French 'three strikes' piracy law dealt setback
France's controversial attempt to crack down on Internet piracy was dealt a setback Wednesday when that country's highest legal authority struck down a provision that would have denied Internet access to those who repeatedly download copyrighted material illegally.
The French Constitutional Council rejected a key provision that would have given a newly created government agency the authority to cut off Internet access to those deemed to be copyright scofflaws after two warnings. The council said "free access to public communication services on line" was a human right that only a judge should have the power to disconnect.
The "three strikes" measure, which was approved in May by the French National Assembly with the support of French President Nicolas Sarkozy, would have punished digital pirates by suspending Internet service if they were caught illegally sharing copyrighted material. The legislation would have created a new government agency known as HADOPI (the Haute Autorité pour la Diffusion des Oeuvres et la Protection des droits sur Internet), which would have been tasked with sending notices to illegal file sharers.
Suspected offenders would have received two warnings about their illegal activities and on the third suspected offense, their Internet access would have been disconnected for anywhere from two months to a year. Users would also have been put on a blacklist preventing them from subscribing to another ISP.
Consumer and free speech advocates opposed the legislation, arguing that it would deny accused Internet pirates the right to challenge the government's charges in court. Opponents of the legislation also feared that it would pave the way for governments to violate its citizens' personal privacy rights.
The legislation, considered one of the most aggressive digital antipiracy regulations, proved to be quite controversial in France and throughout the world. As a pre-emptive measure, the European Parliament passed a measure prohibiting EU governments from terminating a user's Internet access without a court order.
The entertainment industry has for years lobbied for more active policing of the Internet, but France is one of the only countries to put together such stringent legislation. Other countries, such as the United Kingdom and the United States, instead are encouraging partnerships between ISPs and the entertainment industry to fight piracy.
At least one major ISP in the U.S., AT&T, has already agreed to work with the music industry by sending notices to consumers suspected of illegally distributing copyrighted content. And in the U.K., ISPs have agreed to help the entertainment industry fight piracy in lieu of new legislation.
Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers. E-mail Steven. 



I can't stop laughing each time these companies try to illegality file sharing. By suing the Pirate Bay they've shot themselves in the foot!
There is a moral lesson to be learned here... Don't make things worse.
industry shill/troll, the MAFIAA steals more than any "pirate" could DREAM to
Some would argue that is what movies and music are like already today. Those darn 'thrieves'.
People don't want to pay for anything, by definition. And some people think that if they can get away with stealing, then it's OK. (Being able to return a movie you're watched, possibly copied --- really, who can argue that makes sense with a straight face?)
I'm not arguing for or against copyright and other possible infringements, I am arguing for the openness of the internet and (so called) due process.
we told them
we were guilty without any trial
another point is a trojan from my own government on my pc (china install trojan on pc now....)
of course it's only windows compatible...i can't install it on my fedora , so if someone mac spoof my IP i can't proof it's not me
this trojan is not open source of course, so it can be upgraded with others things... stalline, and some other inglorious famous bastard, would have been happy with such a tool ;)
this trojan is based on a black/white list and no one knows what are criteria
why sarkozy want this law again and again?
his wife sings ! bad sure but she sings or try to
(sarkozy je te vois sale menteur ^^ : french sentence that can make me go to trial; translate if u wanna now; and it's true!!)
for my governemnt internet means terrorism , sexual abuses..
Just stop and think of all the things the internet provides people. News updates is the major thing, phones and other communications, school work, etc. It is very well becoming essential for humans to be able to access the internet in some form or another.
If my internet ever gets cut off (even just due to a technical difficulty), I'm screwed. lol
Boo Hoo
High Authority for the Distribution of Eggs and the Protection of Rights through the Internet???
I don't get it. What do eggs and internet rights have to do with each other?
"The HADOPI law is the nickname for a French bill officially titled "Projet de loi favorisant la diffusion et la protection de la création sur Internet"[1] or "bill of law favoring the diffusion and protection of creation on Internet", regulating and controlling the usage of Internet in order to enforce the compliance to the copyright law; "HADOPI" being the acronym for the government agency created by the eponymous bill."
it's not eggs xD
something like :
HIgh Authority for streaming/broadcasting/diffusion (?) of "artistic works" on Internet
- by pierregau October 27, 2009 8:15 AM PDT
- GROUPAMA was caught in a software PIRACY case of $200m and has made an unofficial affidavit (claiming that it was not guilty) to divert BEFTI investigators from the evidences officially collected one month ago at a different office.
- Reply to this comment
-
(27 Comments)In its affidavit, GROUPAMA argued that bank secrecy entitled it to limit the scope of Police investigations to a building that was not the place where evidences about the infraction were officially collected.
After the fraud was discovered and denounced by the victim, as GROUPAMA managed to have the General Prosecutor of Paris to state that Police was 'right' to ignore the criminal file and focus only on the irrelevant information provided by GROUPAMA itself, there is room for serious doubts in the way that affair was conducted.
As a matter of facts, FINAMA and GROUPAMA have reported false information to the markets regarding their own accounts (where the fraud describbed below has never been reported).
This unfortunate event is more than likely to compromize the confidence ratings of French (bank and insurance) regulated markets on the proven basis that the numbers cannot be trusted.
All the details, including the General Prosecutor reply, the BEFTI investigation file and the unofficial affidavit cooked by GROUPAMA have been made publicly available:
http://remoteanything.com/archives/groupama.pdf