• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
May 4, 2009 7:22 AM PDT

Sprint blames economy for Q1 customer losses

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 36 comments

Update 7:22 a.m. PDT: This story was updated with comments and information from the company's conference call.

Sprint Nextel is blaming the economy for a steep decline in subscribers, though its prepaid and wholesale businesses are seen as important growth areas as the company faces stiff competition.

Meanwhile, financial losses mounted in Sprint's first-quarter earnings released Monday.

"We are happy about the success of Boost Unlimited (prepaid, no-contract service) and our wholesale business," Dan Hesse, Sprint's CEO said during a conference call with analysts and investors on Monday. "But the economy has created some challenges."

Sprint reported a loss of $594 million or 21 cents per share, for the three months that ended March 31, a decline of 18 cents per share from the same quarter a year ago. Revenue was also down about 12 percent to $8.21 billion. Analysts had expected about $8.28 billion in revenue.

The company lost a total of about 182,000 wireless customers during the quarter to end with a total of 49.1 million.

Meanwhile, competitors AT&T and Verizon Wireless each added customers for the quarter. AT&T added 1.2 million new wireless subscribers and Verizon Wireless added 1.3 million.

Contract customers are considered valuable because they typically spend more on their service per month. And because of the contracts, they don't cancel service as often as customers without contracts.

Sprint has been losing contract customers for several quarters due, in part, to poor customer service and increased competition from AT&T and Verizon. But Hesse said on the conference call that the heavy losses were business subscribers--not consumers.

He said that layoffs and corporate downsizing over the past few months have led many businesses to reduce the number of BlackBerry devices and other phones used by employees. This was especially true in manufacturing and construction, which are big subscribers to Sprint's push-to-talk service on Nextel's iDEN network. Hesse said that Sprint relies more heavily on business subscribers than its competitors do and, as a result, has been affected more by these layoffs than its rivals. That said, Hesse believes that when the economy turns around, business subscribers will come back.

The loss of these business customers contributed to an increased churn rate. Churn for the quarter, or the rate at which customers cancel service, was 2.25 percent in the first quarter. This was up from 2.16 percent in the fourth quarter, but down from 2.45 percent a year ago.

On a positive note, Hesse said that Sprint's Simply Everything plan, which was launched last year and offers unlimited voice, texting, e-mailing, and Web surfing for $99 a month, has helped increase monthly spending for individual subscribers.

"Now if you look at our churn characteristics, it's inversely related to the lowest churn among the highest ARPU (average revenue per user) customers," he said. "And the highest churn is among the least valuable customers. So churn is actually better than it looks."

The biggest success story of the company's quarter came from the launch of its Boost Unlimited. This service, which offers unlimited voice and messaging service for a flat rate of $50 a month with no contract, operates on Sprint's iDEN network, launched in late January and has been deemed a big success so far.

"There is no question that there is a movement toward prepaid," Hesse said. "And we currently have some strong offers out there."

Hesse said he believes that the prepaid market will actually help expand the entire wireless market.

"Some of these prepaid customers are people using cell phones for the first time," he said. "So I think overall, as an industry, we will see more revenue growth than we would have seen without prepaid services."

Sprint also saw some uptick in subscriber growth on its wholesale network with 394,000 new customers. And Hesse said that growth in wholesale is a big opportunity and that he sees more growth coming from devices, such as Amazon.com's Kindle e-book reader.

Beyond products and services, Sprint also did a fairly good job cutting costs. While some of the losses in the first quarter were one-time charges associated with its staff reductions, Hesse said that the cuts will help the company generate more cash to help it pay down its debt obligations.

Hesse didn't comment directly on a report from The Wall Street Journal that said the company is planning to outsource its network operations to telecommunications equipment maker Ericsson. But he said the company is focused on generating cash and would consider "alternatives that makes a lot of sense for the company."

Looking forward, Hesse said he expects to see more growth from the Boost Unlimited servoce. And he said the company has a strong lineup of new handsets for its subscribers with contracts. The handsets include the Palm Pre, which is due out this summer. Beyond that, he said, Sprint is expecting to see some growth from 4G subscribers on the Clearwire network who will want dual-mode devices that switch between 3G and 4G services. Clearwire is expected to have 10 markets up and running with the new 4G WiMax service by year's end.

"Most of the major initiatives in the postpaid market are geared to have a major impact in second half of the year," Hesse said, referring to customers with contracts. "With the Boost Unlimited (prepaid) service, it's still too early to tell. We see no evidence (that this was due to a big grand opening). Our goal is to have similar net additions and growth for Boost Unlimited in the second quarter as we had in the first quarter."

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Wireless
Windows Mobile loses nearly a third of market share
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
AT&T: Verizon ads are 'blatantly false'
HTC expects rough fourth quarter
Dell unveils Android-based Mini 3 smartphone
Qualcomm readies 3G/4G mobile chipsets
Report: Motorola looks to sell set-top box biz
Powering cell phone towers with wind
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (36 Comments)
by mjconver May 4, 2009 5:47 AM PDT
And their losses will continue to mount. My company can't wait until our Sprint contract runs out this summer and we can switch to Verizon. Sprint's service is below average, and and their phones have brain dead software. We stopped using the walkie-talkie feature years ago, it's a gimmick only useful for people like job-site construction workers, not white collar offices.
Reply to this comment
by Eddie-c May 4, 2009 8:43 AM PDT
Actually, PTT is extremely beneficial for faciilities depts and those who are part of the ERT trained people in any company. It is FAR from a gimmick.
by gsekse May 4, 2009 6:10 AM PDT
Yep! I have used Verizon for years, my phone works 99.9% of the time and call drops are rare. A co-worker had a sprint phone. We were sitting at a light, she cussed when her phone wouldn't work. I pulled out mine and handed to her, "try mine", she made her call and said, "I can't wait for this *uc*ing Sprint contract to run out!"

Even the Nextel lovers are starting to give up on them.
Reply to this comment
by cb3431 May 4, 2009 6:21 AM PDT
I made the mistake of switching to Sprint two months back and today I welcome my new Verizon phone. Sprint had no problem releasing the contract because 90% of the calls I made were to their technical support number because their service does not work. Sprint's service does not even work when it's Sprint to Sprint.
Reply to this comment
by magellan777 May 4, 2009 7:06 AM PDT
I have been with Sprint for over 10 years now and have grown more and more unhappy with them and their service. I cant make calls from inside my home because there is no signal. I have also recently started to only get roaming zones all over the Dallas/FT Worth area. With a major city this large, you'd think that they would place a reliable network there.

The only reason that i have stayed is for the security of the one phone # that I have had for almost 15 years. (long story) Now that AT&T is willing to move my number over to their network - ie finally getting my iphone - I am just waiting for the contract to run out.

Hey Sprint - can you hear your customers now? - we're leaving.
Reply to this comment
by sharmajunior May 4, 2009 7:09 AM PDT
Who da haell invests in Sprint? Such a worthless company that somehow manages to get advertising into 24. "Oh look, 3G downloads from my phone". Just plain BS.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight May 4, 2009 7:10 AM PDT
Looks like Sprint's going to die a miserable death if they don't offer up something people want to use. Both a plan and service to back it up. There is room. Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile all still jack customers on plans and pricing.
Reply to this comment
by bj1126 May 4, 2009 7:48 AM PDT
I don't understand the complaints about Sprint customer service. It is on par with every other company and their Blackberry support is exceptional.

The real problem I see Sprint facing is their complete lack of phones. They are losing customers left and right because all of the best new phones are coming out on other networks.
Reply to this comment
by c4s2k3 May 4, 2009 7:57 AM PDT
I was with Sprint for 8 years and finally dropped them when the original iPhone became available. My 2 biggest issues with Sprint at the time were:
1) They were WAAAAAY behind the curve on technology. Took them forever to have a single phone capable of Bluetooth (Sony-Ericsson T608) when other carriers had multiple Bluetooth-capable phones.
2) Most of the phones they pushed were Samsung and they simply did not perform very well on Sprint's network. Before I get flamed by any Samsung fanboys out there, I cannot comment on how Samsung phones perform these days but back then, Samsung on Sprint was synonymous with low battery life and lots of dropped calls. Both situations were significantly better when I used a Sanyo or Sony-Ericsson phone on the same Sprint network.

Word of mouth is a double edged sword. Sprint went for a long time without putting customer's needs (like call reliability and technology convenience features) first, and they are paying the price.
Reply to this comment
by faceless128 May 4, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
the only reason i stick with sprint is because i have the SERO plan. $30 for 500 minutes and unlimited text, sprint to sprint and data. i'll keep that plan until they go out of business.
Reply to this comment
by May 4, 2009 8:49 AM PDT
I had a contract with Nextel since circa 2000 and they dropped me and sent a bill for some $300 dollars for loss of my contract.

I had lost their phone and went to one of the Nextel / Sprint affiliates to get another. They told me that if I paid for a new one and didn't get the extension then I would have no trouble. Apparently these affiliates make their money on commissions for writing up new two year contracts because I was hoodwinked into signing another when I thought all I was doing was keeping me phone number from my account. I had always paid in advance and had a credit, but never got a bill. Somehow I got a huge bill but didn't get any accounting for it. I am so pi**ed right now I could bite railroad spikes in half.
DW
Reply to this comment
by Eddie-c May 4, 2009 8:53 AM PDT
Hesse talks out of his posterior - or is simply trying to delude both himself and any shareholders/board-members etc that have a low iq - by trying to blame the exodus of customers to other carriers on the economy. They have lost millions, both in revenue and customers, over at least 7 quarters - we have not been in a recession that long!!

For Sprint, imho, they bought NexTel to try to not be the smallest carrier in the US. They knew NexTels' iDen was not compatible and anyone (in Sprint) who thought they'd be able to get NexTel users to change were, simply, idiots. The biggest 'win' for Sprint was, of course, that Nascar now has "Sprint" cups instead of "NexTel".

I've read rumours, on tech sites, about T-Mobile, Comcast and some of the original NexTel people being interested in trying to get NexTel back - NexTel works, is viable and their base appreciate an organisation that (a) knows what it is doing and (b) doesn't suck, unlike Sprint ... from both a corporate & non-corporate perspective.

One of the only things going for Sprint, imo, is that they will bend over backwards to get corporate business ... coming up with extremely deep discounts that no other carriers will match but, as the saying goes, you get what you pay for ... and with Sprint, their back-end systems are poor, customer service is lacking and so is coverage.

Sprint is akin to GoodLink - still playing catch-up while wanting to be 'great'. They have a very long way to go.
Reply to this comment
by JerryRiggg May 4, 2009 9:38 AM PDT
I can never wait to weigh in when it comes to mobile carriers. Yes, Sprint bought an incompatibale network. What were they thinking?. Oh yeah, trying to get to number two or number one; didn't happen and won't happen. We can debate all day long on whose calls drop the most. I switched from AT&T to Sprint years ago because of too many dropped calls. It wasn't unusual for my now ex-girlfriend to ask me to use my Sprint phone because she experienced so many dropped calls with AT&T. The bottom line is none of them are perfect no matter how much propoganda bulls..t they pust down our throats. People you have to do your homework and research, then decide on the carrier thats best for you. I for instance stick with Sprint because they're the only carrier that works in my hometown which I visit frequently. Thats whats important to me. I do wish they had a better selection of handsets though, I've long maintained Samsung had a quality control problem but then again quality control is a problem industry wide. Why else are there so many reconditioned phones on the market which they gladly push off on us when our purchased brand new handset goes bad. Yes, that insurance scam is the biggest line of bs they all have going for themselves. Sprint happens to work fine for me and being around people with other carriers I'm not convinced the problems I do have will go away just because I've switched carriers. On top of that Verizon and AT&T's plan pricing are rediculous. I don't have Sprint's simply everything plan but I know it can't be beat. Because I have more than one phone on my plan I have a family plan and thats what works for me. I would like to own the Blackberry Storm because I need an international phone and if Sprint built it the way they built the Blackberry 8830 with unlocked GSM that would be perfect for my travels to Europe. So go forth all of you and prosper. Make intelligent decisions. Remember Verizon and AT&T are destined to continue their battle for the number one and two spots; Sprint will never catch them now. Check into those new unlimited prepaid plans, I think they've got something there and for a fraction of the cost. Metropcs is up and coming, I would probably choose Virgin myself because they use Sprint's network but I won't choose Boost (Sprint) because I don't care for the iden (Sprint/Nextel) network.
Reply to this comment
by Eddie-c May 4, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
Jerry - just make sure you check Sprints' web-site for coverage then ... AND the frequencies ...
e.g. the Samsung Ace, touted as a world-phone has GSM 900 & 1800MHz however some South American countries use the same GSM frequencies the US uses - 850/1900MHz so the device is worthless there. Also that device is touted that it will work in Japan ... Japan went their own way with UMTS and WCDMA. They are now, slowly (for some reason) deploying limited CDMA - a step backwards - and the coverage is so poor it's not worth it. Check the specs of the device and coverage maps - and take the maps with a little pinch of salt.
by i_am_still_wade May 4, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
Yeah, un-huh. The economy, that must be it. [end sarcasm]

I see Sprint ads talking about 4G and I wonder why they are even trying to have 4G when they cannot do 1G right. If the foundation is weak, the whole house will be weak. Sprint is bleeding customers because of lousy service and lousy support. I have a friend with a Nextel and every time I call, be it weekdays or weekends early or late, it always goes straight to voicemail. Is he using the phone? No. Is he in a dead zone? No. It is Sprint.

I had Nextel. When Sprint bought Nextel I told them the reason I was canceling was because of Sprint. I went back to AT&T, which was Cingular, which was BellSouth. Where I live, BellSouth was the first digital service and it was GSM. Thus where I live, AT&T is as good as Verizon. And the prices are a lot better than nickel-and-dime phone-crippling Verizon too. Every carrier has good and bad coverage areas, except Sprint. Sprint only has bad areas.
Reply to this comment
by datum226 May 4, 2009 10:10 AM PDT
I have no idea why people complain about Sprint. I live in Orlando, FL and I never had any better service than Sprint. Never had a dropped call. I do a lot of tethering and speeds better than Verizon, and way better that AT&T. Choices of phones are not so good, so I am very excited about Pre.
Reply to this comment
by Eddie-c May 4, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
datum - there are areas where 1 carrier is better than others ... e.g. verizon, hands-down, for the eastern seaboard - Ma, Va, NY etc; Wa, Northern Calif = ATT. (At least from my few years in corporate mobile support)
by rnaoncfixd May 4, 2009 12:01 PM PDT
I couldn't agree more. I switched to Sprint from T-Mobile and couldn't be happier. I see people with Verizon phones and the interface is horrible every time I play with one. I don't like the AT&T network coverage in my area and it tends to be a little weak in areas (though not as weak as T-Mobile).

When I got to Sprint, I did it as a family plan with my sister. We got unlimited data, 1500 minutes, 3G access, and 2 free blackberry curves on a 2 year contract. I've been super happy with the service and network coverage so far. The only dead spot I really ran into was the state of Delaware. Everywhere else works great; in my office building, I'm the only one that can get coverage while everyone else has to use the land line phones.

When people hate on Sprint coverage and service, I have to disagree because while I've been with them for 5 months, I've yet to have a dropped call and had great coverage over the Maryland, DC, Virginia area. When a train was delayed in a tunnel on the DC Metro system, I was one of the few in my group of friends that was able to contact another group and tell them that we were late.

The losses in Sprint is a real shame because I haven't experienced any of the difficulties that others have had.
by ofmyony May 4, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
Sprint made me pay a one cent bill one month after terminating my contract. This is after I told the CSR the month before to make sure I am paid in full, because I didn't want any more bills coming to my home. The next month I got another bill, of course the one cent bill. I called the CSR and said are you really going to make me pay a one cent bill! She said if you want the bills to stop you have to pay the one cent charge. They wanted me to pay over the phone but I couldn't pass up the chance to show them some love in the store. Lets just say I got some attention.

Sprint has the worst customer service, a mean and hateful company, and I live near their headquarters. Take your business somewhere else, that is my pennies worth.
Reply to this comment
by seb33sf May 4, 2009 2:43 PM PDT
It's more than your pennies worth - have you seen the MSN Customer Service Hall of Shame?

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SmartSpending/ConsumerActionGuide/TheCustomerServiceHallOfShame.aspx

Wonder if Sprint will make the 2009 list. The black and white ads where Dan Hesse talks about simple, all-inclusive plans is clearly intended to communicate that the mess is behind them. New CEO, new monthly plans, everything is good now, so please ignore that army of unhappy former customers....

Time will tell whether they have improved. Sprint had major issues with billing errors (due to problems integrating disparate systems) and renewal of contracts without customer consent (due to incentivizing service reps to renew contracts, which led to the less-ethical reps simply renewing any customer who called in for support).

I was personally overcharged and lied to by their reps. Since Sprint has never made any effort to make amends (despite being aware of the problems), I will always regard them as a fundamentally dishonest company, and will continue to encourage people to avoid them.

Since leaving Sprint I have been quite happy with both T-Mobile and Verizon (only left T-Mobile to get on an employer plan with Verizon) and have consistently recommend both companies as alternatives to Sprint. Note that T-Mobile, far from being a Hall of Shame candidate, gets consistently high marks for their customer service. You can always find people to complain about any big company, but that does not mean they are all the same. Some are much better than others. Sprint is one of the worst, as independent sources like MSN will attest.
by btljooz May 4, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
I got fed up with Sprint long before they ever offered Cell Phone service! At the time they were only a Long Distance carrier for Land Lines. Even back then they were doing everything they could to pi$$ off their customers. So why is it that everyone is surprised at their complete lack of competency where Cell Phone service is concerned.

"The Economy" is simply a convenient EXCUSE for going under...and they ARE going under!!!...you just watch and see. I give 'em about three to five more years before they start crying for "government 'help'".
Reply to this comment
by TKE49 May 4, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
Regular people DO NOT complain about Sprint's Network and Voice - both are exceptional.

The fact is, Verizon is having people coming on here and bad mouth them. Don't listen.

http://www.mefeedia.com/entry/sprints-new-4g-speed-demon/12905545

Fact is, voice quality depends on your REGION. And Nationally, according to JD Powers, Sprint and Verizon BOTH have the top call quality. ATT and TMobile are behind.

When it comes to DATA NETWORK, Sprint's EVDO Can't be beat. Period.Sprint's 3G and soon-to-come 4G are blazing fast.

Do your research and stop listening to Sprint haters. There are plenty of professional tests done that are public - google it.
Reply to this comment
by i_am_still_wade May 4, 2009 2:06 PM PDT
Uh, wrong. Shall I give you the names of several regular people who hate Sprint? I don't care what JD Power says, I care what the real world says. And the real world says Sprint is the definition of incompetence. It is not about voice quality, it is about just making and receiving a call, period. What good is crystal clear calling if nobody can contact you? Furthermore, since CDMA is newer than GSM it is naturally going to have better voice quality.

What good is 3G and 4G to a phone? When I make a call, I can promise you I care nothing about whether I am using 1G or 2G or 3G or 4G or beyond. I just want to make a call and not drop my call. Speed is irrelevant for calling. If Sprint is betting on a data network to save their phone network, they are even stupider than I thought.

When Sprint bought Nextel, all the had to do was not mess it up, and they couldn't even do that. Even without switching from iDen to CDMA, Nextel service went in the toilet.

Shall I give you the names of those regular people? And no, I do not have Verizon. Never have, never will.
by mjconver May 4, 2009 3:45 PM PDT
Excuse me, I'm a regular person (I was the first to post at the top). I live in Virginia, and the rest of my family is on Verizon. I'm tired of them making fun of me when I have to walk outside when I'm home to carry on business calls, or when they can't understand what I'm saying when I'm driving home.

I'm not a Sprint hater, I'm a Sprint victim.
by Eddie-c May 4, 2009 3:50 PM PDT
TKE: Here are two perfect examples of how arcane Sprint is ... (1) you have to manually program a device for an ESN swap. Their CDMA/EVDO competitor is a simple *228 option 1. 3.5yrs after asking my Sprint account manager when they would have an OTA process they still don't have one. (2) When bluetooth was out, it took them over 6 months to come out with a bluetooth phone, while the other carriers were laughing at them.
by TKE49 May 4, 2009 4:03 PM PDT
Gimme a break - and you don't think there are people in DIFFERENT REGIONS who say the exact same thing about AT&T and Verizon?!

AT&T's network is horrendous in both voice and data - that's a fact. They live on the i-Phone sales and marketing - other than that, my mom, my sister and my dad all hate AT&T's service and think it's a crime they can even claim "more bars in more places"... Dropped calls - you wanna talk about dropped calls? We won't even go into AT&T's customer service - which is also horrendous.

Bottom line - there are people who hate their carrier depending on region. And different regions have different service quality.

My family is full of REGULAR PEOPLE too - and we can all say that AT&T has horrible service.

But you may have a different experience.
by TKE49 May 4, 2009 4:05 PM PDT
So bottom line - even as you may know some people with negative experiences at Sprint - I know just as many with positive experiences...And I also can give you lists of people not happy with AT&T or Verizon. So stop acting like Verizon and ATT are flawless.
by TKE49 May 5, 2009 8:56 AM PDT
Oh and let's not forget that Verizon and ATT are full of hype - like the fact they're claiming that they're going to have a 4G LTE platform sometime soon. I call shenanigans on that. LTE won't be out until 2011 at the earliest...
Long BEFORE THEN, Sprint will have a nationwide 4G WiMAX service. Sprint already has 4G in Baltimore TODAY - with another roll out coming soon. We're talking cable speeds.

So you tell me who's archaic? Don't believe all the hype you see.
by TV James May 4, 2009 1:43 PM PDT
I think Sprint misunderstands the definition of the word economy. I think the words they are looking for are persistent poor customer service, criminal billing practices, predatory contracts, obfuscation, crummy phone choices, etc., etc., etc.
Reply to this comment
by BamAlmighty May 4, 2009 2:12 PM PDT
I like my Sprint service, but I am not a fan of their plans.

If I ever lose my grandfathered SERO plan, I am gone.
Reply to this comment
by kinncreek May 4, 2009 2:18 PM PDT
As I told the last Sprint rep.I talked with, the happiest day of my life is when they go broke( aside from the people who loose their jobs). Their service is terrible and certainly not worth the price.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (36 Comments)
advertisement
Click Here

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right