• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
June 11, 2009 4:00 AM PDT

Yes, Virginia, the DTV transition still isn't over

by Marguerite Reardon

In less than 24 hours all full-power broadcast TV stations in the U.S. will flip a switch to stop broadcasting their analog TV signals and will only broadcast TV signals in digital. And for millions who are unprepared, it could mean lights out on their favorite TV shows.

I know what you're thinking. "We've heard this before." In fact, you've probably been hearing about the transition to digital television for the last decade. You likely started seeing public service commercials last year encouraging you to buy a digital converter box to turn your old analog TV into one that could receive digital signals.

In early February another supposed deadline loomed. And then it didn't happen. Congress, fearing that too many people weren't prepared, postponed the switch, and more than 6 million procrastinators were saved.

But now the new deadline of June 12 is upon us once again. And this time it's for real. President Obama himself issued a statement last week:

"We have worked hand in hand with state and local officials, broadcasters and community groups to educate and assist millions of Americans with the transition...I want to be clear: there will not be another delay."

So here we are, less than a day away from the final transition. And despite months of public service announcements and more than $2 billion spent by the U.S. government to help people prepare, millions will still face a blank screen when they hit that little power button on their TV remotes starting Friday at 12:01 a.m.

The good news is that delaying the switch from February to June has given the Federal Communications Commission some time to ramp up efforts to get the public prepared. The agency has enlisted the help of dozens of groups including volunteers from AmeriCorps, civil rights groups, and even firefighters to help people purchase and install their converter boxes and antennas.

Congress also kicked in additional cash, about $650 million on top of the $1.5 billion that had already been allocated for DTV readiness. The bulk of the $650 million was given to the Commerce Department to fund its voucher program. And Congress authorized $90 million of the $650 million to be used by the FCC for outreach programs. So far, the FCC has received $65.7 million of that money, and the Commerce Department has authorized another $9.65 million to help pay for call centers that are in place to address consumers' questions and concerns.

The Commerce Department has been issuing $40 vouchers to help people pay for the new equipment necessary to turn their older analog TVs into ones that can receive digital TV signals. But just before the February deadline, money for the program ran dry and more than 2.5 million people were left on a waiting list for vouchers.

In its most recent report to the FCC, representatives from the Commerce Department said that the program is in good shape, and there is enough money in the program to provide vouchers to all households that still need them until the final deadline of July 31.

It looks as though these last ditch efforts to prepare Americans for the DTV switch have made a big difference. The number of households that are unprepared for the June 12 transition has been cut in half from what it was in February, according to the Nielsen Co., which has been tracking the number of households prepared for the transition

But even though most people are prepared, millions will still not have access to TV on June 12. In its final update before the June 12 deadline, Nielsen reported that 2.8 million American households, or 2.5 percent of the television market, are completely unready for the transition. As of the end of May, another 9 million homes that subscribe to cable or satellite services but that have spare television sets, in bedrooms or kitchens and that are not connected to a paid TV service, are expected to lose reception.

Vulnerable markets
The FCC has targeted 49 markets that it considers particularly vulnerable. These markets include New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, Miami, Boston, and Dallas-Fort Worth. Aside from inner cities where many low-income people live, people living in rural areas, particularly in the West where fewer subscribe to cable and satellite services, are the least prepared for the transition, according to Nielsen's latest report.

Acting Federal Communications Chairman Michael Copps has said that he is pleased and impressed by the cross-agency and volunteer group collaboration and cooperation over the past few months.

"In January I feared where we were headed with this transition," he said during a recent public meeting. "But it has turned into an inspiring and enjoyable experience to see how these different agencies can work together. "

He also acknowledged that many people will still face problems during the transition.

"Even though we are better prepared this time," he said. "There will still be disruptions for some consumers. And candor compels us to inform viewers of these issues."

Not only are some households completely unprepared, but officials also say that millions of people who have already bought converter boxes and/or antennas will still experience problems, such as poor reception. These problems may occur from improperly installed antennas or people using the wrong kind of antenna for their region. But it may also be due to the fact that digital signals travel differently through the air than analog signals. So some TV viewers who may have been able to tune in analog channels may not be able to receive digital channels.

Because many TV broadcasters have already been transmitting some or all of their channels already in digital, some viewers who made the switch early and are watching digital TV should rescan their boxes. And they may need to readjust their antennas to get signals after June 12. The reason for this is because some stations will have to move some digital channels when spectrum is vacated. And some broadcasters may also be broadcasting the signals at different power levels to avoid interference.

To help answer questions and deal with confused and frustrated TV viewers before and after the transition, the FCC has staffed nearly 4,000 call centers at a cost of more than $40 million. The voucher program, which provides up to two $40 coupons per household to help defray the cost of digital converter boxes, will also be extended to July 31.

The switch to broadcasting in digital instead of in analog was mandated to free up wireless spectrum so that it could be used for other purposes. Digital signals use up far less spectrum than analog signals. The FCC has already auctioned off the spare spectrum in its 700MHz auction, which raised $19.6 billion for the government.

This auction generated more revenue for the government than any other wireless auction the FCC has ever held. Not a bad tradeoff considering that the government spent a total of about $2 billion to help get people ready for the transition. The Bush administration spent about $1.5 billion on DTV transition preparation, and Congress allocated another $650 million when it delayed the transition in February.

The move to digital TV has also proved to be a big boon for retailers, TV makers, and other consumer electronics makers. Millions of consumers have bought digital TVs, converter boxes, and antennas to prepare for the switch. The Consumer Electronics Association says that TV sales are up about 32 percent in 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, and this is despite the fact that the U.S. is in a recession. But some experts attribute the uptick in new digital TV sales to lower prices and more digital programming.

Even though buying a new TV, an antenna, or a digital converter box for an older TV is a hassle and an expense, consumers also benefit from the transition to digital TV. These signals provide better picture quality. And because digital consumes less wireless spectrum when it transmits, broadcasters can offer viewers several more channels of programming. Many stations throughout the country that have already been broadcasting some or all of their signals in digital have already added channels.

The FCC has also been emphasizing to consumers that if they're already subscribed to a paid TV service, they will not have to worry about the transition at all. The DTV transition applies only to full-power broadcast television stations. These are stations that use the public airwaves to transmit their programming to viewers through a broadcast antenna. That said, satellite customers who receive local stations through an antenna, rather than by satellite, may be affected. The FCC recommends checking with the provider.

"Analog nightlight" services
So in short, the vast majority of Americans are already prepared for the digital TV transition. But for the small percentage of people who are still unready, all hope is not lost.

About a hundred TV stations around the country serving nearly 70 percent of all households are providing "analog nightlight" services. The "nightlight" program is a voluntary program in which TV stations agree to keep an analog signal turned on in addition to their digital signals to provide information about the DTV transition and to notify unprepared TV viewers of emergencies, such as hurricanes. More than half the stations broadcasting the "analog nightlight" service will remain on air for 30 days. And the rest will be on for at least two weeks. In total, these stations will reach 69 percent of TV households.

And only high-power broadcasters are required to switch to digital, a few low-power analog stations and rural relay stations known as "translators" will still be available in some areas.

The FCC and the Commerce Department also won't leave DTV laggards in the lurch after the June 12 deadline. Converter box coupons will still be available, while supplies last, until July 31. But consumers must keep in mind that the coupons expire 90 days after they are mailed, so they are urged to act quickly to redeem them. The FCC also recommends calling retailers ahead to confirm availability of coupon-eligible converter boxes on the day people go shopping.

And if you're still confused and frustrated and you don' t know what to do, the FCC is also planning to provide assistance to TV viewers after June 12. In some areas the FCC will continue to offer free in-home installation services and walk-in centers to consumers who need technical assistance. These programs will be available until the end of June, and in some locations, through July. And the FCC will keep its call center available to consumers at least through the end of July for anyone who has questions.

If you still need help upgrading your TV or you have questions about the availability of digital signals in your area, go to www.dtv.gov or call the government hot line on the transition at 1-888-CALLFCC ( 1-888-225-5322). You can also check out CNET's updated FAQ on the DTV transition for help.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Wireless
Initial Motorola Droid sales look good
Sprint to cut 2,000 to 2,500 jobs
Report: Clearwire gets more cash from investors
Nokia recalls 14 million chargers
New Verizon ad calls iPhone 'misfit toy'
Apple said to be working on 'world mode' iPhone
Is Verizon's new early-termination fee anti-consumer?
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (70 Comments)
by eBob1 June 11, 2009 4:40 AM PDT
Hopefully, this will bring about an end to those PSAs. It is really silly to broadcast those on the digital stations anyway. If you are watching the digital broadcast, then you have prepared for the transition, haven't you? Why then is it so necessary to bother these people with these advertisements?
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 June 11, 2009 10:51 AM PDT
I don't think they have a choice. The digital signal on the -001 is the same one that is still broadcast analog.
by superman227 June 11, 2009 4:49 AM PDT
If you were able to read this subject line, you're ready. You don't have internet if you have only 7 working channels.
Reply to this comment
by thelemurking June 11, 2009 5:55 AM PDT
My thoughts exactly... if you are reading this, then you most likely are ready.
by rdupuy11 June 11, 2009 9:06 AM PDT
Did you not read the article, superman? Some people have a digital television but still haven't hooked up some of their spare telelvisiions...frankly this dwarfs the problem of people who are completely unready.

Oh the horror of all those spare televisions lost, I cannot bear to think about it, I need to go lie down.
by brianhollings June 11, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
You are totally wrong. I have not had cable since I was five years old. I am now 17. We don't have cable because we believe most of it is just worthless. I have all the major channels (abc, cbs, nbc, pbs, the cw, fox, my tvz, ion) without a bill for something way overpriced. My family is not even close to being poor, we just find that we can live with only 8 channels. Cutting cable is a great way to save money.

Oh. wait. I have internet too? Just because people don't pay for hundreds of worthless junk doesn't make them low income.
by madeinttown June 11, 2009 2:15 PM PDT
Like brianhollings, I do not have cable TV.

I do have a gaming PC with internet though. I also have a large screen TV, but that is for my PS3 and Wii.

But since I don't watch TV (the same reason I have internet and no cable), I am not "prepared" for the DTV switch. But even if I was, it wouldn't matter since I don't watch the over the air channels.
by jefflac June 11, 2009 2:17 PM PDT
brianhollings,

You're a perfect case. You get your signal OTA and yet you're READY for the switch - because you read the headline and you know what you're talking about, you're already ready. That's the point! The people who aren't ready may have Internet access, but they certainly aren't spending their days reading CNET.
by notovny June 11, 2009 5:13 AM PDT
Untrue. For me (and I suspect, for a lot of posters here) if it was a choice between losing broadband internet service and dropping cable/satellite/pay tv service, the choice would be to keep broadband, And cable's not the only way to go for high-speed internet. Or even dialup, if you must.

On the other hand, I suspect the typical person who'd read this article on CNET was probably ready on February 17.
Reply to this comment
by manualfunky June 11, 2009 5:23 AM PDT
americans... make everything seem so darn difficult... i cant wait for the headlines tomorrow here in the southern hemisphere about americans whinging and moaning because they didnt know it was happening, it'll probably even get an airing on either "today, tonight" or "A current Affair" (the two worst tabloid programs in Oz) heck i'm sure the Chaser boys will have a field day with this one too, just like they did when they drove a fake motorcade through the APEC security in sydney a wee while back...
Reply to this comment
by thelemurking June 11, 2009 5:58 AM PDT
Well ya know, Obama didn't want to be the president who took away the free TV from the little old white ladies so we got the extension.

It's sad really, that 4-6% of the population has caused this much havoc... and out of that 4-6%, there's no way to tell how many of them even watch TV, or even have a TV.
by BCF1968 June 11, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
to thelemurking

Yes blame Obama. The coupon program was signed into law by BUSH. The digital transition law was passed by a republican controlled Congress and signed into law by Clinton in 1996. So how is Obama to blame for anything?
by rickhigginshtbr June 11, 2009 1:42 PM PDT
BCF, because most people don't know it was passed that long ago, that's how some people will blame Obama...
by ecartman0 June 11, 2009 5:41 AM PDT
I live out in the sticks and I know of NO ONE who has rabbit ears for TV. What a waste of money for these ads. Speaking of money what happened to the billions the government made on this deal? Public airwaves were sold so where is my check?
Reply to this comment
by man_w_balls June 11, 2009 7:28 AM PDT
they wasted it all on the stupid PSAs and the $40 coupons
by thelemurking June 11, 2009 8:30 AM PDT
haven't you heard, your check was used to help bail out companies that made bad financial decisions. some bank CEO vacationing on his $8 million dollar yacht thanks you for your cooperation and understanding.
by BCF1968 June 11, 2009 11:17 AM PDT
"they wasted it all on the stupid PSAs and the $40 coupons "

Actually less than $2 billion of the $20 billion the government made was used on the converter box coupon program and PSAs. So please get your facts straight before psoting stupid stuff.
by martin_c_e June 11, 2009 6:13 PM PDT
Public airwaves were NOT sold for the transition of DTV. There is no check.
by martin_c_e June 11, 2009 6:39 PM PDT
Public airwaves that were for tv were sold for wireless phone/data service, not for use as tv.
by JoeKoskovics June 11, 2009 5:58 AM PDT
I haven't watched regular television in several years. The quality of programming is, shall we say... not high quality. So when analog goes dark, it will be no big deal.

Thankfully, I can VOD whatever I need on the Internet, and ignore the low quality stuff too. (Legally)
Podcasts are great, if you know where to look.
Streaming radio is Okay, if you avoid the cookie cutter stations.
Weather radios are still available too.
It's just another change in the surroundings... that's all. People will adapt. So those who need it will migrate, those who don't care will use alternatives.
Reply to this comment
by martin_c_e June 11, 2009 6:16 PM PDT
Basically, you are just saying that you are a snob. Most people watch some broadcast channels normally because most local news is broadcast and there is quite a bit of quality programming on broadcast.
by rootofjesse June 11, 2009 6:14 AM PDT
"But it may also be due to the fact that digital signals travel differently through the air than analog signals." - Ack! No, no, no.. I might expect a statement like that from my local newspaper, but not CNET. Digital broadcasts propagate in the same way that analog broadcasts do. The FCC has no control over the properties of electromagnetic radiation. However, the requirements for acceptable reception of those digital signals are different than analog.
Reply to this comment
by Been_there_Saw_it_before June 11, 2009 12:53 PM PDT
" But it may also be due to the fact that digital signals travel differently through the air than analog signals. So some TV viewers who may have been able to tune in analog channels may not be able to receive digital channels." Well, CNET just struck out, three batters in a row, and now it is my turn at bat.

Radio Frequency Signals being broadcast through the air do not introduce themselves to the Air and say, "Hello, I'm Mr. Digital, treat me differently."

Someone at CNET needs to enforce journalistic accuracy and do some proofreading by a technically competent proofreader. One of my favorite quotes is that "All digital circuits (and signals too) have a little analog circuit (and signal too) hidden underneath just waiting to get out. All radio and TV signals are analog, the only thing that makes them digital is the rise and fall time of the modulation and how the signal is proccessed. Digital signals are subject to the same rules that plague analog signals. The issues that were discovered, described, and delt with a hundred years ago are still the same: power, noise, bandwidth, propagation path, transmitter and receiver characteristics, circuit design, and technology. The only thing that is better now is the technology for dealing with all the other issues. Digital broadcasting is only better because you only need to send the information "once" and not include so much "duplication and redundancy" and the associated bandwidth that requires. Go back and read about the history of radio if you do not understand this posting
by JWreford June 11, 2009 6:15 AM PDT
Why do they make it seem like it is the end of the world if a person does not have TV.

TV is a luxury not a necessity. There are so many other was of accumulating knowledge (Global issues, local issues, etc) other than TV. Newspaper, magazines, internet, and old fashioned conversation.

It is only an issue to the advertising companies, and any other company that wants to see you something or bombard you with product identity.

Some people don't react until it is too late. Procrastinators. Since when does the government need to hand hold grown adults. So much for sink or swim. We should encourage people to learn and grow and help themselves.

You can survive just fine without TV.
Reply to this comment
by subslug June 11, 2009 7:49 AM PDT
I agree with you. But check this out...
I just made a random joke about being "digital ready" at a party we were at a week or so ago.
A younger female, 25ish actually said, "what's digital ready mean" lol...I thought she was kidding. Turns out after some conversations that she hasn't actually watched any sort of news cast in more than two years.
She's an MTV only person.
I realize most of the time the news is a downer but my gosh, how is this even possible? She reads no news papers, watches no news other than what MTV squirts out it's nasty regions, it's scary to think of this. I pray that she isn't any representation of 25ish people in our world now.

I think DTV is but the tip of the iceberg as far as humanity's problems go.
by gefitz June 11, 2009 9:23 AM PDT
The reason the delay occurred was for national security/disaster preparedness reasons, gang. The fact is that (especially for the least technology-savvy in our country; in other words, the very people that didn't switch in time) television is the main source of information for these folks--and the backup is radio, not the other way around.

I think if the Gov't would have framed it this way, these folks might have jumped and done something. So, delaying the deadline was only a symptom of the problem: if the Gov't would have made a better case by framing it in such a way that made it important, more people would have been ready a long time ago.
by CaptAdventure June 11, 2009 6:47 AM PDT
For help with the DTV transition (and a laugh) see below:

http://www.hulu.com/watch/36608/talkshow-with-spike-feresten-cable-psa
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids June 11, 2009 9:55 PM PDT
Yeah, I've seen that before! Hilarious! :)
by darfjono June 11, 2009 7:56 AM PDT
if you're not ready by now you don't deserve TV. let them be in the dark. stop holding up the nation and annoying the rest of us with those ads for such a small amount of people.
Reply to this comment
by BtmnHatesRbn June 11, 2009 8:31 AM PDT
Robert X. Cringely has the real numbers on who's not ready. And it's more like 99% of the TV audience out there. You'll see. CNET, who is owned by CBS Viacom (and it's 31 flavors and corrupt "breaking-up" of itself which is baloney) will not report the truth, since CBS is the primary breadwinner for the corporation.
Reply to this comment
by gefitz June 11, 2009 9:19 AM PDT
"So here we are, less than a day away from the final transition. And despite months of public service announcements and more than $2 billion spent by the U.S. government to help people prepare, millions will still face a blank screen when they hit that little power button on their TV remotes starting Friday at 12:01 a.m."

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
Reply to this comment
by rdupuy11 June 11, 2009 9:21 AM PDT
TV owners get $40 from the government, if they will use it to make an old analog tv work, theoretically paid from the auction of the publicly owned digital spectrum.

OK, but whats public, is public.

If you don't need this box, you get nothing (whether you don't need it because you have satellite/cable service, don't own a tv at all, or all your tv's have digital tuners built in).

Frankly thats non-sensical, to favor part of the public, but leave out part of the public, but the people who thought this up, have no particular values that guide them, they just wanted a digital-analog converter program.

But what was in the best public interest? Give everybody a check, and let them spend it on anything they want. Some people own no tv, and guess what, thats fine. Some people have tv's and don't need a converter box, whether they use satellite tv, cable, or have a digital tuner already, and thats fine too.

The goal here, seems to be encourage the extension of the life of analog tv's.

It's not for the poor, or they would have limited to the poor. And its not for the general public, or everyone would have gotten a check.

The goal here is not the public, but the analog tv's themselves...sparing them from an untimely early demise.
Reply to this comment
by gefitz June 11, 2009 9:28 AM PDT
Again: I'd agree with rdupuy11 if it weren't for the fact that the reason they offered any rebate at all was to be sure the majority of americans would be prepared to continue having access to the Emergency Broadcast System. Yeah yeah, radio. But the idea is to always have two major sources of information in the case of natural disaster or emergency.
by BCF1968 June 11, 2009 11:28 AM PDT
Um you get the benefit that your first responders now have the extra frequencies to use in case of an emergency situation. You get the benefit the government has an extra $18 to pay for things instead of having to raise your taxes to get it. And there are other benefits that will be realized.
by rdupuy11 June 11, 2009 12:08 PM PDT
@gefitz,

I don't see how you responded to what i said. Say EBS is a worthy goal. Then why wasn't the coupon allowed for people who own no TV at all, to purchase their first TV, so they could also get the EBS signal....they were left out of there share of these digital spectrum proceeds...new tv's are digital, and don't need the converter. Even if you did own an old analog set, why wouldn't replacing your TV, with one that has a digital tuner, be a valid way of continuing EBS service into your home?

Face it, this program was some kind of analog tv set conservation program, and not an EBS program...if it was an EBS program a different form would have taken place.
by Maggie Reardon June 11, 2009 12:34 PM PDT
You made some interesting points here. Thanks for posting! You might want to check out the video that my colleague Erik Palm did about following the last days of an analog TV to the recycling center. Maybe it's not such a bad thing to keep the old analog TV alive. If it's still working fine, there shouldn't be any reason to trash it and have it end up in a landfill in China or Africa where people burn the TVs to get to the internal components like the copper wiring. Apparently burning this stuff releases all kinds of toxic chemicals. The video is linked within my story. Anyway, thanks for your comments and for reading CNET News.
by 4score20 June 11, 2009 9:33 AM PDT
I volunteer with an organization which brings meals to shut-ins and other homebound folks and let me tell you, most of these people are not DTV-ready. Their only entertainment is TV and on the 12th they will be cut off. In the moments I have to deliver their food and help them to their tables so they can eat I've quickly explained the impending changes and although I've assumed I've gotten through to them they have not gotten the necessary equipment. I've given them the numbers to call when their screens go black tomorrow and I feel bad but I can't do anything else for them.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 June 11, 2009 10:58 AM PDT
What did you expect? These people are accustomed to having things done for them like have their food delivered, being helped to the table and I bet that's not all. The line has to be drawn somewhere.
by 4score20 June 11, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
Yeah. Never really been good at drawing a line though; I worry I'll leave my humanity on the other side of it.
by rdupuy11 June 11, 2009 12:12 PM PDT
@4score20

probably what you should do, is not give them numbers to call, but instead call the numbers yourself, and get the coupons ordered. After that you'll probably need another $10 per person, to cover the difference, coupon vs. cost of the device. Finally, hook it up for them.

And you may cry the entire time, but you'll feel better when you are done.
by Maggie Reardon June 11, 2009 12:38 PM PDT
4score20, if you would like to help these folks, please check out the FCC's DTV website. They offer programs where people can get digital tuners for the cost of the $40 voucher and they will have volunteers available to help hook up the tuners. But you must act quickly these programs won't last forever. At the most they will be around until July 31 of this year. Good luck and thanks for commenting and reading CNET News!
by 4score20 June 11, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
My thanks to you, Maggie! I had no idea there were volunteers working to install these units. Awesome. I'm off to the FCC's site. Again, thanks.
by JimBrittTN June 11, 2009 3:12 PM PDT
How difficult is it to hook up a couple of wires! If people can't hook up this box I'm surprised they can use a remote!
by waynerifish June 11, 2009 10:06 AM PDT
Does anyone else find the photograph that has been accompanying these DTV articles is a little misleading? It shows one TV with a very snowy analog picture beside another with a crystal clear (presumably digital) picture. In my own experience, if that snowy picture is the best you can get an analog station to come in, the digital signal you get will be unwatchable. At least the snowy analog picture is watchable; when you start to lose digital signals, watchability degrades very quickly.
Reply to this comment
by rootofjesse June 11, 2009 10:25 AM PDT
I would say that picture is realistic. I get some analog channels that look like that but I can get the digital signal reliably most of the time.
by BCF1968 June 11, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
The picture is realistic, I get a clear digital picture on some channels that barely come in at all on analog. Certainly MUCH worse that that pic. I'm lucky if I get 2 chanels that come in even that clear on analog.
by martin_c_e June 11, 2009 6:30 PM PDT
The pictures are accurate. Because the analog and digital signals are on different channels today and antenna placement will probably favor one or the other depending on how they are set. That said, tomorrow, some of those digital channels that were on UHF will be back on VHF and not only will the tv need to be re-scanned, the antenna may have to be adjusted again. If you have trouble on analog vhf, you may have flaky digital tomorrow.
by Batotahell June 11, 2009 10:51 AM PDT
My only problem with the DTV conversion is how it will affect everyone on the Gulf Coast. For years we've had our little hurricane TVs in preparation for storm season. Now those TVs are no good because of this. When you are watching a 5-7" battery-operated TV screen to find out when the power will be restored or what is happening in your area the last thing you will think is "Look how good that digital picture is." Except now you won't get that picture on an old TV because if the power is out the DTV converter is too.
Reply to this comment
by 4score20 June 11, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
Looks like a battery-powered transistor radio might be the solution there. We relied on one during the 2004 summer blackout here on the east coast. Glad we had it.
by BCF1968 June 11, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
All the battery operated TVs made since March 2007 have built in digital tuners. If you are that concerned I'm sure you'll spend the $100 it takes to get a new one.
by BCF1968 June 11, 2009 11:19 AM PDT
This more of a beginning not an ending. I see MORE people using antennas again not less. Why pay your cable or satellite company for HD locals when you can get them for free? People who just have basic cable can now dump that and get the same if not better quality picture.
Reply to this comment
by miniwas June 11, 2009 11:21 AM PDT
I have been ready, only problem the stations here aren't ready. CBS is analog only for the last couple months, ABC drifts in and out, signal keeps dropping and NBC is ok most of the time. FOX is reliable and the one indepentdent that has switched. So tomorrow I'll see if they are really broadcasting in digital. Ah
Reply to this comment
by gary85739 June 11, 2009 12:08 PM PDT
Wonder how long it will be, before viewers realize that DTV is NOT HDTV?
Reply to this comment
by rootofjesse June 11, 2009 12:45 PM PDT
What do you mean? Some DTV is HDTV, but not all broadcasts are DTV. A person with a government sponsored converter box can watch an HDTV broadcast but will not see the full resolution. But a person with an HDTV with tuner can watch free over-the-air HDTV.
by rootofjesse June 11, 2009 12:50 PM PDT
Oops, I meant to say not all broadcasts are HDTV.
by Renegade Knight June 11, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
My cable company was ready. They upped the price of basic cable.
Reply to this comment
by tppickles June 11, 2009 4:28 PM PDT
Really? the cable company im working for is offering basic cable for 9.95 for a year and then around 20.99 after that, its only 20 channels but its great for people who only need their tvs for emergencies or to check the news and weather every once in a while. Myself I have Rogers cable in Canada for the next bit then no cable at all, my tv will be for watching movies off the net and playing xbox360 and thats about it
Showing 1 of 2 pages (70 Comments)
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right