Using the mobile phone as a credit card

Inside Contactless offers a MicroPass technology that can be embedded in stickers that are affixed to mobile phones so they can be used to make payments or access transit systems and buildings.
(Credit: Inside Contactless)I admit it; I've been put off by the term "contactless payments." But it's an emerging area that deserves some attention.
If you are in Asia, you know what I'm talking about. People there have been making payments with their mobile phones using what's called "near-field communications." Just wave the handset in front of a reader and voila, the transaction is done.
In the U.S., we've had RFID technology embedded in cards. But the long-term goal is to eliminate the need to carry credit cards, building access badges and transit cards and just turn the phone into an all-in-one device.
Well, while the mobile phone has turned into an entertainment device over the last few years, it hasn't become the payment and access device in the U.S. that was envisioned when contactless payment strategies were born back in 2005 and earlier.
And now, with the economic downturn, the near-field communications industry is likely to take even longer to take off. Broad adoption of near-field communications will take longer than expected now, as long as three to four years, predicts Shyam Krishnan, an industry analyst at Frost & Sullivan.
So, a French company called Inside Contactless has come up with an interim solution that will let people turn their phones into credit cards and transit cards. Inside's MicroPass technology will be embedded into a sticker that can then be affixed to a phone, wallet, or anything else.
The company, which entered the U.S. bank card market with a microprocessor-based chip in 2005 and is backed by Nokia, Motorola and Samsung, recently announced that Colorado Plastics will be producing stickers using the MicroPass technology.
Soon, we may see people waving their mobile phones, iPods, ID badges, or wallets in front of readers to get on the subway or buy coffee at Starbucks.
"It's a cool way to pay; convenient," said Charles Walton, executive vice president of the payments business at Inside. "It turns the phone into a super wallet."
"It's a card in a different format," said Jonathan Collins, principal analyst in ABI Research's RFID and contactless group. "We've had American Express fobs, but they didn't prove to be overly popular. Stickers are more useful."
The MicroPass technology should fare better with regard to security scrutiny than the much-maligned NXP Mifare Classic RFID chip, which has been found to have severe flaws and can be cloned.
"We're using a microprocessor with open-standard security techniques, not a fixed memory, proprietary security scheme" like Mifare Classic, Walton said. The applications implemented using MicroPass "cannot be cloned in that way."
Adoption will depend on how quickly banks, retailers and phone companies can agree on standards and implementation, as well as on whether people are ready to merge their phone and their wallet.
"There has to be a benefit for the end user," Krishnan said. "It all boils down to its convenience, at the end of the day."
I'd be interested in hearing reader thoughts on whether this technology would be useful.
Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.






Why can't we do that??? Oh, yea. VISA and Mastercard, that's why.
There's one inherent flaw with the argument that if you lose your phone you will notice right away and be able to cancel the sticker's usage. The problem with wireless payment doesn't lie in losing the device/sticker/card, the problem is that the data on the card can be cloned just by walking by the wrong person who has a card reader. Therefore, you can have your account "stolen" even though you still have the sticker and you can still use it.
That's the problem with wireless payment technology.
I also like the scheme used by PayPal (never used it myself) where you are called and asked to enter a pin to confirm the transaction. That will slow things down, but it might be a nice touch for the first time you shop somewhere new or try to purchase something that costs over a certain dollar threshhold.
Sounds like the same arguments that were used in the '70s about credit cards. The banks must have the same protections for this payment method as for credit cards.
This background may not seem relevant, but it goes to the point that this new device needs to be flexible, secure, and allow me to keep track of my spending. I don't just have ONE credit card (a personal problem?), and at times I want to use my Debit card. How will this thing help me switch between my accounts? Perhaps it can be my primary Debit and Credit card, but I don't know enough yet to say it will really make me carry less stuff and be better than what I currently have. No one has offered me one of the proximity credit cards I see the readers for, so I haven't been able to try those. I use the Mobile SpeedPass and love that, but wish I could use it everywhere. I've even programmed it to know I don't need a receipt at the pump (I can only use it at Mobile, and only use it for gas, so it's reported on my credit card bill). Gas stations require my billing Zip code now, so that's a layer of protection should I lose the SpeedPass. What's to keep someone from using this stick-on access to my accounts if its lost or stolen?
Bottom line, I like the idea of it, but need more information to know if it will really be better.
BTW, I solved the receipt-for-cash problem by asking a simple question as I hand them the money: "Can I have a receipt for that?" I have yet to find a business that will not provide one upon request, even if they have to press a couple more buttons to print it out.
-
by dennis_wolfers
October 25, 2008 8:28 AM PDT
- It's a step in the right direction!
-
Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)