Speaking separately at TechCrunch's Disrupt conference in San Francisco, both men reflected on the fact that today is September 11, and that one of the proposed outcomes of such snooping is greater safety. The question, of course, was sparked by leaks about the National Security Agency's surveillance program earlier this summer by former agency contractor Eric Snowden. Since then, other details have come to light about the agencies tactics, like the NSA's allegedly searching Americans' phone records, in violation of court requirements.
Doerr, a partner in the venture firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, said that he became resigned to the fact that he was being tracked from the very moment he got a credit card. "I'm comfortable with people knowing the 'to' and 'from' of my emails, with proper safeguards," he said.
"I'm obviously concerned with government snooping," Khosla said. "But between having no snooping and having snooping, I agree with the government programs."
"The fact is, we know about the NSA," he continued. "We don't know what other governments are doing. But, almost certainly, other governments are doing this."
Asked why it was necessary to give up certain freedoms, Khosla said, "we have to be pragmatic."
Of course, as luminaries in Silicon Valley, an industry that runs on the extrapolation and use of data -- and whose major players like Google and Facebook have already complied with the NSA -- Doerr's and Khosla's answers are perhaps not surprising. Indeed, tech entrepreneur Max Levchin, who also spoke at the conference, said many of the same things as Doerr and Khosla when he was asked the NSA question.