July 22, 2008 8:50 AM PDT

Are Google Maps good or evil?

Pop quiz: do you feel more or less secure with the arrival of Google Maps and other online mapping services?

News.com Poll

Are Google Maps scary?
Google Maps can show child predators where children play--but also help honest citizens find felons. How do online maps make you feel?

More secure
Less secure
Neither
Both



View results

I ran into that question when I got two very different news releases Monday. One argued that Google Maps helps awful people find you, but the other argued Google Maps helps you find awful people.

The first was from an outfit called Stop Child Predators, which launched a campaign to tell parents about the potential ills of Google Maps' Street View, which shows driver's-eye views of countless neighborhoods.

"This technology shows anyone in the world our communities, and exposes not only the routes from the bus stops to homes, but our children, without ever stepping foot in our neighborhoods," said Stacie Rumenap, the executive director of Stop Child Predators, in a statement.

On the other side was the announcement of CriminalSearches.com, a new service from PeopleFinders.com that said it shows where "sex offenders...thieves, violent offenders, murderers, or con artists" live in your neighborhood. The site shows people icons on a Google map; clicking an icon shows a person's photo, description, address, and criminal history.

"In a society where personal safety has become an important concern, CriminalSearches.com provides useful information that will help families feel secure in their neighborhoods and personal lives," PeopleFinders.com said, with President Bryce Lane adding, "We created CriminalSearches.com to help consumers make the most educated decisions about the people they let into their personal lives and the lives of their loved ones."

So what's the verdict? Do online maps creep you out? Or do you feel safer because they enable you to keep an eye out for threats?

Vote in the poll, and share your thoughts in the feedback section below.

PeopleFinders.com said its CriminalSearches.com site lets you scope neighborhoods for people with a criminal history.

PeopleFinders.com said its CriminalSearches.com site lets you scope neighborhoods for people with a criminal history.

(Credit: CriminalSearches.com)

Recent posts from News - Digital Media
At 10 years old, whither Google?
Mozilla releases second Firefox 3.1 alpha
Google forms OpenSocial Foundation to woo friends
Week in review: Google's Chrome shines
About time: Joost to launch browser-based player
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 58 comments (Showing first 20 comments)
by LivelyMapper July 22, 2008 9:25 AM PDT
I think Google Maps bring a lot of value to the world. The more information we have at our fingertips, the better our quality of life. As for Google Street View and privacy concerns, if I go down the street, take some pictures and post them on http://www.flickr.com or http://streetviewgallery.corank.com, how is this ant different than Google Street View?
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by udamdirtyape July 22, 2008 9:25 AM PDT
Just more of the climate of fear that we are supposed to be immersed in... Instead of fearing your neighbors, or fearing that your evil criminal neighbors will find you, why dont you get to know them...
Reply to this comment View reply
by LivelyMapper July 22, 2008 9:26 AM PDT
I think Google Maps bring a lot of value to the world. The more information we have at our fingertips, the better our quality of life. (Editors' note: Ad links have been removed.)
Reply to this comment
by mstrhypno July 22, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
Given how many times I have tried to USE Google Maps and beel led in the WRONG direction BY the app, I'd have to opt for "bad," simply from a useability standpoint, if nothing else.

Of course, the street view's "peeping tom" factor also adds to my opinion by more than a little as well....
Reply to this comment View reply
by Vic49 July 22, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
I am not using Gmail as my primary email because I value my privacy. Gmail scans (reads) your emails and collects information on you to target ads among other things. Judging from their cozy relationship with the government and "whomever," it would be quick and simple for Google to provide the information to the government and other parties. They have done this before, and remember Google saves everything. Google's mission statement is to organize information -- including information on you.
Reply to this comment
by Tsee July 22, 2008 9:58 AM PDT
Hysteria like this is getting way out of hand. We should be more concerned about real threats like the legalization of unconstitutional wiretaps and the recent 4th Court ruling that took away habeas corpus. I mean, is there even a case of someone using satellite maps the way these people are alleging? Can't they just drive around the neighborhood? Compare that to the millions and millions that use them for innocent purposes. Come on, will I start reading about the evils that are camcorders because, I don't know, some abusers use them?
Reply to this comment
by budeverett July 22, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
Google maps, especially with the satellite images and the street view, are a great help and benefit to me. I have to move and I've been using the maps with satellite images to check out the neighborhoods and cities. I get a bird's eye view of what a neighborhood looks like, including what stores and businesses are nearby and the size of yards and if there are many trees. When I have the address of a house or apartment I am interested in,I use the street view. I can find what the street and the house or building looks like. I can do all this without traveling long distances. Google maps are saving me time and money.

Everything on the Internet has its bad and good uses. If the Internet starts to be censored bit-by-bit or parts of it gradually banned, then there won't be much useful things left. ISP's are banning all alt newsgroups because a small percentage has child porn. P2P services may be banned because some people download copyrighted material. People want to put restrictions on Facebook and Myspace because of privacy issues. Instead of gradually doing it piece-by-oiece, whay not just ban the entire Internet?
Reply to this comment
by usualsuspect87 July 22, 2008 10:04 AM PDT
If you've reached a level of paranoia that google maps can affect your feelings on safety in either direction, its time to move. I suggest Detroit or Flint.

On the other hand, i think we should burn all road atli (atlas plural?) and phone books. These have been plaguing our society for far too long.
Reply to this comment
by professionaladventurer July 22, 2008 10:09 AM PDT
People have to accept that in this world, any information "out there" about them can get put together with like and mapped by Google or who ever and published. It's out and not going back into the bag. In this "public" world I assume that everything I do can be found. I am prepared to face anything uncovered about me. It's easy to forget that these systems are filled with errors, since it's all parsed from other sources, there is no quality control standard and it easy to look at a map and go "OH MY GOD I AM SURROUNDED BY......." Turns out the data is out dated and the witch's coven has moved on.
Reply to this comment
by wigmo July 22, 2008 10:14 AM PDT
I think google maps is great, especially for easter eggs. If you have your map zoomed in on the Cleveland Area and search for "dimwit" you get the location for "The National Assembly to End the Iraq War". As recent as last week I could search for "shmuck" and get the Campaign re-election office for Dennis Kucinich. A search for "Wankers" pulls up Budget rent-a-car. It's pretty funny, especially if google maps search is tied directly into it's own search results.
Reply to this comment View reply
by punterjoe July 22, 2008 10:46 AM PDT
As in so many instances, the tool is neutral. It's what the user does with it that is the real issue. Taken to extremes, you can look at nearly any advance our species has made since stepping from the primordial ooze and make a case why it's "evil" and we'd be better off without it. I'm all for empowering people with better tools, if they choose to put them to bad ends, they invited whatever retribution society takes on them. Does that make me a draconian libertarian? :)
Reply to this comment
by jamalystic July 22, 2008 10:49 AM PDT
People will always try to misuse even the very good things of life and google maps are no exception. We should not allow child predators to define what is acceptable for society. Google maps is a wonderful tool and to the many of us that have get direction to places, it is very useful. Even when the U.S. military bans google maps, i think it is a step in the wrong direction: US Military Bans Google Maps(http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=466&doc_id=147875&F_src=flftwo)
Reply to this comment
by Dleon84 July 22, 2008 11:16 AM PDT
This is a RIDICULOUS article for the following reasons: PATRIOT ACT, EXTREME RENDITION and unwarranted WIRE-TAPPING! You're so concerned about information then maybe you should write an article on how the government is currently stalking its citizens. Get a life and write about something that is worthy of print or publication.
Reply to this comment
by Pete Bardo July 22, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
I'm more scared by folks like Stop Child Predators and CriminalSearches.com than I am ov Google maps, street view, etc. Not only is our government stalking us, they are encouraging all of us to watch our neighbors and report anything out-of-the-ordinary. They are fragmenting our neighborhoods and, thereby, our culture. It's time we stopped spying on each other and begin helping one another in our pursuit of hippiness.
Reply to this comment View reply
by Pixelslave July 22, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
This good or bad debate is so superficial. Instead of a simple good vs bad discussion, why can't CNet thinks deeper -- Will Google Maps encourage segregation? People may want to choose to live in an area where the neighbors share their political view, social status, religion, races, etc. Yes, people used to do that, too. But with all those location based info, we can be a lot more precise now and words can be spread much quicker. Will this lead to more conflicts among groups of different thoughts, races, or classes?
Reply to this comment
by bsarte July 22, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
I'm sorry, I am a parent and a good citizen and all that.. but there is no reason that you should be able to go on the Internet and find out where criminals live. Isn't that the point of our criminal justice system (no matter how flawed it is)? You serve your time and can go on to live a semi-normal life? If we, as a society, truly believe that child predators cannot be reformed then they should get life sentencs... period.
Reply to this comment View reply
by bsarte July 22, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
I'm sorry, I am a parent and a good citizen and all that.. but there is no reason that you should be able to go on the Internet and find out where criminals live. Isn't that the point of our criminal justice system (no matter how flawed it is)? You serve your time and can go on to live a semi-normal life? If we, as a society, truly believe that child predators cannot be reformed then they should get life sentencs... period.
Reply to this comment
by Al57 July 22, 2008 11:50 AM PDT
Google Maps and the other mapping systems are just exposing the massive (negative) societal changes happening because of the Liberals teaching that nasty "tolerance."

We're all supposed to "tolerate" bad behavior. It's to the point where you can't say anything. So what do people do? They avoid places and other people. People are just finding ways to help people avoid other people.

This "tolerance" short-circuits our ability as a culture to grow. The way it is supposed to work is society grows with new people and their ideas/traditions, BUT, we filter out the ideas/traditions that don't fit. (It's called the melting pot.)

This goofy "tolerance" screws this up.

We as a culture tend to like spaghtetti but we don't like the Mafia. In Liberalland, we're not supposed to say anything about the Mafia because we would be judging them and that's a big no-no to Liberals.

In the media, you can see this in action when someone does open their mouth, the crime (or whatever) is immediately forgotten and the story turns into how the Mafia or gang, etc. is really a victim. (For Liberals, everyone is either a victim or a villain. Victims need Liberal help (programs) and villains need to torn down. Depending on the subject everyone is a victim or villain at various times with these people.)

Over the past few decades, we've taught kids this and now we're seeing the effects. Gangs and all sorts of bad behaviors are growing and we can't do anything about it. The police are being neutered because they get sued for trying to prevent crime.

The police learn very quickly that without public support, they're just there to try to find people who very clearly break some law and only after-the-fact. Outfits like the ACLU are ready to pounce on anyone who attempts to disparage "victims" - gangs for example.

People have to take things into their own hands because of the societal breakdown caused by Liberals. So tools based on maps that help people are justa a way to help avoid people and places. Sad but true.

If you want to learn more about the Liberal philosophy, watch the video "HOW MODERN LIBERALS THINK" on YouTube. You'll need some quiet time. Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c
Reply to this comment View reply
by Penguinisto July 22, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
Sorry, Stephen... but no joy. It's a commonality between criminal (or cop) and any information-finding service: post-industrialization allows one person to find another under most circumstances.

Unless you decide to move to, say, Mongolia or Siberia, and never speak with another human soul ever again...? Well, welcome to our interconnected society.
Reply to this comment
by rmcourtney July 22, 2008 12:17 PM PDT
Well, I do wonder one thing about criminal searches. Suppose I wind up on this list.... and suppose I am totally innocent. What does it take to get off the list? My problem with these lists is the validity of the information and confusion for the person who it targets. I personally think law enforcement should keep the lists, not a company who may not have your interest in mind. You know.... $$$$$$
Reply to this comment View reply
 See all 58 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

About News - Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News - Digital Media topics

Featured blogs

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • News - Business Tech

    Chrome's JavaScript challenge to Silverlight

    The advent of Google's Chrome browser, software pros say, should spur a big speedup for JavaScript, which would raise its standing against Microsoft's Silverlight technology.

  • Gallery

    Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week

    Here are CNET Reviews' 10 favorite items from the past week, including the TiVo HD XL, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50, and the Dish Network's newest digital TV converter box.

  • News - Apple

    Apple watchers spot 'iPod Nano' pix, iTunes hints

    The rumor mill has long been predicting a longer, leaner new version of the iPod Nano, and now it's conjuring up some pictures.

  • Outside the Lines

    EIC Squared: Chrome, iPods, and a Dell-Salesforce union

    On this week's EIC Squared podcast CNET's Dan Farber and ZDNet's Larry Dignan discuss Google's latest rocket launch--the Chrome browser--as well as Apple's iPod event next week and a Dell-Salesforce.com union.

  • Video

    Katie Couric reflects on first Webcast

    The political conventions are over and so are CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric's first series of Webcasts. CNET's Kara Tsuboi sat down with Couric on the final night of the Republican National Convention to discuss what she liked about Webcasting, some of her most memorable guests, and whether TV news will still be around by the next round of conventions.

  • News - Digital Media

    At 10 years old, whither Google?

    Daniel Sieberg of CBS News looks at how the company grew exponentially from start-up to superstar and part of our culture, but what's ahead?

  • Video

    YouTube plays party politics

    During the presidential campaigning four years ago, YouTube didn't even exist. Now it's a tool candidates must master to get their message across. CNET's Kara Tsuboi stops by the YouTube upload booths at the Democratic and Republican conventions to find out why Google's video site has such a big presence in Denver and St. Paul, Minn.

  • News - Gaming and Culture

    Are Demo and TechCrunch50 fragmenting their audiences?

    With both events scheduled to start Monday, many press, as well as venture capitalists and others are having to choose which one to attend.

  • News - Cutting Edge

    Execs predict next Google-like tech

    On eve of company's 10-year anniversary, researchers and business pundits speculate about what technologies might someday have as much impact as Google.

  • Gallery

    Images: The art of 'Spore' prototypes

    Will Wright and his Maxis team worked on dozens of prototypes to test the elements of their soon-to-be-released evolution game. Here's a sampling.

  • Webware

    Mozilla releases second Firefox 3.1 alpha

    Added features include support for a new video tag element introduced with the HTML 5 standard, along with some speed enhancements.

  • Green Tech

    Duke Energy to invest in mini solar power plants

    Can hundreds of rooftop solar panels collectively operate like a central power plant? Duke Energy launches $100 million distributed solar program to find out.