• On TV.com: BATTLESTAR Galactica Maxim Photoshoot
June 18, 2009 7:30 AM PDT

Teen cheating morphs with new tech, poll shows

by Lance Whitney

Parents have yet another reason for a long, hard talk with their kids. More than half of teens admit to using the Internet to cheat, a new poll shows, while 35 percent say they've used their cell phones.

The results were released Thursday by Common Sense Media, which commissioned research firm Benenson Strategy Group to conduct the poll.

The report (PDF) uncovered several alarming trends. More than 38 percent of teens say they've copied content from the Internet and presented it as their own work, while 21 percent have downloaded an actual paper to turn in as their own. Around 65 percent say they've seen other students cheat on tests using their cell phones.

(Credit: Common Sense Media)

Many teens don't even see this behavior as wrong, according to the poll. Among those asked, 36 percent say that downloading a paper from the Internet was not a serious offense; 42 percent believe that copying text from Web sites was either a minor offense or not cheating at all. And 22 percent of those asked didn't feel that reading from notes on a cell phone during a test is cheating.

(Credit: Common Sense Media)

"Cell phones and the Internet have been a real game-changer for education and have opened up many avenues for collaboration, creation, and communication," said James Steyer, CEO and founder of Common Sense Media. "But as this poll shows, the unintended consequence of these versatile technologies is that they've made cheating easier."

Parents may also be naive in thinking that while other kids cheat, their own don't. The poll found that 92 percent of parents believe cell phone cheating happens at their kids' schools, but only 3 percent believe their own teen has ever used a cell phone to cheat. And 79 percent of parents say that kids download papers from the Internet as their own work, but only 7 percent believe their own teen has ever done this.

Common Sense Media offers the following tips for parents:

• Do your homework. Be aware of the technology that kids use every day.

• Don't assume that kids automatically know what's right or wrong. They need you to set the rules.

• Review school policies with them.

• Address the issue with your kids so the consequences of cheating are fully understood.

Common Sense Media's site offers additional advice to help parents deal with this issue.

To conduct the poll, Benenson interviewed 2,015 students and parents across the U.S. in May and early June. The margin of error is about 3 percent.

Lance Whitney wears a few different technology hats--journalist, Web developer, and software trainer. He's a contributing editor for Microsoft TechNet Magazine and writes for other computer publications and Web sites. You can follow Lance on Twitter at @lancewhit. Lance is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and he is not an employee of CNET.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Wireless
Initial Motorola Droid sales look good
Sprint to cut 2,000 to 2,500 jobs
Report: Clearwire gets more cash from investors
Nokia recalls 14 million chargers
New Verizon ad calls iPhone 'misfit toy'
Apple said to be working on 'world mode' iPhone
Is Verizon's new early-termination fee anti-consumer?
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (42 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by lkrupp June 18, 2009 7:49 AM PDT
Disgusting. And, of course, these same teens think downloading music without paying for it is not stealing either. But the blame lies squarely with the parents for not teaching their children to behave in an ethical manner. American pop culture is debased and degenerate. We now reap what we have sown.
Reply to this comment
by whobob June 18, 2009 9:57 AM PDT
It not stealing to download a song but it is copyright infringement. Not the same thing at all . Note I am not justifying copyrigt infringement but don't buy into the record industies it is stealing argument.
I personally have never downloaded a song of used pirated software. I have owned a commercial software developement company . Most people who pirate softaware are not potential customers. Most who have a legitimate need for the software will pay for it (in my experience).
by fmcentire June 18, 2009 9:59 AM PDT
Yet when you made VHS copies of your favorite movies in the 90's regardless of the big FBI warning you didn't view it as stealing either.... How funny.
by viper396 June 18, 2009 11:48 AM PDT
whobob, your just splitting hairs and trying to argue semantics. If you obtain something that has value but don't properly pay for it that is stealing. Whether you want to call it copyright infringement or outright stealing the ethical and moral implications are the same and you are justing trying to make personal excuses for it. Your excuses are no better then those idiot kids who cheat their way thru school. They may have passed their tests but they ultimately learned nothing. Years later when those same kids are just scrapping by in life and upset at all the successfull people who pass them by the tangible implications of cheating are apparent.
by monkeyfun14 June 18, 2009 1:28 PM PDT
Where in the hell was pirating mentioned in this article?
by Heebee Jeebies June 18, 2009 11:14 PM PDT
I think a lot of the blame also lies with the the world in general. When everything is disposable and everything is at ones beck and call through the internet, it gets to be a really hard to convince those that know how to use it (especially young people) that what seems to be the rule isn't and that it is actually wrong.

When you get right down to it with corporate greed and corruption, theft of copyrighted material by not only by people downloading music and movies but companies like Google that think they can use whatever their software finds on the internet (like stuff from newspaper sites, images from people flicker and other photo sites, etc.) without having to worry about copyright and the in general low morals of people these days with a nice bit of everything is disposable what's important is having THINGS. It is not wonder this kind of stuff isn't seen as wrong.

When a company like Google feels they can do what they won't without repercussions what's copying a little text off the web for a report? Nothing really. When mortgage companies can shaft people with home loans and credit card companies can give people without jobs credit cards with $20,000 credit limits and then when it all falls in like the house of cards that it is and the government comes and bails them out, why should teens feel that using technology to help them with their school work isn't cheating. Hell, they have been allowing students to use calculators in math classes for at least 3 decades. That's cheating too.

I say <SHRUG> it doesn't matter. With text messaging and IM destroying English and all of the other things sucking human kind in to the toilet what's a little plagiarism or cheating. You can't very well scold the kinds for being cheats and crooks and liers when those running the world, governments and corporations are ones too.

Robert
by tm_anon June 19, 2009 2:29 AM PDT
@viper396

The act of taking feloniously the personal property of
another without his consent and knowledge; theft; larceny.

Now, if I obtain software by any means, does the original owner not still have the original copy? If I obtain an MP3 or a record or a cassette tape or a CD, they are all just copies. I haven't taken any property, I've made a copy.

It's not splitting hairs if there's a real difference. whobob is right, it's copyright infringement but it's far from theft.
by darkxeno June 18, 2009 8:00 AM PDT
Like everything when a new technology comes out people will use it to their own benefit.
Hell at one time a calculator was considered cheating. Next you are going to see a survey about college students that cheat when doing online classes. The info is there they will use it.
Reply to this comment
by twitchin2021 June 22, 2009 9:04 PM PDT
I'm actually a university student who is currently taking an online course so it's funny you should mention this. Our instructor/institution has been smart enough to realize that people will use the resources available to them to achieve their goals and so the course has been designed in such a way to encourage using the web and referencing class texts while taking tests and whatnot.
by dmm June 18, 2009 8:06 AM PDT
Where are the teachers when kids are texting to get answers, and photographing tests?
Reply to this comment
by darkxeno June 18, 2009 8:19 AM PDT
they are sends tweets on their own cell phones..
by -Oneota- June 18, 2009 8:28 AM PDT
Checking their Facebook profiles...duh!
by nicksilvestri June 18, 2009 10:34 AM PDT
oh they don't notice!
by masonx June 18, 2009 5:09 PM PDT
Or, the college they work for may have forced them to take on a double load of class hours and six times the normal student loads. My wife went from a contract requirement of 15 hrs. (five classes/semester) to having to teach 26hrs. even with her being a full professor and tenured - to stay in the good graces of a very vindictive and unprofessional administration. That's 9 classes covering 3-4 different course subjects and a student population of over 400 students on occasions - usually the larger classes are just below 60 per class. At 60 or more, the college is required to pay double hours pay. Funny she never gets more than 59.

Colleges - especially non-Ivy League type colleges these days are really struggling economically with more than budget cuts. Most of their administrators have no formal business training and are simply incompetent in managing an educational institution in a practical and business like way. These traditional bricks and mortar institutions are now competing head on for enrollment with online institutions who have a fraction of the over head costs and are rapidly becoming more popular with students than traditional classroom courses. Because of the lack of professional management skills in most college administrations, they fail to recognize that their business model is non-competitive, all the while continuing to build more and more un-needed classrooms and auditoriums (often a case of administrative ego and empire building), even as budgets shrink and enrollments are lost to online institutions. Overhead costs for all that bricks and mortar maintenance continues to rise such that few colleges today have adequate maintenance staffs for even the most basic repairs. In my wife's case it isn't uncommon for her to drag her classes from classroom to classroom trying to find a working projection system. Today faculty find they are the ones sacrificing class prep-support resources and work twice the hours for the same pay to help the administration pay for the overhead.

Even so you won't find a student sitting in the back of the crowd of 59 in my wife's classes texting. Her tests - except the final are all open book. Too easy you say. No, she has near perfect bell shape curves of test scores from A's to F's.. The tests are designed so that only people very familiar with the text can find the materials necessary to determine the answers. The final consists of a battery of questions that are randomized by topic - so that each topic is evenly represented and then there are multiple layout variations of each tests set of questions - re-randomized each semester such that the odds of two students sitting side by side having the same tests are slim. You can't keep students from ever cheating. You can make it difficult. Educators also need to consider the pragmatic side - if a student cheats and has not learned the material, they will ultimately, pay the price when they are unable to advance without that knowledge. Or, they are caught and dismissed. If however, the student cheats, advances and the cheating never costs him anything - perhaps we are teaching information that simply are not needed.

It should be quite clear to even the dullest education administrators and planners that in a world where our information doubles every five years, the education system and what it teaches will have to constantly and carefully sorted so that students get the basics for critical thinking and the methods they need to source information necessary to solve problems quickly, creatively and efficiently. We need administrations more focused on this kind of educational process, method and material prioritization and less on monument building. Folks as far as I can see in the colleges I have regular contact with - this isn't happening anywhere in the US and until it does things are just going to get worse in our schools.
by bonesbautista June 18, 2009 8:25 AM PDT
As some old fart - nearing 50 - who did pretty well in school, I spent hundreds of hours writing papers. I'd be just thrilled to have a computer to type - I still have an old Royal typewriter that collects dust, and that would have been great to have but didn't pick it up until I was in college. These kids have PCs and a means to share with each other even when they're grounded if they need to connect for group projects, and virtual libraries that never run out of the media they need.

Some feel the need to cheat, even with all the advantages I never had in school - and I thought I had it good in the 70s? Sheesh.
Reply to this comment
by drewbyh June 18, 2009 9:44 AM PDT
We always talk about in society how important it is to work in a team. This isn't really any different. If a person asks someone for an answer and they give it then it's a team effort. What's wrong with that. Instead of trying to control all of the students actions let them branch out with technology and see what happens. The only way to completely control cheating is to have each student strip down and take the test in an empty room by themselves with only a pencil and their underwear. My guess, however, is they will still figure out a way to get around it.
Reply to this comment
by fmcentire June 18, 2009 10:02 AM PDT
Answers on the underwear tag.
by karpenterskids June 18, 2009 12:16 PM PDT
Sadly, I know some teachers who are sooo strict, they almost do pat-downs on kids who walk in to take the test.

It stems from a lack of trust.
Or perhaps from being abandoned by their parents at an early age. lol
by nate_ec June 18, 2009 9:48 AM PDT
Perhaps it is time to realize that the entire education system as a whole is a farce. Memorizing formulas and history dates doesn't make you smart. What is smart is cheating, using collectivity, tools and technologies to solve a problem. I applaud these kids for cheating. In the real world it is the tenacious that excel, not the over educated bookworm types that where institutionalized by the education system long before.
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids June 18, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
Wow...while I don't completely agree, that's actually a smart (and true) way to look at it!

Cheating is still wrong (obviously) because it's a rule established by wherever you go to school...so you have to respect that...but if you CAN get away with cheating, you're definitely smart in your own way.

Heck, you might even be cut out to do some undercover police work when you're older...sleight-of-hand and stealth is very important there. :)
by fmcentire June 18, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
There aren't many situations in the real world where you are completley isolated and on your own, yet nearly every form of testing in this country is exam based, straight from memory on your own. If you really want to test someone's abilities give them a project or problem and see how well they do with it. I've never had a situation at work that required me to read a chapter out of a book and solve a problem from memory. The testing methods of our education system are ancient and need to be revised, because they obviously aren't working in this day and age.
Reply to this comment
by Michichael June 18, 2009 10:03 AM PDT
Agreed. Our education system should teach people HOW to think, not WHAT to think. Give them a situation, and let them use any resources they can to solve it. If they don't do well, examine how they used their resources and teach them a better way of using them.

that way kids understand how to solve the problem instead of just remembering an answer.
by karpenterskids June 18, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
I TOTALLY agree.

Memorizing dry formulas is way over-rated.
In real life, you really don't need to know all that stuff.
Besides, if you really need to use it, you can always look it up.

We need a revision in the way we think...I just wish I knew what the answer was.
by sythara June 18, 2009 2:25 PM PDT
karpenterskids

How old are you? 16 or something?
by karpenterskids June 19, 2009 1:48 PM PDT
No, I'm not 16.
But thanks for asking.

</sarcasm>
by Gromit801 June 18, 2009 10:03 AM PDT
Check out Yahoo Answers. FULL of kids asking questions straight out of tests they're taking, wanting other to do their work for them.
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids June 18, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
Nah, most of those questions (from what I've seen, anyways) are from Homework problems.

When you're taking a test, it's impossible to type out each question, sort it into a category, and wait for people to work each one out and respond to it. Especially if you don't want to be seen.
by Magallanes June 18, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
text copied from a book : YAY
text copied from Internet :NAY

why?.
Reply to this comment
by sythara June 18, 2009 2:25 PM PDT
Because internet is evil
by twitchin2021 June 22, 2009 9:16 PM PDT
Because most of the text on the internet is wrong :P

Actually, text copied from the internet isn't "NAY", it's treated the same way text copied from a book is. If it's cited correctly, then no problem, at least in my experience.
by myles taylor June 18, 2009 10:55 AM PDT
THe problem is not with kids using technology to cheat; the problem is with our education system and standardized testing. It's so screwed up that it's really not cheating to "cheat". I think people should learn however they can.
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids June 18, 2009 12:25 PM PDT
The problem with cheating is that you don't truly learn it most of the time...you simply find the answer, write it down, and then move on and forget about it.


I agree, though...standardized tests are wayyy over-rated.
by Raabscuttle June 18, 2009 10:55 AM PDT
So what difference from this to what I did in school 20 years ago? They're copying from a website instead of an encyclopedia. They're grabbing their papers from the Internet instead of the library. They text message instead of passing notes? (ok, I never cheated at tests, or helped others to do that - those I could ace).,.. My point is that cheating has always gone on and will continue to go on - it is just the methods have changed somewhat.
Reply to this comment
by sythara June 18, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
Exactly. I remember putting notes of stuff inside a transparent pen that I could rotate the paper inside to read the notes and such... now people are simply less creative as they let others invent ways to cheat on tests for them.
by Ngallendou June 18, 2009 11:05 AM PDT
What are we testing? Memory? Or ability to come up with a useful answer? In the courses I teach, I tell students that they are free to employ their books, notes, computer, whatever, within a time period, to come up with the best answer they can. Their acquired understanding of the course provides the criteria by which they an I evaluate their answers, not the manner in which they came up with them. If I get identical answers from some students, then we may have a chat together about the weaknesses of depending on a single source of information. Thus, we teach content, technology, communication, teamwork and a clear sense of community.
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids June 18, 2009 12:26 PM PDT
+1
by sythara June 18, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
What about flat out copying someone elses work in cases such as writing reports?
by marc_90292 June 18, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
I understand your guys' concern about cheating and I mostly agree.
But there is a nagging feeling in me that stems from my own day to day experience, for lack of a better word.
I have come to the point that I consider Google my external expanded memory. And YouTube etc.
Hardly a day goes by where I do not consult the Internet from spell check to translation to background info to you name it.
Sure, it is not the same. Or is it?
Reply to this comment
by Deathjester0 June 18, 2009 12:27 PM PDT
OK, I am generation Y and ended up being a huge cheater in high school. Yes, I learned a lot about how to delegate, how to come up with solutions, and how to problem solve in the simplest of terms. The problem is, to this day I cannot do algebra and above because I cheated so much. I think there can be a synergy here with using technology in education and different testing techniques but there will be no substitute for the actual accumulation of knowledge. Working as a team is great but sometimes there are situations where the whole team is made up of idiots and high-school cheaters so somebody has to know something.

I'd hate to see a resume that says:

I'm able to do anything from welding to complex gantt charts as long as I have an internet connection and access to the world wide web. But if the power goes out and I'm on a desktop I can stand there and look stupid until someone else comes a long who actually learned something.

Oh, and the teachers are just getting lazy. I can lock down a classroom. How about having everyone turn off your cell-phones. Then, we will just revert back to the low-tech methods we all know and love. Oh, and parents are coddling their kids with cell phones and data plans and justifying them in the classroom. Do they really need that much at school or should they focus on learning?

Resourcefullness is only one aspect of intelligence.

Oh and if you were wondering why my spelling or grammer is incorrect it is because I cheated in school when I was a kid.

Best Regards,
Derek
Reply to this comment
by anyport June 18, 2009 1:14 PM PDT
I agree that memorization is not education. Education should provide us with the tools to solve problems and understand the world around us. If students get the answers to problems without understanding the concepts, they will lack the tools to analyze and solve future problems. If you don't understand history and other cultures (I'm not talking about memorizing dates and names), you are likely to make the same mistakes as your predecessors. We've seen more than enough of that in our politics.

On the other hand, you may be exceptionally qualified to text your friends while asking "ya want fires with that?"
Reply to this comment
by anyport June 18, 2009 1:18 PM PDT
fries ... that is
Reply to this comment
by twitchin2021 June 22, 2009 9:14 PM PDT
Has anyone given thought to the idea that maybe it's come time to redefine what it means to "cheat"? In a day and age where so many people have such open access to social networking tools, research materials, and an incalculable amount of instant information perhaps it's not such a bad thing that students are using them. Yes, obviously, copying someone else's work is unacceptable, but using a cellphone to check a website for information to solve a problem seems pretty legitimate to me. Education systems in the western world have become so preoccupied with analyzing how effectively students can retain and regurgitate facts that it's neglecting to encourage them to creatively seek out solutions to problems or to act as they would in the real world when asked to prepare a report of some sort. If I were asked by my boss to write up a report on the benefits of drinking milk over water who would expect me to do it from memory? Isn't it more useful that I have developed the ability to seek out, digest, and reformulate information form a variety of places and collaborate with peers to create a report that is accurate and well presented? I don't know, maybe I'm way off the mark, but that comment someone else made about how using calculators used to be considered cheating is resonating with me right about now.
Reply to this comment
(42 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right