• On CHOW: How to avoid dirty looks at cafes
September 26, 2008 4:00 AM PDT

Will Americans ever call on mobile banking?

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 19 comments
Share

More cell phone operators and financial companies are jumping on the mobile financial-service bandwagon, but it remains to be seen if U.S. cell phone subscribers are even interested.

Sprint Nextel announced on Thursday that it will be the latest U.S. wireless carrier to offer its mobile-phone customers the ability to bank from their mobile handsets. The new MyMoneyManager service is a free downloadable application that enables cell phone subscribers to check bank balances, pay bills, and find nearby branches or ATMs from their handsets.

Sprint has initially partnered with four banks, BB&T, Citibank, IBC Bank, and PNC Bank, to provide the application. It plans to add other banks at a future date. And it will eventually bundle the application into some of its handsets.

Credit card giant Visa also announced several mobile initiatives Thursday. Specifically, it plans to enable its customers to transfer money, make payments, and receive real-time account notification alerts on their Nokia phones, as well as cell phones using the Google Android operating system. Visa also struck a mobile deal with U.S. Bank that will enable individuals to make money transfers from one Visa cardholder's account to another.

Initiatives to make bill payments and other banking tasks phone-friendly have been hyped over the past couple of years. Mobile banking is one of several new mobile services, such as music downloading and TV viewing, that have been enabled by faster 3G wireless networks.

And for the past couple of years, financial institutions and cell phone operators have been rolling out new services and applications.

Most banks participating
Most of the major U.S. banks already offer some kind of mobile-banking technology, according to market research firm Celent. And the two largest mobile operators in the States have also introduced mobile-payment and banking options.

AT&T launched a mobile-payment application made available through Firethorn, which has since been acquired by Qualcomm, in March 2007. The telecommunications giant has also been running trials with Nokia to turn cell phones into debit cards, allowing people to make purchases with their cell phones. And Verizon Wireless, which also uses Firethorn, launched its mobile-banking application in January 2008.

But despite the fact that there are many options and opportunities for cell phone subscribers to access their banking information and pay their bills on their mobile phones, the uptake for these applications and services has been pretty weak. According to Forrester Research, only about 3 percent of mobile subscribers in North America check financial accounts on their mobile phone at least once a month. This rate of adoption is lower than that of services like music downloading, which 5 percent of mobile users say they do at least once monthly.

"Mobile banking and bill payment has been available for a while now," said Charles Golvin, a senior analyst at Forrester Research. "But it has yet to set the world on fire."

With more than 85 percent of the U.S. population owning a cell phone and more than 47 million people banking online, it would seem like a natural fit for Americans to migrate to mobile banking. But the reality is that getting people to use their handsets for doing more than making phone calls hasn't been easy.

Even though mobile operators have seen revenue for data services go up recently, only 11 percent of cell phone users access the mobile Web at least once a month, according to Forrester Research. Only 5 percent of mobile users download music onto their cell phone at least once a month, and only 3 percent watch mobile videos on their phone.

Not a huge shock
So it's not a huge shock that so few mobile subscribers are banking from their phones. One of the major hurdles for mobile banking has been that most of the services have either required users to download an application onto their phones or to use a mobile browser to navigate to a Web site formatted for a cell phone screen.

Other than owners of the Apple iPhone, most mobile-phone users do not like downloading applications, Golvin said. But even if an application is preloaded on a phone, there is no guarantee that it will be used. And for carrier-specific applications, mobile operators have to strike deals with individual banking institutions.

"Nobody is going to switch their cell phone provider because that provider has a mobile-banking deal with their bank," Golvin said. "And vice versa, no one is going to switch their bank because their cell phone provider offers mobile banking. It's just not a top priority."

Besides the convenience factor, another reason mobile banking hasn't take off is that there are few compelling reasons to access bank or bill-paying information on a mobile phone when most people in the U.S. have easy access to a computer. With overdraft protection, automatic bill paying, and convenient and easy access to ATM cash machines, most people don't need up-to-the minute check balance information, nor do they need to be able to pay bills while walking around town.

But that's not to say that there aren't some situations in which mobile banking would be useful. The service could be helpful for people who are traveling. Users also may appreciate getting text alerts that certain bills are due or that the overdraft protection has been accessed.

"Banking has been a compelling application for consumers on the PC," Golvin said. "But like any other Web application, it needs to find its own value proposition in the mobile world. Not everything that is popular on PCs will make it to cell phones."

Fertile soil in foreign lands
That said, experts see mobile banking and other mobile financial services taking off outside the United States, where access to communications infrastructure and banks is limited.

There is a lot of opportunity for mobile financial services in the developing world, where more people are likely to have access to cell phones than they are to computers. What's more, people in the developing world have less access to banks and money machines. And many of the vendors in other countries don't accept credit cards or debit cards. Cell phones could end up being an important way to expand financial services for people in these regions of the world.

Some services have already seen big success. For example, Globe Telecom in the Philippines offers Gcash, a service that enables people to use their phones to pay for things and transfer funds. Mobile operator Safaricom has been offering its M-Pesa service to subscribers in Kenya to provide money transfers. And MTN, a mobile carrier in South Africa, has also been offering a mobile-banking solution.

"My prediction is that mobile banking will steadily grow in the U.S. and become just another channel that banks will offer," said Red Gillen, a senior analyst at Celent. "But outside the U.S., especially in emerging markets, mobile payments and mobile banking make a lot of sense. And that is where I see it being most useful."

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from Wireless
In new ad, AT&T, Luke Wilson say Verizon is slow
New Droid ad: iPhone is 'digitally clueless'
Phone photo quality interests Google, Microsoft
Lenovo mobile push could hurt PC side
FCC seeks comment on spectrum re-allocation
Wireless operators stop whining about ads
Verizon nixes holiday ads to continue AT&T-bashing
IP2 eyes low-cost mobile service for developing countries
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Shell Huber September 26, 2008 5:42 AM PDT
We should not use credit cards. 3% to 6% on seller. 0% to 49% on buyers?
Credit companies would love to have a piece of the action(transaction). Every transaction. Inflationary. Non productive. Like a the mob! No let's trust them by using our phones. Easier credit hook.
Just say no!
Reply to this comment
by paulsecic September 26, 2008 10:14 AM PDT
What if your cell phone is stolen? No way
by shadowself September 26, 2008 6:34 AM PDT
When they implement 256 bit AES encryption as well as other security layers available under IPv6 I'll consider it. Not before.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis September 26, 2008 2:20 PM PDT
Overly dramatic, much. I already use online banking, and have had NO problems with it other than a few 'phishing' attempts showing up in my e-mail, which I just delete and move on.
by cvaldes1831 September 26, 2008 7:14 AM PDT
You know, I don't care to squint at a teeny little cellphone screen when I want to pay my credit card. I'll just wait until I get home, where I can do this in front of a 24" widescreen monitor with a favorite beverage. It's faster that way since I don't need to scroll around the screen.

Now paying with a cellphone (like the Japanese have done for years), that's something else. I'd love to see that, but it will probably be 5-10 years in frickin' 'merika and my guess is that Verizon phones will only work at some stores, Sprint phones will work at others, etc.
Reply to this comment
by shanedr September 26, 2008 8:18 AM PDT
Why would I want to bank via mobile? My records are home, its easier from home, I can bank online 24 hours a day. Banking in person is most secure. Banking online from home is second most secure if you have a good firewall. Mobile banking is a crapshoot, both via connection and as a secure line. But most of all is the "why bother"?
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan September 26, 2008 8:20 AM PDT
Bank of America has been offering this service in most of the US for years now. The iPhone/Touch even have an app for it. But while the technology and back end are there, some states prohibit this service and BoA c annot offer it in a handful of states as a result.

I would LIKE to have access to that information from my Apple Touch.
Reply to this comment
by ddanckaert September 26, 2008 8:47 AM PDT
I access USAA and Wachovia via my iPhone's Safari web browser using the same encryption that I do when I'm using a desktop-based web browser. I've been doing online banking since 1997 and web-based online banking since 1999. My banks have mobile interfaces for their services that are easy to use for common banking functions. I have no complaints. If your bank doesn't have a decent mobile interface, well, get a new bank.

As for payment by Cell Phone, I really don't feel the need. I'm also not that enthusiastic about RFID based cards.
Reply to this comment
by inachu September 26, 2008 9:31 AM PDT
Where is my Coca Cola cellular enable phone?
I want to buy a coke with my cell phone!
Reply to this comment
by TV James September 26, 2008 10:09 AM PDT
Yeah, why should I hunt and peck on a cell phone when I can sign-in from home or work or any place that offers WiFi and do my banking?

Now, phone based payments... that's what I'm looking for.

I think the only phone-based banking I'd want to do is take my Mobil Speedpass and and SuperGlue it to the side of my phone. I cannot understand why Mobil hasn't made this technology available everywhere. There are no Mobil stations around here so the thing languishes in my fireproof box at home, but if the swipe and enter-a-password technology were available, I could lighten up my wallet with an RFID in my phone.
Reply to this comment
by iPhoneUser September 26, 2008 12:34 PM PDT
None of this matters until the banking and credit industry makes transactions appear instantaneously on your account. Nowadays, if I buy something with a credit card on Friday, it won't show up on my account until the following week on Tuesday or Wednesday. Improve the infrastructure first, then start expanding. Paying by cell phone would sweet and I'd love that functionality, but chances are it'll be like cvaldes1831 said and ATT will work at Best Buy, but won't work at Circuit City where Sprint will work, etc. I hope it doesn't get to that point, but knowing our country's desire to wrap everything heavily in red tape, it probably will.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan September 26, 2008 2:17 PM PDT
You've got a point. The bank sure knows the moment I make any purchase as my balance goes down immediately, even though the transaction doesn't show up in my account record for several days after the merchant has filed their receipts. Seems to me that they could give you an instant balance online since they have the data, and even list the transactions you have made with whomever instantly as well, but put in a (PENDING) to indicate that the sale is not final / recorded until the bank receives the info from the merchant.

Waiting for your transactions to clear in today's electronic society is so very 1970's.
by cyberbian September 27, 2008 7:21 PM PDT
Just what I need!

One stop shopping for identity theft, and a credit card with the added feature of a battery which goes dead. So no I can get stranded on the road with a dead cellphone and no way to pay to get home, or even buy a new battery! Genius!

Don't call us, we'll call you!
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 September 28, 2008 5:41 PM PDT
Nobody is proposing a cellphone-only payment system. Use cash, credit cards, debit cards, travelers cheques, Monopoly money, whatever. Like I said, the Japanese are already doing this.

The fact of the matter is that in surveys, people have said that if they can have only one thing when they left their home between cellphone, keys, and wallet, they'd take the cellphone.
by strykernyc September 28, 2008 5:42 PM PDT
You can access any any ANY banking website from any any WINDOWS MOBILE DEVICE USING IE OR OPERA AND SOME OTHERS. I have been banking from my WINDOWS MOBILES FOR YRS.
Reply to this comment
by Douglas Worlund September 28, 2008 6:12 PM PDT
Are there even any banks still in business?
Reply to this comment
by FreddieT September 29, 2008 3:23 AM PDT
I second strykernyc. I can access the standard Wells Fargo online banking site via Mobile Safari on my iPhone. Why bother to sign up for "Mobile Banking"?
Reply to this comment
by s_more September 30, 2008 6:48 AM PDT
The only way mobile banking will work is when consumers have choice and there is competition. Also, a standardized process is needed for payments regardless of what bank or phone company you are with or want to switch to... the banks use standardized processes for ATMs, credit cards, etc.. and the phone companies use standardized processes for SMS and other phone services.

When confusion prevails people do not use the technology.. that is why apple and windows based products work well... people can see what they need to do and it is easy to use. Too many links and layers is not going to work.

Mobile banking is another channel that most everyone can use with so many mobiles out there. Who thought they needed a cellphone and now, millions have them. Who thought ATMs would catch on and that we would pay for transaction? There is no doubt that mobile banking is here and will only get better.
Reply to this comment
by TadasJ November 12, 2008 6:14 AM PST
Currently Bank of America and Citibank are in the forefront of offering cellular access to your bank accounts. Here is a link about research that has been done about mobile banking - http://www.mybanktracker.com/articles/2008/10/21/banking-goes-mobile-despite-concerns-on-security/
Reply to this comment
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right