January 29, 2009 1:19 PM PST

BlackBerry Storm parts pricier than iPhone's

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 12 comments
(Credit: James Martin/CBS Interactive)

Market research firm iSuppli has taken apart the BlackBerry Storm and discovered that the sum of its parts is worth more than those of Apple's iPhone 3G.

Components used to build new Research In Motion smartphone cost about $203, according to iSuppli. Verizon Wireless, the exclusive carrier of the Storm, sells the device for $199 after rebates and with a two-year service contract. Meanwhile, the total cost of components in Apple's 8-gigabyte iPhone 3G, which was introduced last summer, is $174. AT&T, the iPhone's exclusive carrier, sells the 8GB device for $199 with a two-year service contract.

These total device prices don't include the cost of software, licensing of patents, or distribution, but rather just the cost of the actual physical components. While the roughly $29 difference may not seem like much, it certainly adds up after millions of phones are sold.

Neither Verizon nor RIM has disclosed how many BlackBerry Storms have been sold, but published reports suggest that RIM sold about 500,000 of the devices during the first month the phone was on sale. Apple sold 1.1 million units of the first-generation iPhone, by comparison, in the first two months it was on the market. And sales after that quickly ramped up.

So why are Storm's components more expensive than those of the iPhone?

There are a likely several reasons. For one, the iPhone 3G is a second-generation product, and Apple may be getting better component prices from suppliers. But iSuppli also notes that the Storm is a more complicated device that requires more components. According to the research firm, the Storm's total component count is 1,177, of which 151 are mechanical in nature. The iPhone 3G includes 1,116 components.

The Storm also packs in more wireless technologies than the iPhone. For example, it offers the EV-DO air standard, along with CDMA 2000, GSM, WCDMA, and HSDPA. This allows the device to roam around the world on different carrier networks.

Another reason the Storm may be more expensive is because it's using an expensive chip from Qualcomm. The Qualcomm MSM7600 baseband processor costs about $35 and accounts for 17.2 percent of the Storm's total component cost.

The Storm is also more expensive than other RIM devices, such as the BlackBerry Bold, which costs about $177 to build. The Bold uses Marvell Technology Group's PXA9xx Integrated Baseband processor, which is less expensive than the Qualcomm chip. But iSuppli says the cost differential can mainly be attributed to the Storm's touchscreen and its supporting electronics.

The Storm, RIM's first touch-screen device, was supposed to be Verizon's iPhone killer. But customers who bought the device are complaining of buggy software and hardware glitches. A Wall Street Journal article published earlier this week suggests that Verizon and RIM rushed the device to market, perhaps before it was really ready. The newspaper notes that Jim Balsillie, RIM's co-CEO, said the companies reached the Black Friday deadline "by the skin of their teeth," after they had missed a planned October debut.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from Wireless
Q&A: Researcher Karsten Nohl on mobile eavesdropping
Online holiday sales hit $27 billion
Amazon touts top products of 2009
Leaked Nexus One documents: $530 unlocked, $180 with T-Mobile
Nokia hits Apple with latest patent complaint
Android and iPhone users not so different after all
AT&T resumes online iPhone sales in NY
GSM crypto code cracked, engineer says
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by darthstupid January 29, 2009 6:22 PM PST
While interesting it's not particularly useful info. The real essence of either device is in the software not the hardware. Currently the iPhone has the better software, no matter the cost of the hardware.
Reply to this comment
by SkateNY January 29, 2009 10:38 PM PST
When you know that the iPhone/iPod is selling like hotcakes, why would you want to develop for someone else?
by darthstupid January 29, 2009 11:31 PM PST
My comment wasn't referring to 3rd party apps. I was referring to the system software. Even given its faults (lack of cut/copy/paste for instance) it still is better than anything currently out there for most people.

However the iphone has been very successful in building up an impressive list of quality 3rd party apps.
by SkateNY January 29, 2009 10:36 PM PST
Fact is, RIm spent a great deal of time, money and other resources in the service of offerin the latest and greatest iPod killer. It didn't work out. Even their own products stack up better than the Storm when compared to the iPhone and the iPod touch (which, by downloading one among several apps from the Apple app store, can easily be converted to a phone without a contract.).

RIM is in desperation mode, and their recent products throw this reality in very sharp relief.
Reply to this comment
by seven7dust January 30, 2009 12:18 AM PST
Rim should stick to their keyboard phones
or should make a phone like
the Samsung Epix witha real keyboard and touchscreen
their touch interface is a joke
Reply to this comment
by artistjoh January 30, 2009 12:30 AM PST
The minute the iPhone launched RIM was between a rock and a hard place. If they took the same sort of extended time that Apple took to refine their product then the iPhone would have no competition for too long a period of time and would get too far ahead and would dominate the market. On the other hand if they rush a product to market to meet the iPhone head on they risk producing an inferior product that does not meet expectations. The Storm appears to have done that with both hardware and software bugs, and the G1 has done that with ill considered battery life problems.

It is a replay of how Apple found success in the MP3 market. They kept quiet or even denied they wanted to enter the music business while they developed the product. They allowed commentators to scoff at the product because of their perception that it "lacked" various features which helped lull their competition into false sense of security. As soon as the competition realized the public loved the device they rushed out iPod killers that theoretically had more or better features and just as they did Apple would roll a new version of the assembly line that made the competitors "new" products look old fashioned, and all the way they kept to their simplified core and the public loved it while competing manufacturers found them selves on an endless conveyer belt called "catch up".

It is very difficult for any manufacturer (like RIM) trying to regain momentum after an extraordinary product launch like the iPhone. Time, and the necessity to get to market ASAP is their big enemy.
Reply to this comment
by February 2, 2009 6:57 AM PST
Who owns research firm "iSuppli"? Is it "iApple"?!!!!
Reply to this comment
by elculotumay February 10, 2009 6:31 AM PST
Iphone is the very best, but it slacked off when it came down to picture texting or video texting. i'm a picture sending freak and with the iphone i can't do that, i would have to email the picture. but not everyone has email on their cell.
Reply to this comment
by trewbux May 4, 2009 11:22 AM PDT
MMS is coming with the 3.0 software release this summer
by wren1700 February 19, 2009 9:07 AM PST
Check out calanmobile.com for OEM blackberry parts!
Reply to this comment
by habboud July 7, 2009 4:59 PM PDT
I need a phone to use internationally, like Lebanon for example!
Lebanon uses GSM. I found both Blackberry Storm and iPhone has GSM. I am confused between both. I want to be able to text a lot, browse internet and go on facebook anytime using wireless internet ofcourse! As well as downloading a lot of songs to my phone.
Which one do u think will work best for me??
Any suggestions??!!
Reply to this comment
by BlackberryP October 28, 2009 5:19 PM PDT
Blackberry and iPhone have the same mobile apps, what I want to know is how fast is the upload to a site, and how well is the usability on each respective smart phone.
www.fonlogix.us/blackberry-cell-phone-replacement-parts.html
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right