Comcast earnings climb 22 percent
Helped by cost cuts and by growth in Internet and phone subscribers, Comcast on Wednesday reported a 22 percent jump in earnings for its third quarter.
The cable provider saw net income of $944 million, or 33 cents per share, for the quarter ended Sept. 30, compared with $771 million (26 cents per share) in the year-ago quarter. Sales also rose, hitting $8.8 billion, up from $8.5 billion in 2008's third quarter, though revenue was slightly below analysts' estimates.
For the quarter, the number of TV subscribers dropped 2.7 percent to 23.7 million from 24.4 million a year ago. But the loss was more than offset by gains in Internet and voice, two services that Comcast has marketed heavily, especially as part of its Triple-Play service.
The number of Internet subscribers rose 6.4 percent to 15.6 million, while Comcast phone customers jumped 20 percent to 7.3 million. Overall, the company saw a quarterly increase in customers of 3.4 percent to 46.8 million. Subscriber growth helped boost third-quarter sales for the cable segment by 2.8 percent to $8.4 billion.
With a focus on trimming costs, capital expenses declined 6.1 percent to $1.2 billion, due in large part to lower spending at the company's cable divison.
"The strength and resilience of our businesses combined with our continued emphasis on expenses and prudent capital management helped us achieve healthy operating and financial results in the third quarter," Brian Roberts, chairman and chief executive officer, said in a statement.
Comcast revealed no new details over its intent to acquire a leading stake in GE-owned NBC Universal. Early last month, reports surfaced that the company wanted to buy a 51 percent chunk of NBCU, with GE owning the rest, to create a new joint venture. If it goes through, the deal could transform Comcast into a major media powerhouse, with control of NBC as well as variety of TV networks and cable stations.
Lance Whitney wears a few different technology hats--journalist, Web developer, and software trainer. He's a contributing editor for Microsoft TechNet Magazine and writes for other computer publications and Web sites. You can follow Lance on Twitter at @lancewhit. Lance is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and he is not an employee of CNET. 




In Tucson AZ, the only digital cable provider last I checked was Cox. Again if your in Tucson AZ or Yuma AZ or any other area of the country for satellite television you can choose between Dish or DirecTV.
Your lucky you got the choice of Fios TV.
No city has more than 1 cable provider and that's unfortunate. Instead of cable companies competing against each other we have cable in general competing against satellite or services like Fios now only for TV service. In Tucson AZ the cable provider last I checked was Cox. You can get satellite from Dish or DirecTV in Yuma or Tucson or anywhere else but if you live in Yuma you can only get Time Warner for cable, in Tucson only have Cox for cable -- you can't choose between Cox or Time Warner in any city.
I'm pretty disgusted with what they charge considering there are only perhaps 4 or 5 channels that I actually watch (and none of them are premium channels.)
Some co-workers trying to find ways to cut back have discovered they can cancel cable, just take over-of-the-air digital broadcasts for basic TV and then subscribe to season-passes of anything else they might actually care to watch via a service such as Apple TV. The cost of subscribing to an entire season of one show is substantially less than the cost of just 1 month of cable TV.
I'm behind a hill from the metropolitan area where the digital transmitters for over the air signals are so that's out too.
I'm paying $120 for basic cable TV and internet usage. Just five years ago I was paying only $50. Things change.
You're welcome.
- by metomjr December 1, 2009 9:28 AM PST
- Wouldn't surprise me. Just got a letter telling me they'd be increasing my rates again on Jan 1.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)Cable Monopoly.