• On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
November 14, 2009 6:05 PM PST

Apple relents on Mad artist's caricature app

by Natalie Weinstein
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 37 comments
Share

The app features every member of Congress, including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

(Credit: Screenshot by Natalie Weinstein)

Apple's App Store has given a nod to an application that features bobble-headed caricatures of congressional politicians and provides contact information.

"Apple came to its senses yesterday and approved the app," Mad Magazine artist Tom Richmond wrote in his blog Saturday. "You have to wonder how much of the decision was based on the press [coverage] and image hit Apple had taken, and how much of it was simply that some overworked approval person rubber stamped it as a reject."

The Bobble Rep-111th Congress Edition app caught the public's attention this week after Richmond wrote a blog about the rejection and quoted from Apple's letter. The letter stated that the app violated the developer license agreement because it "contains content that ridicules public figures," according to Richmond's earlier post.

Apparently, someone at Apple didn't think it was particularly funny to see Richmond's 540 caricatured heads, which bobble around when an iPhone is shaken.

Richmond had called Apple's decision "truly ridiculous" and had written that the "caricatures aren't mean or very exaggerated."

The app costs 99 cents, which comes out to about one-fifth of a cent per politician.

(By the way, the 540 politicians includes the 100 senators, 435 representatives, and five nonvoting delegates.)

Natalie Weinstein is an associate editor who works out of Austin, Texas. She spent a decade as a reporter and editor in the newspaper industry before joining the CNET News staff in 2000. E-mail Natalie.
Recent posts from Digital Media
MIT wins DARPA balloon challenge
On2 answers questions on Google merger
Study: Facebook users willingly give out data
Yahoo adds privacy tool, in time for FTC meetings
I want my Vevo: Will video site be next-gen MTV?
Facebook forms safety advisory board
Apple confirms acquisition of music site Lala
Amazon to open bricks-and-mortar stores?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (37 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by MyRightEye November 14, 2009 6:23 PM PST
Would have been some stupid left wing ultra-lib that couldn't handle seeing their beloved Pelosi as a wobble head.

And don't come back with some right wing nonsense, I am not a Republican.
Reply to this comment
by guest18934367 November 14, 2009 6:38 PM PST
So then what, you're just a troll?
by ChiEyes November 14, 2009 6:40 PM PST
Well, you don't have to be a Republican to be a right winger. But with the "stupid left wing ultra-lib" it certainly seems like you are some kind of stupid right wing ultra-idiot.

Most likely, the original reviewer of the app probably was some youngster who does not understand what caricature is. It is not like it is a popular form these days. Many times when you do see it, it is poorly done. However, what I have seen of these, they are quite well done.
by chipotlecoyote November 14, 2009 8:36 PM PST
It's caricatures of every senator and representative, dude. Pelosi's just happens to be the one that CNET used as an illustration here. How do you know it wasn't a stupid right wing ultra-con who couldn't stand seeing John Boehner or Mitch McConnell as a bobblehead? A paleo-libertarian incensed somebody would dare draw a caricature of Ron Paul?
by Yelonde November 15, 2009 9:28 AM PST
You may not be a republican, but "Would have been some stupid left wing ultra-lib" sounds like something only Sean Hannity would say. Whether you are a republican or not, it makes you sound like someone with a limited education.
by b_baggins November 16, 2009 7:58 AM PST
@chip

Because conservatives don't have a demonstrated history of trying to shut down dissent. I don't recall Bush ever calling for the boycott of a news organization because he didn't like it. And I don't recall conservative groups beating black people up while shouting racial epithets at them during peaceful protests. And I don't recall the Republican speaker of the house ever calling a group of peaceful protesters nazis.

Oh, and just in case you get your news from CNN, here are the specifics:

Obama: called for the boycott of Fox News.
Union thugs physically assaulted a black conservative at a tea party while shouting racial epithets at him
Nancy Pelosi called tea party protesters people carrying swastikas.

So, based on historical fact, it is much more likely a liberal wanted to censor the caricatures than a conservative would.
by DragonJoeSmith November 16, 2009 8:55 AM PST
@b_bagins - I recall conservatives were the main force behind Alabama lynchings to maintain the ways of segregation. I would consider that a very violent and fear-mongering response to liberal ideas. I do recall main conservative figures calling out against an Olympic bid because a liberal president wanted to bring in millions of outside dollars into the USA, possibly not even during his term.
No, sir. Ultra politics is not limited to the liberal or conservative side. It is the self-righteous and close minded, which are found in great abundance on the fringes of both sides of the bird.
by jjolsen November 16, 2009 9:17 AM PST
OK, so we've established that there are too many dim-wits on both the left and the right. Now everybody kiss and make up. It's not the [right/left] that's the problem. It's the fact that there are only two viable parties.
by xcopy November 18, 2009 6:29 AM PST
@MyRightEye

Not a republican?

Well, you are an idiot so seriously, what's the difference?

Republican, Right winger, idiot, etc. To corrupt Shakespeare, ignorant swine by any other name would smell as bad...
by Ramon366 November 14, 2009 7:05 PM PST
American politicos have grown to believe that they're members of the second estate; good for Tom Richmond to remind them that they can and will be caricatured and ridiculed if necessary.
If you want your nation back, buy this app and contact them whenever they need a reality check.
Reply to this comment
by jaguar717 November 15, 2009 4:33 PM PST
Agreed. Nancy Pelosi and Bawney Fwank and their ilk are pushing for a caste system. A ton of peons with no hope of moving up in life, dependent on handouts from the Anointed royalty.

Now more than ever they need to be ridiculed, questioned, and laughed off their high horses.
I hope he expands the app to all the shady Chicago thugs & Czars next. Then maybe people will start realizing the Emperor has no clothes.
by baconstang November 14, 2009 8:45 PM PST
Aren't caricatures supposed to look at least a little bit like the person?
Reply to this comment
by pcweenies November 15, 2009 5:22 AM PST
Tom Richmond is one of the best caricaturists out there.
by fshea November 14, 2009 9:52 PM PST
Apple's App store review policy is completely broken.

Developers. Why would you develop for Apple when you have 20 Android Phone's to develop for that will not get rejected?

Do the math.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan November 14, 2009 10:33 PM PST
It's a great example of why the Apps Store is broken.

A simulator to shake infants until they die of physical abuse? Passed without any issue.

A contact list to contact your government representatives? Banned.

They waffled on both and reversed their decisions, but only after the media took them to task for it. If nobody had raised the alarm, then Apple woudn't have changed anything.

Thankfully we can still buy as many flashlight and tip calculator apps as we need!
by veggiedude--2008 November 15, 2009 6:44 AM PST
"Developers. Why would you develop for Apple when you have 20 Android Phone's to develop for that will not get rejected?"


Because Apple iPhone developers have ben able to rake in $1000's per week. One Android developer with a top ten app complained he barely makes $60 per week. You do the math!
by Kiljoy616 November 15, 2009 8:42 AM PST
Is the apps store broken or just the people they put to do the job, inquiring minds wonder.
by superaznman November 15, 2009 3:36 PM PST
app makers hardly make money, whether with the iphone or android. most of the time they are barely able to break even with production costs, unless they make a very popular app... but even then they dont make that much money...
by David Turner November 15, 2009 11:45 PM PST
Because with Android you have a much smaller user base so less money to be made. Also how many versions or Android are their now??? It's a market that is going / become fragmented. Different phones with different OS with different power levels....Developers don't want to deal with this unless the numbers are big enough to make it worth the investment. Despite what any fanboy will tell you currently it's not.
by ozoneocean November 14, 2009 9:53 PM PST
If an artist has done those images specifically for this application, I hope they got paid properly. That's a lot of work- a lot more than what's involved in coding the thing or even collating that information. At 99 cents I wonder if this is really cost effective for the creators, or did they steel the images?
Reply to this comment
by Deekman November 14, 2009 11:01 PM PST
The developer drew the caricatures. From the original story: "Rather than use the politicians' individual portraits, the app depicts each senator and representative in caricature form, which Richmond drew himself."
by Deekman November 14, 2009 10:58 PM PST
THAT's supposed to be Pelosi? Okay, now I find it offensive. To my artistic notions, that is.
Reply to this comment
by tipoo_ November 15, 2009 6:34 AM PST
That facebook guy had it right...Apple shouldnt be able to reject apps, beyond ones that are unstable or pose a security risk. We can decide what we want on our devices on our own, thanks.
Reply to this comment
by iPhoneUser November 15, 2009 7:27 AM PST
"Developers. Why would you develop for Apple when you have 20 Android Phone's to develop for that will not get rejected?

Do the math."

10,000 Android Apps vs. 100,000 iPhone Apps...you do the math on which base has more customers.
Reply to this comment
by tech_crazy November 15, 2009 9:31 PM PST
The no. of apps cannot convey the size base (no. of downloads and/or customers) of the apps, the 2 are independent quantities. I am not saying that this is the case, but just as an example an average iPhone app could have 10 downloads each and an average Android app could have a 1000. Thus the total iphone app downloads would be 1M while the Android would be 10M. Hope you get the point.
by nuniobydnis November 17, 2009 6:48 AM PST
I was going to point out the number of apps doesn't say anything about the user base but somebody beat me to it. The amount of time both systems have been available should not be overlooked . Android has been available for what, a year? How many apps were available for iPhone at that stage?

That said, I would not expect Android apps to sell as well this early in the game simply because iPhone users have a consumerist mindset.

Gotta love that "McDonalds is the epitome of fine dining because $Fancy_Restaurant hasn't sold billions and billions of burgers" logic.
by ahypnoz1 November 15, 2009 7:47 AM PST
The app store is not broken. you have a built in payment system, anti fraud system and best of all, a system that has millions of smart phone buyers. Even John Carmack via id Software is so positive about the iPhone platform, they are winding down their development of BREW/Java mobile games for other mobile phones in favor of focusing on the App Store. id Software recently ported Doom to the iPhone and has plans on bringing the entire Quake franchise as well as an original Rage-based game to the App Store. In fact I think apple rejects apps just for the free press advertising.

If you are a programmer the android is kool. It is like a "hot rod" super fast, you can do anything you want and not have to go through the iPhone police. But the problem is for all its good features the android is for hobbiest. My mom or dad would never use it because it is too complicated.
Reply to this comment
by sgoodell07 November 15, 2009 8:35 AM PST
I am sorry that your parents are too dim-witted to use what I would consider to be a fairly easy device.
by Proud_Geek November 15, 2009 9:58 PM PST
@ sgoodell07

Really? Did you REALLY have to go there?
by Kiljoy616 November 15, 2009 8:40 AM PST
Nothing short of a lawsuit is going to change this ridiculous way of approving apps. And kudos to the person who made the app, just what I was looking for.
Reply to this comment
by ralphmcmac November 15, 2009 11:10 AM PST
Yep. I agree that the process of rejection was riddiculous. I'm glad it's been overturned. I hope Theres a similiar app for our rather dodgy members of parliament in the app store by MAD.

Apple you need to re-review your app review process I don't like opportunists trying to kick the tar out of my favourite tech company. As I said before you're embarrassing me with silly stories like this one.
Reply to this comment
by ralphmcmac November 15, 2009 11:26 AM PST
? Firstly I love the fact the iPhone is policed. Although there are an awful lot of the same Apps I like the fact that they are checked albeit the process is calamatous at times. I'm sure Apple will succeed in fixing this.

? I would be concerned about a developer doing anything they want. Also a concern are those who want to do anything they want without fully understanding the implications. Jail broken iPhones and those who own them are a classic example.
Reply to this comment
by David Turner November 15, 2009 11:48 PM PST
Why the concern about developers ??

On your mac or pc developers can do anything they want? Does that scare you as well?
by censorshipblows November 15, 2009 1:35 PM PST
Cnet, the new black bar at the bottom of your site is annoying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by odeleon November 16, 2009 10:26 AM PST
Yes, completely annoying....it's looks like you reached the end of the page
by opiapr November 15, 2009 1:42 PM PST
The rejection of this app make no sense.
Reply to this comment
by datamuncher November 16, 2009 12:29 PM PST
Hey guy,

Just to keep it simple for the stupid among us. There were complaints - the issues that caused were fixed..
* Seems like the Apps Store is working OK with the help of a healthy press
* Bought the app - there are bobbleheaded caricatures on both sides of the aisle and I've heard vehement complaints from far-winger conservatives and liberals - pretty balanced.
* Let's not seek out conspiracies or favoritism unless you really are a fringe element, in which case go at it and get marked as such.
Reply to this comment
(37 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right