June 24, 2009 9:21 AM PDT

Comcast and Time Warner team up to deliver TV online

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

Cable giant Comcast announced that it's working with media conglomerate Time Warner to deliver cable TV shows via the Internet for cable TV subscribers.

The companies announced on Wednesday that they will be testing a new service this summer offered by Comcast called On Demand Online. About 5,000 Comcast customers will be involved in the test. And they will get access to some of Time Warner's most popular TV shows from its TNT and TBS networks at no additional charge.

The companies plan to continue to work together to get more of Time Warner's Turner Broadcasting content on the Web for on-demand viewing, Jeff Bewkes, CEO of Time Warner, said during a press conference in New York on Wednesday.

The On Demand Online trial will test a new authentication technology that will allow secured access to the content.

Comcast's CEO Brian Roberts said he expects other networks to participate as the trial expands. Bewkes also said that Time Warner will work with other TV distributors, such as telephone companies and satellite companies, to distribute its video content in similar trials.

Comcast's plan is designed to provide TV networks and movie studios a secure way to distribute their movies and TV shows to a wider audience via the Internet. The way the service works is that people will only be able to access content if they have a cable TV subscription. But the service will work over any Internet provider, so that a Comcast TV subscriber could access video-on-demand services available through his paid TV package using Verizon's DSL service, for example.

Subscribers will only have access to content that is included in their cable package. For example, this means that viewers who pay for HBO could be allowed to get HBO shows and movies on demand via a broadband connection. But if a subscriber doesn't pay for HBO, that content won't be accessible via the service.

Comcast has already been experimenting with putting cable TV shows that haven't been available online on its Fancast Web site. And Time Warner Cable has also offered some HBO shows over the Internet in certain markets for a trial it's been testing.

Bewkes and Roberts emphasized during the press conference that the new service was about giving consumers free access to content via the Web. But journalists at the event and on the conference call pointed out that the service isn't really free since users must already subscribe to a paid TV service to get access to the content.

This is different from services such as Hulu.com, which is owned by NBC Universal and News Corp, and CBS' TV.com. (CNET News is published by CBS Interactive, a unit of CBS.) These Web sites offer broadcast TV shows via the Web for free after the shows have aired. Hulu even offers some cable TV shows.

But what Comcast and Time Warner are talking about is putting premium cable programming on the Web. Networks and movie studios have been reluctant to offer their content online because they fear piracy. They also have been uncertain about how to monetize their most valuable content.

But Roberts said that the authentication technology Comcast will use in its trial helps alleviate these fears because it not only authenticates using a username and password, but it goes one step further to ensure that the user accessing the content is really permitted to access that piece of content. And Bewkes said that new advertising models will be developed to help ensure that content owners get top dollar for their movies and TV shows.

Some critics view this move as a defensive one as cable operators and cable networks fear that as more content makes its way online--legally and otherwise--that many viewers will cut the cable cord and watch TV via the Internet. But Bewkes downplayed this concern saying that paid TV subscribership has increased every year for the last 30 years and that he doesn't see this trend slowing anytime soon.

Instead he said that this new initiative is really a way to give consumers more choice to watch what they want, when they want it and where they want regardless of device. While he concedes that most TV viewing is done today on an actual TV, he also said that viewers may want to watch TV shows on mobile phones. And this new model will allow for that as well.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from Digital Media
China arrests thousands in Web porn crackdown
When policemen are caught looking at Web porn
Time Warner Cable shows subscribers how to cut cord
Want to see Google's new phone on YouTube?
AT&T cuts Tiger Woods
Online holiday sales hit $27 billion
Amazon touts top products of 2009
Teen Muziic founder chastised by Vevo
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by divisionbyzero June 24, 2009 10:03 AM PDT
Why would I even bother with this when I can go to Hulu?

"But Bewkes downplayed this concern saying that paid TV subscribership has increased every year for the last 30 years and that he doesn't see this trend slowing anytime soon."

Well, as long as they keep the bit caps in place, he might be right. But this is typical spin. If I could get the quality of my cable subscription over the internet I'd drop cable in a heart beat.
Reply to this comment
by bababooeey June 24, 2009 10:05 AM PDT
Hmmm, lets see about this. My experiences with both companies in the last 2 years lead me to believe that this will flop like a lead balloon. Maybe their focus should be on bandwidth bottlenecks.
Reply to this comment
by gsigas June 24, 2009 10:37 AM PDT
This is fine in the short term, but in the long term both of these companies need to realize that their core business, just like the phone companies, will be as ISPs. Their existing business models will not last much longer and if they cannot adapt and transform themselves to fit the new market they will be replaced by new companies who can.
Reply to this comment
by w_2logan June 24, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
I don't understand why can't they set up a site like netflix for people who don't want a bunch of cable channels? The Cable or Studios can do it, They all own each other in someway! Why can't they have paid version of hulu? It seems to be working for netflix.
please let me know if I'm wrong?
Reply to this comment
by biffhenerson June 24, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
CBS should be streamed directly from CBS. Cut out all of the middle men. No need for Hulu or Comcast (other than their broadband). The network channels should offer direct feeds. Heck the "cable" channels could even charge a tiny fee. Want the Science Channel? $2.00 per month. Want NBC? its free with comercials. It would be the first time I would be able to get ONLY the channels I want. What do I want from Comcast? High quality, high reliability, high bandwidth ISP at a competitive price.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right