Campaign to delay DTV transition gets a boost
It looks as though the digital TV transition will likely be delayed now that a group of Senate Republicans agreed to a plan that would push it back to June 12.
Senate Republicans blocked Democratic efforts to push back the deadline just last week. But it looks like they've had a change of heart after working with Democrats to hammer out amendments to the bill. The DTV Delay Act, as it is being called, is expected to be voted on early next week.
The switch from analog TV broadcast to digital broadcast was mandated by Congress in 2005 with the deadline date of February 17, 2009. On this date all TV broadcasters are supposed to stop broadcasting their signals in analog and broadcast only in digital. The switch will free up valuable wireless spectrum, which the Federal Communications Commission has already allocated to public safety or auctioned off for new services, mainly broadband wireless.
But over the past few months, government officials have warned that too many Americans are not prepared for the switch. In fact more than 6.5 million U.S. households are still not prepared for the transition, according to the Nielsen Co. Many of these individuals are minorities.
The government and broadcasters have been running public service announcements to get the word out about the switch. The government also allotted $1.3 billion for a voucher program to provide consumers with $40 coupons to defray the cost of converter boxes that will allow older TVs to accept the digital signal.
But the government has run out of money for the vouchers, and as of Wednesday the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which administers the voucher program, reported that there was a waiting list of 2.6 million for new coupons. What's more, many consumers say they have had trouble redeeming coupons or their coupons have expired already.
Democrats, including President Obama, have suggested delaying the transition to give people more time to get ready. But Republicans in both the House and Senate have raised concerns that delaying the switchover would confuse consumers and add costs for television stations that would have to continue broadcasting both analog and digital signals. A delay would also mean burdening wireless companies, which have already spent billions of dollars to buy the spectrum from the federal government. And it would delay efforts by public safety agencies that have been waiting for the spectrum to be freed up.
After some negotiation and some amendments to the bill, it looks as though Senate Republicans are now on board with delaying the date for the transition.
Under the new deal, the transition date will be delayed until June 12. But TV stations will be allowed to switch to digital signals before that date. And if a station chooses to switch to digital before the official transition date, the vacant spectrum will be made available to public safety officials.
The bill will also allow consumers with expired coupons for converter boxes to apply for new coupons. The coupons had an expiration date of 90 days. The bill also extends the deadline to apply for a coupon from March 31 to July 31.
The Senate is expected to vote on the DTV Delay Act next week. But a bill will still have to get through the House before a delay becomes official. The House Energy and Commerce Committee delayed consideration of a DTV delay bill earlier this week after the Senate had blocked its initial bill.
Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie. 



Hey, maybe analog broadcasts are useless because of the crap they are broadcasting?
A bit dumb is an understatement. If you have cable, this doesn't effect you one bit.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/162329-Hawaii_DTV_Switch_Causes_Limited_Confusion.php
I think you misread Xone's post. He's saying that he got the CECBs for when his satellite signal craps out. That way, he switches on his CECBs and he can at least watch local TV.
The form that you filled out to get the coupons, you lied that you did not have sat, that is how you got coupons.
Actually the application doesn't say anywhere that people with sat/cable can't get coupons. They only ask that you acknowledge it if you do. I checked that box and still got a coupon some 7 months ago.
Another site was talking about other projects that would be delayed or impacted by further delays in the transition. One was a case of a broadcaster that will be selling one of their extra digital transmitters to another set of broadcasters after they complete the transtion, and that could be affected by any delay in the transition date.
Also the issues of the analog transmitters using more power, and running two transmitters. One site indicated it cost around $20,000 a month for the extra transmitter.
I hope most stations opt to shutdown their analog signal anyway. One station in my area has already shutdown their analog transmitter early, partly to help people ensure they have what they need to keep getting channels after the complete shutdown.
Plenty of good reasons to delay it...as usual and will be the case for years....Obama inherited the flawed, flunked programs and policies of W Jr. Incompetence and mis-management can't hide forever, and Obama will have to clean up yet another W. mess. Is there a common theme going on in America today? .....YES.... the government and private industry are bankrupt and out of money....where are they electing to get more.....hahaha.....Yes....you and I...the common people. Ok, enough ranting, but lets ensure we have a progrqam that is supported, funded and EXECUTED before we launch Milions of Americans into the "snow storm in hell."
Live, Learn and Awaken!
With DTV you need a stronger S/N ratio or you will have problems. We have already had local folks (who actually were able to get the coupons) say they now receive fewer channels compared to analog. They will have to put up an outside antenna to get the S/N ratio they need to equal analog coverage. Yes, not a super big deal or expense yet no one bothers to mention this during those no stop silly ads they play about the benefits of dtv
.
In the end it will probably be for the better but this plan was well, not very well planned. Like what about folks on the Gulf Coast who depend on battery powered TV's during hurricanes?
DTV needs to be rolled out for 1 year while the analog airwaves are still going for that year with constant messages telling people that analog goes in one year please make sure their dtv boxes are working and setup right. This gives people time to install and test without having to worry about loosing TV while they do it.
Another Bush screw the people move. DTV is a joke to start with and only benefits corporations and the government.
Robert
- by edorsey2 January 27, 2009 1:27 PM PST
- This is a complete waste of time. If this bill passes, it will bring a ton of financial stress to a lot of companies. If people are dumb enough to not know what is going on, on February 17 they deserve not to be able to watch TV. Who cares if they can't watch TV anyways? We still have radio, and the phone to communicate. It is not a big deal, and if they haven't gotten off their lazy <delete expletive here> to prevent a problem from arising then they might actual be forced to once February 17th rolls around. If I could I would personally go slap each member of the senate in the face and tell them to get real, and 4 more months will not effect the situation enough for it to matter. This is complete and utter B.S.
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (33 Comments)