sent to that address, said Verizon spokeswoman Debra Lewis.

Verizon has filed eight to 10 lawsuits against SMS spammers over the past four to five years, and 20 lawsuits altogether involving telemarketers, she said.

What can I do to prevent unsolicited phone calls to my mobile phone?
To block spam phone calls, customers should register their mobile numbers with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's Do Not Call Registry.

What are the carriers doing to block spam?
The mobile service providers said they are using antispam filters and antivirus technology to protect against the different types of mobile spam. They did not want to go into too much detail as to what technologies they are using.

Why am I getting spam?
Some people may be inadvertently opting in to receive text messages when they sign up for other services with merchants. Many free ringtone download sites are used to harvest mobile numbers. Spammers also use auto-dialers that randomly generate numbers or try them sequentially. Because mobile phone numbers do not appear in public directories people should be careful who they share their numbers with. Be wary of sites that promise to remove numbers from spam lists because they are often set up to collect the numbers instead. Also, read terms and conditions of sites and services carefully before giving out a mobile number.

Do I get charged for spam messages?
In general, consumers will not be charged for spam text messages and can get a credit if they report it to the company, on a case-by-case basis.

Is spam illegal?
While Verizon is suing companies for violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to use an auto-dialer to make calls to wireless phones, there is no explicit measure outlawing SMS spam, yet. Measures in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate were introduced this year to rectify that. The m-SPAM Act, introduced by Sens. Olympia Snowe, a Maine Republican, and Bill Nelson, a Democrat from Florida, would expand the regulatory authority of the Federal Communications Commission and the FTC to intervene against SMS spammers and would explicitly bar marketers from sending text messages to any mobile number in the national Do Not Call registry. A similar measure was introduced by Rep. Phil Gingrey, a Georgia Democrat, in March after his antispam effort last year failed.

How big a problem is this?
While people in the U.S. might receive two SMS spam messages a year, things are worse in other countries like Europe where one a week is typical; India where people receive as many as two per day; and China where it's more like five to 10 each day, according to Ferris Research. Last year, Ferris Research estimated that wireless users in the U.S. received more than 1.1 billion spam text messages in 2007, up 38 percent from 2006.

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Wireless
Initial Motorola Droid sales look good
Sprint to cut 2,000 to 2,500 jobs
Report: Clearwire gets more cash from investors
Nokia recalls 14 million chargers
New Verizon ad calls iPhone 'misfit toy'
Apple said to be working on 'world mode' iPhone
Is Verizon's new early-termination fee anti-consumer?
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (47 Comments)
by briceorbryce July 7, 2009 5:44 AM PDT
I've gotten a few of them. Pisses me off because our family plan doesn't include unlimited text messages.
Reply to this comment
by dc5trust July 7, 2009 2:39 PM PDT
That really sucks! I would be pretty darn pissed that I'm getting charged for something I didnt want in the first place.
by 4score20 July 7, 2009 6:11 AM PDT
Unfortunately I don't think there are private communication spaces anymore. Where there are people there will be spammers/advertisers. We track them in like mud or poop on our shoes.
Reply to this comment
by Truckdrvr July 7, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
Great analogy!
by Dr. Zzz July 11, 2009 1:04 PM PDT
Sounds like we need Antivirus - but for phone numbers? A database of bad phone numbers + and detection loaded on your phone. check www.numbercop.com They are trying to do exactly that.
by Ronny_aggr July 7, 2009 6:13 AM PDT
I was frustrated by the same but later on used available mobile security solutions in the market like of Smobile Systems security shield and it worked smooth.
Reply to this comment
by jeraymondjr July 7, 2009 6:33 AM PDT
You have to love it when a company like AT&T directs you to a site where you can subscribe to an additional service. Moreover, that service only allows you to block up to 15 numbers at a time. It's a handy service, of course. However, it's purpose is to allow parents to set limits on their kid's cell phone usage. The service is not meant to be a defense against spam messages. We're at the point now where phones are smart enough to allow this function natively. There are "unofficial" applications available. Of course, these apps are a threat to services AT&T can charge for on a monthly basis.
Reply to this comment
by ralfthedog July 7, 2009 9:14 AM PDT
"We're at the point now where phones are smart enough to allow this function natively. There are "unofficial" applications available. Of course, these apps are a threat to services AT&T can charge for on a monthly basis."

Can a phone refuse a text message? I would think that the billing takes place on the server level. If they send you a text message you will get billed for it.

Am I wrong?
by TheVanilaGorilla July 7, 2009 6:52 AM PDT
I also get pissed off when I receive SPAM Text message since I get charged 20 cents a message. I didn't want to deactivate text messaging since I occasionally do send a text message but I don't send nearly enough to sign up for text messaging. What gets me paranoid is if spammers will start sending text messages like spam emails...i.e. suddenly I have 500+ messages at 20 cents a pop. Yeah, I am sure my service would credit me, but it would be a hassle.
Reply to this comment
by troyrader July 7, 2009 7:09 AM PDT
I was getting 1 or 2 per day on all 3 home cell phones. Sprint offered to block all texts as we do not have a text plan and do not plan to any time soon. They also credited the most recent set of charges for the spam texts.
Reply to this comment
by Eddie-c July 7, 2009 8:15 AM PDT
How effective is this really going to be though given that SMS can be sent from any computer, spoof mobile numbers or simply bluejack? And with these "spam companies", e.g. the car warranty ones often using spoofed numbers it's going to be rather difficult for the end user to find the real number to then file a complaint??!

Re China & SMS, they recently passed a law limiting the number of SMS per day to something like 2000 ... so that's reaally going to slow things down eh? ;)
Reply to this comment
by EdCenter July 7, 2009 9:32 AM PDT
well why not call up the company (that is responsible for the SMS spam) and raise hell. The number in the article doesn't appear valid (I assume to protect CNet from defamation). But actual spam probably has real numbers that you can call and whale away at. Let me know if I'm wrong and if these SMS spams are sent for the sole purpose of ticking people off.
by Eddie-c July 7, 2009 10:40 AM PDT
Because the number that is shown is often an invalid number or does not accept calls. If you hit 1 (or whatever option) to be put through to a rep they will either hang up on you if you tell them to stop or will not provide any information about them, the company name, location etc etc etc.

I support 2000 people and have had quite a few come to me about these junk calls & spams and there is little that, realistically, can be done about it. Sure, the FCC recently "slapped" a couple of companies who were doing the car-warranty scam but they just pop back up and, if they're outside the US the FCC can't do a damn thing.

And yes, sometimes SMS spams can be deliberate just like e-bombs ... I had a VP who received >500 SMS in 1 hour.
by csetzer July 13, 2009 1:25 PM PDT
What might be more effective is to "wail" on the companies that are paying the spammers to spam, such as the aforementioned mortgage company.
by joeltom July 7, 2009 9:09 AM PDT
Thanks for nothing, Verizon. Always an extra charge to not get something you don't want....
Reply to this comment
by baggyguy1218 July 7, 2009 9:16 AM PDT
I have T-Mobile and they will not deactivate SMS or Email to phone number. I have called and tried but they just tell me they have no system to accomplish that. I think its wrong that they will not deactivate SMS for customers that do not use it.
Reply to this comment
by Eddie-c July 7, 2009 10:41 AM PDT
Yet another of many reasons why T-Mobile is the cruddiest in the US.
by cayhorstmann July 7, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
If you have a T-Mobile flex plan, it's easy enough not to get text messages. They start you out with a $5 credit. Just let it run out and don't fill it up. No more text messages. Sure, T-Mobile sucks, but they all suck. At least with the flex plan, you don't have the indignity of being held hostage by a 2 year plan.
by redskins5926 July 7, 2009 6:05 PM PDT
You can block SMS and emails to your phone on T-Mobile using the My T-Mobile feature of their website! Just login to My T-Mobile and go to change services. Under the SMS package options are the options to block all chargeable messages for free. You can do this for either all or particular lines for family plan users. I did this and it works great.

So no need to call customer service. I don't know how the CNET article missed this option above.
by baggyguy1218 August 20, 2009 4:42 PM PDT
I have recently upgraded to the MyTouch and T-Mobile now has the ability to block All SMS to a specific number.
by jhacker July 7, 2009 9:20 AM PDT
Leave it up to Verizon to charge you to avoid charges on your bill. Yah, they want $5 per line to limit the number of text messages on my shared lines. I'm better off signing up for unlimited text messages, and they know that!! Verizon's service is great, but their costs are 'through the roof'!
Reply to this comment
by jscott418 July 7, 2009 10:26 AM PDT
I just think its wrong to have to pay for a service to prevent something that you never ask for in the first place. It would be like the post office charging you postage for junk mail! I would rather that the cell phone companies allow you to create a blacklist of numbers to be blocked. After all why tie up their system with bogus messages all the time. Eventually they would just give up. I think this problem will just get worse as more people drop landline phones and switch to cell. The problem is cell phone numbers are now becoming more available to spammers because of this.
Reply to this comment
by happygolucky101lol July 7, 2009 12:36 PM PDT
Shame on Verizon for making us pay $5/month to block spam [as specified above], I formerly received spam calls almost one a week, until I registered on the Do Not Call. I am on AT&T, and I was the only person in my family receiving the calls.
Reply to this comment
by Doctor Who July 7, 2009 8:58 PM PDT
Agreed. I am not happy with the fact that Verizon wants to charge you something that they should offer, free, to customers. I would think offering it for free would be a real incentive to other potential customers.
by Been_there_Saw_it_before July 7, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
Where is big government when you need it?

Let the FTC, FBI, and NSA do the snooping and backtrack the spam to its source and then shutoff the few computers involved. Why must I endure 1000 spam messages a day?
Reply to this comment
by vapetlover July 7, 2009 3:54 PM PDT
I get at least 1-2 messages a week...............from my provider, AT&T!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by TomWeiss July 7, 2009 4:13 PM PDT
Although with Verizon usage controls can be used to block unwanted messages (among other useful things), this is not the only option. Spam controls, provided for free, will also accomplish this. See this URL for more information::

http://support.vzw.com/faqs/Features%20and%20Optional%20Services/spam_controls.html
Reply to this comment
by Doctor Who July 7, 2009 9:02 PM PDT
I wasn't aware of this, thank you for the link!
by Bemused51 July 7, 2009 4:49 PM PDT
What makes it doubly aggravating is the practice of US telecoms of charging to both send and receive text messages, along with phone calls.

In most of the world, only the sender is charged
Reply to this comment
by SLIPPYSLOPE July 7, 2009 5:21 PM PDT
<things are worse in other countries like Europe where one a week is typical>
I thought that European mobile phone regulations are set so that the 'caller' pays charges to a mobile phone, the same as with land phones and to eliminate the mobile phone user from being charged for unsolicited calls. I have no idea if the regulations for text messages are similar but I was thought that the EU regulation on mobile phone usage was much better than the US (I'm not speaking of costs, merely the logic of who pays for usage - the caller or the called).
Reply to this comment
by Larry Adams July 7, 2009 5:21 PM PDT
Why should I have to pay to block SMS spam? I've been signed up on the DNC list for over a year and STILL get advertising calls and SMS spam on my cell phone. My carrier is not doing enough to block this garbage (that I have to pay to receive, no less). If we can block unwanted calls on landlines, why can't that technology be ported to wireless phones? Probably because the carriers don't want to give up that revenue from the spammers
Reply to this comment
by SLIPPYSLOPE July 7, 2009 5:31 PM PDT
Larry, and they know that 'you - the customer' won't make the call to customer service to have a 30¢ charge removed and they, therefore, get to keep the revenue. It's just a numbers game: one or two spam text messages per week times millions of mobile phone users adds up to a significant annual revenue. Our 'government' is supposed to 'protect' us but when you have huge telecommunications giants with huge lobbing budgets contributing to the re-election campaigns of our elected representatives who write the laws regulating the tel-co's, who do you think is going to come out on top, the user or the service provider? It's what you get when government gets into bed with giant corporations - 'We the People' lose out. How is your Stimulus Plan working out?
by B14ion July 7, 2009 5:36 PM PDT
$4.99 a month for Usage Controls?! Verizon found another way to charge people.
Reply to this comment
by pedal-pusher July 7, 2009 5:57 PM PDT
Luckily with Sprint, you can create a permissions list that only allows text messages from up to 50 numbers/sources that you submit. No charges, no fees. Just SPAM free messaging! You can find this at Sprint.com in the 'Digital Lounge' and Messaging.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (47 Comments)

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right