• On TV.com: New TV sex symbol: Vintage black PORSCHE
August 19, 2009 7:13 AM PDT

CBS to run video ad in magazine this fall

by Caroline McCarthy
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 52 comments

NEW YORK--Broadcast network CBS will be advertising its fall TV season with a video-chip ad embedded in an issue of Entertainment Weekly.

The September 18 issue of the Time Inc.-owned magazine will feature the first video ad to appear in print, George Schweitzer, CBS marketing president, said Wednesday at a press conference at the company's headquarters here.

The ad with embedded video.

(Credit: Caroline McCarthy/CNET)

The ad will be launched in partnership with PepsiCo to promote Pepsi Max soda and the TV network's Monday prime-time lineup. Not everyone will be seeing it: the ad will appear in a magazine insert sent to subscribers in the New York and Los Angeles areas--an edition without the video chip will be sent to subscribers elsewhere and show up on newsstands.

The technology for the battery-powered ads was manufactured by a Los Angeles-based company called Americhip, and each ad can handle about 40 minutes of video.

Here are some more details about the Americhip technology: the screen, which is 2.7 millimeters thick, has a 320x240 resolution. The battery lasts for about 65 to 70 minutes, and can be recharged, believe it or not, with a mini USB cord--there's a jack on the back of it. The screen, which uses thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT LCD) technology, is enforced by protective polycarbonate. It's a product that has been in development at Americhip for about two years, spokesman Tim Clegg told CNET News via e-mail.

"It's leadership in innovation, which we really stress at CBS in every part of our company," Schweitzer said of the ads, which were developed with the collaboration of the Ignition Factory, a division of the Omnicom Group's OMD media agency.

PepsiCo has been experimenting with edgy, experimental ads for some time now, distributing millions of 3D glasses for its SoBe LifeWater Super Bowl ad earlier this year. It more recently launched a new Mountain Dew flavor by inviting prominent Twitter users to a party at a trendy Brooklyn venue.

Pepsi Max is the company's new diet soda geared toward men, advertised earlier this summer with bold print ads that declared, "Save the calories for bacon."

"The evolution of marketing television in the fall--it used to be as simple as this," Schweitzer said, holding up a vintage copy of TV Guide. "It was axiomatic in those days. If you took an ad in TV Guide, people watched your program. Not anymore."

Disclosure: CNET News is published by CBS Interactive, a unit of CBS.

This post was updated at 1:38 p.m. PT with more details about Americhip's technology.

Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Another (loud, fuzzy) peek at Wired's tablet edition
Can Facebook group change World Cup game result?
Techmeme Mobile launches for iPhone, Pre, Droid
Sony planning new online store
HDMI products to get meaningful labels
eBay sets Skype loose at $2.75 billion valuation
Facebook becomes third most popular video site
Twitter now asks, 'What's happening?'
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (52 Comments)
by bblande August 19, 2009 7:28 AM PDT
It'll never last....way too expensive to produce, especially in this economy.
Reply to this comment
by cosuna August 19, 2009 9:34 AM PDT
@bblande:

Hey. That's been said of all the new technologies that have come (and yep, some have gone).

"Nobody will like to hear actors talk". "If you want to see a movie, you'll go to the cinema". "You would want to watch a channel that just shows music."

Of course, only time will tell.
by davidwarren August 19, 2009 7:38 AM PDT
wait, what??? did I miss a few years of tech?
Reply to this comment
by sting7k August 19, 2009 7:41 AM PDT
What is this displayed on? Where are the tech details cnet? How does it work?
Reply to this comment
by contentcreator--2008 August 19, 2009 8:31 AM PDT
Exactly. Publishing a press release is nice, but please follow up with some research. Each one of these costs how much? And we can "re-purpose" it how?
by paul.saulnier August 19, 2009 9:41 AM PDT
Yeah, seriously CNET. Do you understand your readers at all? You didn't answer the questions I had in mind at all. Give us some tech details!

And why is it necessary to have a paragraph telling us about Pepsi Max? I don't care.
by celticbrewer August 19, 2009 12:36 PM PDT
Ditto. How about some specs?

OLED? That's the only thin, flexible, energy efficent display I can think of. But it's not exactly cheap. Though Pepsi does have money to burn.

CC08- I like your thinking. Let's hack this thing.
by yiang August 19, 2009 1:05 PM PDT
Yea, what the details? how does this thing work? How long? etc. Jeez, I swear the qaulity / research put into some of these articles on CNET is downright atrocious.
by chriswininger1 August 19, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
There is a better article in the Financial Times.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5cd04e14-8cf4-11de-a540-00144feabdc0.html

It doesn't give a ton of details but more than you get here. It says they will use a liquid crystal display (Standard LCD), and the cost is estimated at several dollars per copy. This is opposed to the 9 cents per copy for a full page color ad.

I am disappointed that it is just using an LCD. I'm not sure how cool that will look plus I was hoping for something more exciting like OLED or re-arrangeable print. It sounds pretty lame.

I think the reason these companies are missing their audience is not just due to people skipping the ads with digital recording devices or going to the Internet. It's because people are so inundated with advertising that we've just tuned it out. We've gotten smarter. Even if this thing looks cool (I doubt it) people will look at it and say "Wow cool, but it's just Pepsi." Then they move on. There has a never been a way for marketers to directly show how that a given advertising campaign was successful. I suspect if you could show this you would see diminishing returns for existing brands. I don't think this will help CBS or Pepsi, but I sure would like to see one.
by ddhboy August 19, 2009 7:42 AM PDT
Ok, but whats the point in a world with the internet and portable devices like the iPhone and android cellphones? Given that people typically spend more time reading stuff on the internet than they do from magazines, it seems like a waste, and uses too many resources when you could simply rent out a spot on CNET.com and put up a little flash ad that would do the same thing for far less money and reach a wider audience.
Reply to this comment
by Bakkster August 19, 2009 8:06 AM PDT
I'm guessing the average Entertainment Weekly reader spends significantly less time online than the average CNet reader.

Sure it's more expensive, but it reaches a market that doesn't have a large online presence. Time will tell if the extra expense is sustainable.
by OmniDragon August 19, 2009 12:14 PM PDT
Because as big of a presence as CNET has online, I bet if I asked my parents and my siblings what CNETNEWS was, maybe one of them might know. If I asked them what Entertainment Weekly was, they would all chime in.

There's something else too. I've never seen a video inside a magazine before. I've heard audio in Hallmark cards before. I've seen holograms on baseball cards that change pictures when you move it in different directions. But, I've never seen a video inside a magazine. It kind of reminds me of something from Harry Potter. You know, when he opens up the photo album and all the images are moving in action? Sounds pretty interesting to me. Being something I've never seen before, it made me want to go out and buy the magazine right now.

Reaching a much wider audience? Just because you have a video ad placed on CNET, doesn't mean people are going to look at it and be interested. Many people out there aren't even going to see an ad you place on CNET because they use adblock in their browsers. Besides, how many pages of content are there on CNET? Thousands. Much easier to find an ad in a magazine than it would be to find a specific ad on CNET. And a video ad on a website isn't a new piece of technology. Who cares? There aren't any articles on CNET about "OMG there's a new VIDEO ad somewhere on the web". Hurray?
by gtdtm August 19, 2009 7:49 AM PDT
I can't really imagine people sitting there watching advertisements on a 1.5" screen (that's what it looks like in your picture anyway) that's planted in their magazine. People already get sick of trying to pass through the excessive amounts of printed ads in most magazines. How's a low quality tiny screen going to improve that?
Reply to this comment
by tomws August 19, 2009 9:45 AM PDT
I think you're ignoring the horde of text-message zombies who enjoy staring at 1.5" screens anyway. Consumers are like flies: attracted to shiny lights (or dung... take your pick).
by celticbrewer August 19, 2009 12:38 PM PDT
but it's new. They'll watch it. I'd watch it.

If there was one on every 10th page, or one in every magazine, of course people would stop watching.
by zarchon1 August 19, 2009 8:20 AM PDT
Personally I would love to get one of these. I would volunteer to watch the entire ad in order to get one.
Reply to this comment
by Sausagebiscuit August 19, 2009 8:20 AM PDT
I wonder if it will be on one of those annoying paper cards that when you open a magazine about 20 of them fall out. :)
Reply to this comment
by orbitas August 19, 2009 5:52 PM PDT
What if everyone collected those cards and dropped 'em in the mailbox, blank? Would the magazines that put them allover my floor have to pay postage for each return? Yeah!!! They'll stop soon enough! GO!
by Electro_Fox August 19, 2009 8:24 AM PDT
Hack hack! Chop chop! I can't wait to see how people pervert it's intended purpose... I'll keep an eye on HackaDay.com...
Reply to this comment
by nikola99 August 19, 2009 8:32 AM PDT
This is just for publicity and word of mouth advertisement ("Dude, you will never believe how cool this new ad for Pepsi is!"). Cool non the less.
Reply to this comment
by tektaktyks August 19, 2009 8:35 AM PDT
nice,i;d like business cards with this
Reply to this comment
by thesinglegirl August 23, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
As would I!!! That would be fab!
by lnxpro August 19, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
Yeah... but does it come with fries? :p
I guess i'll buy the magazine when it comes out, altough I never bought a entertainment weekly magazine before.

will keep my eye on hackaday.com for other purposes :)

cheers
Reply to this comment
by Zoobie August 20, 2009 4:26 PM PDT
Don't waste your money. Even if you subscribed today, and live in LA or NY, you still probably won't start receiving the subscription until after this ad runs.

"Not everyone will be seeing it: the ad will appear in a magazine insert sent to subscribers in the New York and Los Angeles areas--an edition without the video chip will be sent to subscribers elsewhere and show up on newsstands."
by PrescottGeek August 19, 2009 9:01 AM PDT
The article says "the ad will appear in a magazine insert sent to subscribers in the New York and Los Angeles areas" so you have to be a subscriber. I wonder if the magazine is giving them the ad space for free so that people purchase subscriptions. VERY CLEVER!!!
Reply to this comment
by krosafcheg August 19, 2009 9:17 AM PDT
Nice to see the rest of the country and the news stands subsidising NY and LA.

Looks like a last-ditch act of desperation.
Reply to this comment
by C.Schroeder August 19, 2009 9:33 AM PDT
I'm sorry, this looks like a tremendous waste of materials. How many households that receive this ad will pull out the insert and send it to the electronics recyclers? Right, most of them will end up in a land-fill. Has CBS filed an environmental impact statement for this?
Reply to this comment
by skyscraperjim August 19, 2009 9:53 AM PDT
Sadly the video chips will last far longer than the crummy TV shows it will promote. Its just more landfill fodder.
Reply to this comment
by ebmace August 19, 2009 10:12 AM PDT
And for those environmentally conscious readers who normally do recycle their magazines... these will inevitably pollute the recycling stream.
Reply to this comment
by one-off--2008 August 19, 2009 10:46 AM PDT
This is not news. The only reason this article was written was because cnet is now owned by CBS.
Reply to this comment
by celticbrewer August 19, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
Oh. Is that what they meant by "It's leadership in innovation, which we really stress at CBS in every part of our company"

Because i couldn't really think of anything innovative that CBS has ever done.

I guess with CNet as an asset, they can consider themselves slightly technological.
by shinelikeitdoes August 19, 2009 11:14 AM PDT
Mental. A huge well designed one page ad directing you to a URL would be far more effective, but unless they have some proprietary chip, thanks for the free thumb drive/SD card/whatever...
Reply to this comment
by SactoGuy018 August 19, 2009 11:53 AM PDT
It'll be interesting to see if this special video will become available online through a PepsiCo-owned website, though....
Reply to this comment
by August 19, 2009 12:27 PM PDT
Holy ****! This is the future! I love it!
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (52 Comments)
advertisement

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

Google has its own plan for Netbooks

No, the search giant isn't saying it will build a Netbook. But it sure knows what it would like one running Chrome OS to resemble, and that's a little different from the Netbook of today.
• Screenshot tour of Chrome OS

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right