• On The Insider: Tom Brady Knows Baby's Gender
April 22, 2009 9:18 AM PDT

AT&T: Blame the economy, not the iPhone

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 18 comments
Share

Updated at 9:18 a.m. PDT: Analysis added about AT&T's iPhone subsidy and its labor costs. Comments also added from the company's conference call.

AT&T is pinning the more than 9 percent dip in profits for the first quarter on the slumping economy and expenses related to its retirement plan--and not on hefty subsidies associated with the popular iPhone.

AT&T said Wednesday it earned $3.1 billion, or 53 cents per share, in the first quarter. This figure is down from $3.5 billion, or 57 cents per share, during the same quarter last year. Revenue fell about 0.6 percent to $30.6 billion.

Despite the loss, results actually exceeded Wall Street expectations. And much of the good news from the quarter came from the company's wireless business, which was driven by big sales of Apple's iPhone 3G. Specifically, AT&T gained a total of 1.2 million new subscribers to reach a total of 78.2 million.

The company activated more than 1.6 million iPhone 3G devices during the first quarter. And its overall wireless data revenue increased 38.6 percent to $3.2 billion. Growth was driven mostly by messaging, Internet access, e-mail, access to applications, and related services.

"I think the 1.6 million sales of the iPhone in this environment was very strong," Randall Stephenson, AT&T's CEO, said during the conference call. "Despite economic pressures, we had a solid first quarter."

Sales of Apple's iPhone, which AT&T sells exclusively in the U.S., provided the biggest boost to AT&T's wireless business during the quarter. More than 40 percent of the 1.6 million new iPhone subscribers that AT&T activated during the quarter were new to the company. AT&T said these customers tend to spend about 1.6 times more on wireless data services than other AT&T customers. What's more, the churn rate, or the rate at which customers dump the service, is much lower for iPhone users than for other AT&T customers, the company said.

The high ARPU or average revenue per user gained on iPhone sales helped AT&T boost its overall profit margins on wireless data services to more than 40 percent. And Stephenson said the company expects to continue to maintain these margins throughout the year.

Still, AT&T is spending a great deal of money upfront on subsidies to attract these new subscribers. AT&T sells the 8GB version of the device for $199 with a two-year contract and the 16GB version for $299 with a two-year contract. But the devices themselves unsubsidized cost $599 for the 8GB version and $699 for the 16GB models.

AT&T hopes that it can make up the difference in cost by charging at least $70 a month for a voice and data plan that goes with the iPhone, but the company still must pay the upfront cost of the phone. Stephenson said that the dilution experienced from these costs improved dramatically for the company. And he noted that the iPhone has provided a tremendous amount of growth for the company and has helped AT&T acquire some of the industry's highest value customers.

AT&T also saw strong sales from integrated devices, which are non-cell phone devices, like monitoring devices, that operate on AT&T's wireless network. The company said it improved sales of these services by 60 percent compare to a year ago.

Additionally, AT&T's wireline broadband service performed well during the quarter. For its U-verse service, AT&T added 284,000 new TV subscribers in the quarter for a total of 1.3 million.

Even though AT&T saw strong growth in its new businesses, the company was still dragged down by its traditional phone business. AT&T has suffered from consumers migration away from landline phones toward cell phones and other services offered from competitors, like the cable companies.

The slumping economy has accelerated this trend somewhat. Stephenson said during the call that the troubled economy affected the company's declining traditional landline business the most. He said he didn't see any drastic change in business or economic conditions during the first quarter of this year compared to the fourth quarter of 2008. And he noted that the positive momentum the company saw in wireless and its U-verse business had more to do with the products than any momentum from the economy.

And even though the company did relatively well in these growth markets during the quarter, he also said the company was feeling some pressure from the ailing economy.

"As employment is reduced at large business customer, we've seen some reduction in the company-paid wireless devices, which typically have higher ARPU," he said. "And we see consumers try to manage their spend better."

As a result, he said a lot of consumers are migrating from pay-per-use data plans to unlimited packages, which has helped some customers reduce their bills. But in other cases, he noted that some customers are reducing their data usage altogether.

"We are looking at things we can do from a pricing standpoint to deal with this," he said. "We would like to see them continue to move to data packages and not reduce or block their data usage."

The economy wasn't the only drag on AT&T's earnings. The company is also feeling the weight of expensive retiree benefits. The company counted more than $400 million in retiree expenses during the quarter. This expense shaved off about 5 cents per share from its earnings, the company said. AT&T is currently in labor negotiations with its biggest union, the Communications Workers of America . And health care benefits for retirees is one of several issues the two sides are trying to hammer out. AT&T's union workers have been without a contract since April 5.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from Wireless
New Droid ad: iPhone is 'digitally clueless'
Phone photo quality interests Google, Microsoft
Lenovo mobile push could hurt PC side
FCC seeks comment on spectrum re-allocation
Wireless operators stop whining about ads
Verizon nixes holiday ads to continue AT&T-bashing
IP2 eyes low-cost mobile service for developing countries
AT&T gives up on Verizon ad lawsuit
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by bonesbautista April 22, 2009 9:34 AM PDT
If ATTWS doesn't get their network working more reliably pretty quick, they're going to lose my business and that of my company for good. I'm already picking up VZW for my new employees and porting out the ATTWS lines that expire, but the ETF for the remaining lines is starting to appeal to me.
Reply to this comment
by jjcompliant April 22, 2009 10:00 AM PDT
att is not getting it customers are leaving to better companies due to bad customer services they have become arogant and forget who made then number after 30 years of residental and internet services i felt att to terminate my service i was transfered to 6 people and then i was on hold just to terminate a service it took me and hour on the phone this is not the way to keep customers and eventually they will have to stop holding customers hostage with contract and do it the old att way with great customer services and great programs and product
Reply to this comment
by tekwiz4u April 22, 2009 10:07 AM PDT
Maybe if they had better coverage and lower their pricing, the results may be different. They're right saying its not the iPhone, but doesn't take a rocket scientist to explain why earnings are so bleak.
Reply to this comment
by TimGray--2008 April 22, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
I also agree AT&T wireless problem lies in it's world renown really bad customer service and their horrible coverage. I personally will not be renewing my contract for the 5 phones I have with them.

Problem is that all the other competitors are horrible as well. Why is it that Cellphone companies in America pride themselves in Bad service and Bad policies? I'd pay a premium to go with a company that does not treat it's customers as a "annoyance".
Reply to this comment
by larry3rv April 22, 2009 3:47 PM PDT
I couldn't have said it better myself. My attempts to shop around for a better than ATT deal turned up the same pricing deal, more or less, from all the carriers. Cell phone service is too expensive.
by fp1955 April 22, 2009 10:31 AM PDT
I don't know where you people live, but I have never had a problem with coverage with AT&T. Their pricing is in line with their major competitors, but not the cutthroat resellers such as Metro PCS and TRACFONE. The customer service has never been a problem for me, but then I use their online customer service option. If you want to talk about sorry customer service and coverage try switching to Sprint and you will realize just how good AT&T is in comparison. Also, to tekwiz4u, the earnings were not bleak for the wireless division, only for landline business. Pay attention when you read news stories, especially before you make a commet.
Reply to this comment
by sting7k April 22, 2009 10:38 AM PDT
I guess I'm alone in saying that I have had great service with my iPhone 3G and the 2 times I had to deal with AT&T were both fine as well. Maybe if some customers went in with a better attitude instead of just being angry that their phone is giving them problems the reps would be more friendly. I was glad to be free of Tmobile and get on AT&T. I would like their texting plans to be cheaper.
Reply to this comment
by mikestatic1 April 22, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
I won't buy an iPhone because I refuse to deal with AT&T - I had them for about 5 years and the service was terrible.

You have to be careful who you sign these exclusive deals with, if you sign them at all. It is severely limiting your potential sales.
Reply to this comment
by sharmajunior April 22, 2009 10:44 AM PDT
I have personally never had a problem with AT&T, on the other hand, I had VZW and I had to break their contract because I never had a signal in the other half of my house. They didn't work with me, instead blaming it on my house. I mean c'mon, you know you have bad coverage there so let me get out. "They threatened me by posting the cancellation fee to my credit rating." What I did was I contacted my district attorney and filed a complaint against them. Then they came running back with their lies.

The fact is NO COMPANY IS GOOD AND COMPLETE. Everyone's preference depends on the area they live in. If you want coverage, go get Sprint, then you'll know what coverage is....being cut off every 2 mins into a call. Don't even talk about Nextel chirp. A chirp now takes more than 10 seconds to reach its destination. Nextel was better when it was independent.
Reply to this comment
by TKE49 April 22, 2009 1:33 PM PDT
"A chirp now takes more than 10 seconds to reach its destination"...

WRONG. Where'd you get that information? The chirp is almost instantaneous. If it were behind 10 seconds, you'd have trouble talking to the other person - which is not the case.

But you are correct about Sprint coverage. If you want coverage - and a blazing fast data network - Sprint would be your best bet.
by sharmajunior April 22, 2009 7:58 PM PDT
Exactly my point. I know that the chirp is instantaneous or should be. But i have experienced times when I have timed it to be around 10 secs well actually 9 secs. But still it is a long time.
by Eballs April 22, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
AT&T is terrible... if the Pre is what its supposed to be, good bye death star
Reply to this comment
by lightwave300k April 22, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
Shouldn't the headline be: AT&T dragged down by traditional phone service
Because from what i can see iPhone has increased AT&T's profits by adding new customers and increasing wireless data revenue.
Reply to this comment
by k9jdk April 22, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
I'm a relatively new (1/09) AT&T U-verse customer with phone included. Had traditional AT&T land line service for years, as well as cell phone for the family.

No problems with either their services or support. Family likes U-verse. I'm happy.
Reply to this comment
by aeshraghi April 22, 2009 1:18 PM PDT
I am a frequent traveler, live in Northern Virginia and have been a Verizon customer for years. I used AT&T mobile service in 2000 and was never happy with it because of the coverage and lack of service/bandwidth during the peak hours. I hesitated for a while to switch to AT&T but finally I did and I am glad I did. The coverage and service has worked great for me. Needless to say that iPhone experience is way better than BB. In fact every week I use more and more of iPhone apps to interacts with internet and less laptop and web sites/apps.
Reply to this comment
by TomMariner April 23, 2009 9:56 AM PDT
The story here is innovation - You don't see it listed on the Apple balance sheet, but inventive products and ways of running a company have made more of a difference to both Apple and AT&T than any number on their accounting records.

A product that didn't exist 18 months ago changing the fortunes of a regional Bell is big news.
Reply to this comment
by apmarlow April 27, 2009 4:16 AM PDT
There are so many compaints about the iPhone compaired to the amount of time on the market. Checkout http://www.theappleiphonezone.blogspot.com

The length of complaints are astounding!!!
Reply to this comment
by Poshie232 May 8, 2009 7:00 AM PDT
I have been stuck in a cell phone contract that just self renewed without informing me or getting my approval so instead of the two years I thought I was in for I ended up having to pay for four years. But now I have canceled the contract and good riddance to it, I will never sign a contract for a cell phone again. I decided to get a prepaid Tracfone instead and I have been very pleasantly surprised to find how much cheaper they are. Long distance and some international calls are the same price as local calls which are starting to make my land line look obsolete. Prepaid is definitely better than contract and I can recommend Tracfone as one of the cheapest.
Reply to this comment
(18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right