• On TechRepublic: 2 humane ways to fire someone
November 4, 2008 3:59 PM PST

FCC opens free 'white space' spectrum

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 9 comments

Google and other technology companies that wanted access to more free spectrum have gotten their wish.

On Tuesday, the Federal Communications Commission unanimously agreed to open up unused broadcast TV spectrum for unlicensed use.

Despite protests from TV broadcasters, entertainers, professional sports leagues, church pastors, and some congressional leaders, the FCC approved rules for devices using spectrum that sits between broadcast TV channels. This 300MHz to 400MHz of unused spectrum known as "white spaces" is considered prime spectrum for offering wireless broadband services because it can travel long distances and penetrate through walls.

"As an engineer, I was really gratified to see that the FCC decided to put science over politics," Larry Page, co-founder of Google, said on his blog. "For years the broadcasting lobby and others have tried to spread fear and confusion about this technology, rather than allow the FCC's engineers to simply do their work."

Technology companies such as Google, Motorola, Microsoft, and Dell have been lobbying the FCC for years to open this spectrum for unlicensed use. The hope is that the spectrum could be used to augment existing wireless services or eventually be used to create new wireless broadband services.

Page, who has been a strong advocate for opening white spaces, applauded the FCC 's move and said it would spur massive technological innovation.

"We will soon have 'Wi-Fi on steroids' since these spectrum signals have much longer range than today's Wi-Fi technology and broadband access can be spread using fewer base stations resulting in better coverage at lower cost," he said. "And it is wonderful that the FCC has adopted the same successful unlicensed model used for Wi-Fi, which has resulted in a projected 1 billion Wi-Fi chips being produced this year. Now that the FCC has set the rules, I'm sure that we'll see similar growth in products to take advantage of this spectrum."

But TV broadcasters and wireless microphone companies have long opposed the use of this spectrum, saying it will interfere with their services. In the past few weeks, these opponents, along with several congressional leaders, have urged the FCC to allow more public comments before the vote would take place. It came as little surprise that these groups were unhappy with the FCC's rules.

"While we appreciate the FCC's attempt to address significant issues raised by broadcasters and others, every American who values interference-free TV should be concerned by today's commission vote," Dennis Wharton, executive vice president of the National Association of Broadcasters, said in a statement. "By moving the 'white space' vote forward, the commission appears to have bypassed meaningful public or peer review in a proceeding of grave importance to the future of television."

The FCC, which has been examining this issue for six years, finished testing several proof-of-concept devices this summer to see if companies can develop products that use buffer spectrum between licensed broadcast channels. The commission's Office of Engineering Technology (OET) found that sensing technology alone was not 100 percent effective in preventing interference. But when coupled with geolocation technology, which uses GPS technology along with a data base of known services using certain spectrum channels, interference was greatly reduced.

The commission took these recommendations into account when establishing its rules, which will require fixed and portable unlicensed devices to include geolocation technology in addition to spectrum-sensing technology. For some low-power devices that do not use geolocation technology and use sensing technology exclusively, the FCC said it will require a much more rigorous approval process.

The FCC said it also had addressed issue for wireless microphone manufacturers and their customers. For example, the FCC said that locations where wireless microphones are used, such as sporting venues and event and production facilities, can be registered in the geolocation data base and will be protected in the same way as other services. And even though sensing technology isn't completely full-proof, the commission is requiring that devices use sensing technology to see if wireless microphones are being used in the same spectrum bands.

In addition to these rules, the FCC will require that all white space devices be tested and certified by the FCC Laboratory, just as they require testing and certification of all other wireless devices, including cell phones and wireless routers.

During the meeting, the FCC commissioners noted that Tuesday's vote was only the beginning. And they tried to assure the public that they would continue to listen to concerns of broadcasters and wireless microphone manufacturers and users to ensure that interference issues were mitigated.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Wireless
Windows Mobile loses nearly a third of market share
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
AT&T: Verizon ads are 'blatantly false'
HTC expects rough fourth quarter
Dell unveils Android-based Mini 3 smartphone
Qualcomm readies 3G/4G mobile chipsets
Report: Motorola looks to sell set-top box biz
Powering cell phone towers with wind
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by gbmodern November 4, 2008 4:23 PM PST
Thank you congress! I have been hoping for this for the past month. This is one of the best desicions they have made in the past decade! Imaging getting wifi like we get tv or cell phone signals: everywhere and for free. This is going to be awesome!
Reply to this comment
by Sanjiv Swarup November 4, 2008 4:48 PM PST
Countries like India and China should be lobbied by the likes of Google to do the same.
Reply to this comment
by SamGreco November 4, 2008 10:20 PM PST
While I like the idea of opening up spectrum, I personally know at least a dozen small businesses that rent audio or video equipment that will be losing a ton of money on their stock of wireless microphones alone.

Perhaps a bit more discussion was in order?

I think at least a few of these businesses will not survive this in these economic times.
Reply to this comment
by fredmenace November 4, 2008 11:04 PM PST
Hear, hear. The number of people affected and the money lost will probably equal whatever is gained. This was very much a "lalala we don't hear you, we don't care, you don't have millions of lobbying dollars lalalala" decision.
by cmstratton November 5, 2008 7:36 AM PST
The same concerns were presented when WiFi was originally going through testing. All of the details aren't available of course, but I haven't seen anything that says existing wireless microphones would be obsolete and need to be replaced.

In fact it seems just the opposite - any new types of equipment/technology using this spectrum will be required to not interfere with existing equipment like wireless microphones.

You can't please everyone, and this opens the way for technology that could completely change the way we live. Who knows, maybe some of that technology will make those old wireless microphones obsolete and allow your friends' businesses to get better products at lower cost that have more functionality, thereby giving them a competitive advantage.

Let's keep the discussion open on this, but let's all have an open mind and not immediately conclude the sky is falling.
by tim.lsr November 5, 2008 9:55 AM PST
I am not an expert and I am making assumptions. The wireless microphones mentioned would be specialized licensed devices used at high profile venues, likely not rental equipment. These would not be the standard unlicensed devices that are widely available and easily rented. We are talking about a wireless spectrum that has been off limits to the public. Any microphone or other device using this spectrum until now would have required extensive FCC licensing, documentation, and fees.
Think - I want to start an over the air TV station.
by chrisfrary November 6, 2008 7:23 AM PST
Well technically if it is going to affect that equipment then it is illegally using this spectrum. They got away with it too long, now it's time for everyone to enjoy it. I am sick of manufacturers not doing enough to deal with interference. They are too lazy and want to make a quick buck.
by FireyIce01 November 5, 2008 4:54 AM PST
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. The telecom companies have a stronghold on broadband internet, and charge unreasonable rates to subscribers. There are huge sections of America that are monopolized by one or two companies providing the only available broadband, and satellite internet is neither economical or equivalent. This is a huge step forward for rural Americans who may have previously only had the option of dial up internet. This will also force the telecom companies to be more competitive in their pricing if they wish to keep business. Furthermore, to Sam and Fred - what makes you think that this is going to impact these businesses? As was stated in the article, these audio devices should not be impacted by the new devices that are being made. If you're so worried about wireless microphones, you should lobby for a ban on cell phones, as the multitude of them will cause way more trouble than these wifi on steriods devices, which won't likely be carried around by virtually everyone in the country.
Reply to this comment
by JayWes November 6, 2008 3:21 AM PST
Wireless microphones are used not only at large stadiums but in auditoriums at business;s, churches, government enties, Who is going to register a;; of these items?
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right