• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
May 6, 2009 6:24 AM PDT

State AGs confront Craigslist over sex ads

by CBS Interactive staff

Three state attorneys general and representatives from six other states on Tuesday pressed lawyers from Craigslist to permanently remove the site's erotic services section.

Leading the charge at the closed meeting in Manhattan was Connecticut's top prosecutor, Richard Blumenthal, reports CBS News correspondent Kelly Wallace.

"No question, absolutely none, that here," Blumenthal said. "We're going after them to persuade them they ought to do the right thing, cooperate, and eliminate the ads."

South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster went further: Craigslist must remove all prostitution ads and pornography or Craigslist executives themselves will be prosecuted.

"It is nothing but filth," McMaster said. "It is advertisement for prostitution. It is ugly. It is harmful."

Can Craigslist be held criminally liable or sued for having illegal ads on its site? Not under current federal law, which grants immunity to sites like Craigslist for posting content it didn't create.

"Congress' rationale, which I think was a good one, that we want to not make illegal content legal or somehow inexcusable but place the onus on the people who are behaving badly in the first place," said Matt Zimmerman, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The pressure on the classified online ad site, which gets 30 million postings a month, has grown in recent weeks after medical student Philip Markoff was accused of robbing two women, and killing another, all of whom he met on Craigslist, and a New York radio reporter was killed by a teenager who allegedly responded to a Craigslist advertisement.

In a statement, Craigslist's CEO Jim Buckmaster said Tuesday's meeting was productive.

"We're optimistic that our shared concerns can be addressed...without compromising the quintessentially American values of free speech embodied in our constitution," Buckmaster said.

In November, Craigslist, at the urging of the states attorneys general, agreed to begin requiring a working phone number, a credit card, and a $5 fee for anyone using the erotic services section.

Blumenthal said that the action hasn't gone far enough and that if Craigslist doesn't respond positively in days, not months, the states' prosecutors will consider trying to change the law or finding another route to legal action against the site.

Recent posts from Digital Media
Judge halts BlueBeat's sale of Beatles tunes
EMI to offer instant concert recordings
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Jimmy Wales on what's next for Wikipedia
eBay's Skype sale gets go-ahead with settlement
No Doubt says 'no' to Band Hero depiction
Beatles copyright case down a legal rabbit hole
Getty and Flickr deepen photo-licensing ties
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (26 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by USDecliningDollar May 6, 2009 7:03 AM PDT
Blah, blah, blah - prosecutors trying to make a name for themselves and/or find a way to tap into Craig's pile o'cash.

I see the same "filth" in the newspaper classifieds. The same "filth" is in the back of The Onion and the like. Let me think about this ... wasn't New York Governor Elliot Spitzer busted for a high priced call girl? Now he is eying the NY AG post. I feel so good about the foxes guarding the hen house.
Reply to this comment
by tgrenier May 6, 2009 9:38 AM PDT
He was the AG before he became Governor
by divisionbyzero May 6, 2009 7:21 AM PDT
How about they do the sensible thing and in accordance with the First Amendment legalize prostitution? Regulate it like any other business and tax it. It's going to happen anyway and it might as well happen in the bright of day rather than in the dark corners of society. Instead of violating the First Amendment twice by making prostitution illegal and trying to censor craigslist we actually respect the Constitution for once?
Reply to this comment
by Michichael May 6, 2009 9:14 AM PDT
That would require having elected officials that actually understand the document and take their duties to defend it seriously.
by DatabaseDoctor May 6, 2009 7:37 AM PDT
Sounds like some AG's trying to make names for themselves. You see it all the time. Go after the low hanging fruit that strikes a chord with middle america. There is a billboard on I95 in the Ft Lauderdale area that is an ad for an escort service. That's ok but have an online ad for the same thing is wrong. A 50x 120 foot sign showing a hot chick asking you for a date that you have to see no matter what age you are and whether you want to see it or not is good but an online ad that you have to click on the section to find is bad.

Our AG's need to get a life, fight some real crime and stop spending all their time in porn-land. He who complains the loudest....
Reply to this comment
by DMAN3k May 6, 2009 7:49 AM PDT
Legalize prostitution. Get workers tested and licensed.

Stop legalizing morality.
Reply to this comment
by shuxclams May 6, 2009 8:18 AM PDT
More hooey! Legalize Prostitution now! Protect the sex workers, ensure that people in that field of work are not underage or undocumented. Get them health screenings and access to health care. This is backwards thinking, typical 'morality' driven nonsense. Prostitution is the worlds oldest profession and it's not going away even if you take the Craigslist Erotic Services section offline!
Reply to this comment
by akayanni May 6, 2009 8:18 AM PDT
1800hotchicks we are waiting for your call. Someone should dig up some dirt on the AGs and shut them up.
Reply to this comment
by rdupuy11 May 6, 2009 8:47 AM PDT
when someone says there is "No question, absolutely none, that Craigslist is operating an online brothel here"' well the only thing you can be absolutely sure of that there is a question.

Craiglist is a classified ad service, not a brothel. The fact that the AG thinks laws first need to be changed to make things illegal, shows they are overreaching their mandate. They don't pressure groups into following laws they, in their personal opinion, believe should be implemented someday.

Their charge is to enforce actual law, not made up/fantasy, wished for laws that may or may not ever be enacted.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian May 6, 2009 4:16 PM PDT
Is it ironic that you've shown more intelligence in this post than these AG's have in their actions?
by ferricoxide May 6, 2009 10:16 AM PDT
Sounds like CraigsList needs to re-incorporate offshore - maybe move their servers, too.

Just further proof that there must be no *real* crime out there that the busy-body AGs consider this crap to be a priority.
Reply to this comment
by askgees May 6, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
They should tell these prosecutors to pi$$ off. No laws have been violated other than the Gov. infringing on it's peoples rights. Maybe we should see what we can do to remove these idiots from their positions. If I'm not mistaken there elected officials. The ironic part more than likely will be, one of these so called bastions of the community (Elliot Spitzer part 2) will end up being busted. My monies on the ****** bag from Conn. Blumenthal. Liberals just can't keep from screwing them selves so he's the best pick. LOL
Reply to this comment
by unknown unknown May 6, 2009 11:28 AM PDT
Attorney General Henry McMaster should be removed from office, he is clueless or willfully ignorant of the law. Not to mention his willingness to ignore the fact for political expediency as he di with his much over hyped and misguided campaign against sexual predators online.
Reply to this comment
by Harrison912 May 6, 2009 11:33 AM PDT
As a web site owner of safety and security products that uses Craig's List occasionally to market my products, I have to say, whether they take their Erotic Services category down or not, it's obvious to me that anyone in that line of business should carry some form of non-lethal protection with them. There are lot's of people out there who are angry, resentful or other wise messed up and are looking for someone to take it out on and the erotic service industry certainly get their share of this demographic. We're all out there trying to make a living, legal or otherwise. Let's all be safe.
Reply to this comment
by victor_nyc May 6, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
First, I think we need to define prostitution. If we take the definition that it is an exchange of sex for goods, money or services, AG's have been prostitutes for some time now. Just because they don't all benefit from posting sex ads, they feel they need to beat their "drum" and sound some kind of alarm for all the morally self-righteous. I'll bet there's more than one AG who's posted on craigslist. The self-righteous are always looking to subjegate others for their own benefit. I say, leave people alone who aren't breaking any laws. Go after criminals and leave the rest of us alone.

By the way, in my opinion, prostitution should be legalized and regulated. There are far more crimes committed and will continue to be committed because it is illegal than would happen if it were legalized and regulated. Did no one learn anything from the prohibition of alcohol in the early 20th Century? There's a reason prostitution is the world's oldest profession. People will always do it and just making it illegal does nothing but keep AG's and lawyers fat and happy and the jails full. If anyone was REALLY serious about cutting the crime surrounding prostitution, they would be trying to legalize it and create safe environments for it. Otherwise it's just a pious rant about unsubstantiated morality and self-righteous oppression of the economically disadvantaged.

You CANNOT legislate morality!
Reply to this comment
by SpiritMatter May 6, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
Religious arguments are a waste of time or those who are not struggling with whether sexual pleasure and services or the use of recreational, performance enhancing, nutritional, etc. chemicals are right or wrong in God's eyes. Most of those, who want to do what God says is right and avoid what is wrong, do not seem to realize that much of what has been taught is God's will is actually the will of ascetic religious zealots and not God! Believe it or not, the "sexual pleasure with someone other than your spouse is naughty" idea and even the patriarchal system and slavery are not from the so called ?austere? Creator God! Believe it or not the seventh oral instruction from the Creator does not condemn the enjoyment of non-spousal, non-reproductive, disease free, consensual sexual pleasure!
But it is in the Bible! Yes it is in the Bible as an example of how some humans feel compelled to expand God's simple instructions. Any law of man or the Creator, that is applied in a way that is not consistent with the Creator?s way, is not commanded by God and is obeyed in vain!. Unlike many of man?s laws, the laws of the Creator were made for the benefit of man (all humans), man was not made for the benefit of the law. Human welfare and pleasure are the primary goals of the Creator, not obedience to a law! It was the adversary, not the Creator, who told Adam and Eve that their sexual anatomy was shameful and should be covered. The Creator had already declared it to be very good! They chose to believe the adversary, and the ascetics of the world have pushed this false guilt in the name of God ever since.
Then he said to them, "Shabbat was made for mankind, not mankind for Shabbat; (Mar 2:27 CJB)
"For My yoke is easy and My burden is light." (Mat11:30 NKJ)
You make known to me the path of life; in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore. (Psa 16:11 ESV)
You and others might think there is contrary evidence in the scriptures, or your church traditions, that originates with the Creator or the Christ, but it actually originates with a manmade extrapolation of the oral instructions from the Creator. Christ gave examples, concerning those under the Moses Mediated Covenant, showing where even Moses (almost a god to some), and those who sat in Moses' seat of authority down through the generations to the Pharisees of Christ's day, legitimately issued judgments in the name and authority of God, but the rulings were totally inconsistent with God's way and the goal that God's 10 oral instructions were designed to achieve! Christ tried to warn those in His future new covenant church not to repeat what the leaders did in the Moses mediated covenant church, Israel. But did they listen? Nooooo!
"For they bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. (Mat23:4 NKJ)
you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men; for you neither go in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in. (Mat23:13 NKJ)
Most Christian church leaders did not hear any better than the Pharisees. As a result, many Christians are as burdened today with manmade rules as the average Jew was in Christ's day. Christ basically said we should examine the judgment in the scripture or tradition and if it is not consistent with God's simple demand that we love our neighbor as our self and not harm our neighbor, it is null and void!
And in vain they worship Me, Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men. (Mark7:7 NKJ)
So is there an easier way for each individual to sort out which actions are good and which actions are bad? Yes! You don't have to learn Greek or Hebrew unless you want counsel from the recorded opinions of well meaning but fallible Hebrews and Christians. Their opinions can be helpful but are not always consistent with God's way and goal for humans.
Love does no harm to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. (Rom13:10 NKJ)
All scripturally based doctrines and laws sink or swim based on their consistency with the Creator?s fundamental principles that all humans are equal(love of self=love of other) and no human should use God?s law to justify forcing their will on their neighbor(wife, another nation, etc.).
36 "Rabbi, which of the mitzvot in the Torah is the most important?"
37 He told him, "'You are to love ADONAI your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.'
38 This is the greatest and most important mitzvah.
39 And a second is similar to it, 'You are to love your neighbor as yourself.'
40 All of the Torah and the Prophets are dependent on these two mitzvot."
(Mat 22:36-40 CJB)
Reply to this comment
by SpiritMatter May 6, 2009 12:28 PM PDT
Sorry! I left a critical letter out in the first sentence. It should be........

Religious arguments are a waste of time for those who are not struggling with whether sexual pleasure and services or the use of recreational, performance enhancing, nutritional, etc. chemicals are right or wrong in God's eyes.
Reply to this comment
by AXG May 6, 2009 1:29 PM PDT
While legalizing prostitution, do not forget to include drugs, corruption, bribery, extortion murder and rape. Lot of money can be made in taxes by legalizing these vices. Police officers can be let go resulting in huge savings.

How can anyone compare a billboard, no matter how large it is or a classified in a local newspaper to a website which is accessible to millions? I have not seen the billboard in Florida or newspaper classifieds but I have seen Craigslist.

Given a choice between sacrificing personal freedom and crime prevention, I would choose later.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian May 6, 2009 4:20 PM PDT
I know, you're using sarcasm right? No one can be as stupid as you are pretending to be, except maybe infants.
by skrubol May 7, 2009 6:51 AM PDT
AXG, if you aren't being sarcastic, you are part of the reason this country/world looks to be doomed. By sacrificing freedom, little by little for safety, you eventually end up with no freedom at all.
The founding fathers are rolling in their graves I'm sure.
by rdupuy11 May 6, 2009 1:59 PM PDT
@AXG

You would sacrifice personal freedom for a candy bar. Just tell the truth, you hate freedom, and feel more comfortable without it.

The problem is, that these people can do a lot of damage to Craigslist, but it would have no impact whatsoever on crime.

You forgot on your list of vices, smoking, alcohol, overeating and being lazy.

If you need to lump all vices together, including legal ones and illegal ones, without regard to any common sense, or any ability to separate one from the other, then please, by all means, demonstrate your extremism in full.

I think reasonable people will reject your argument, however.
Reply to this comment
by kalel33 May 6, 2009 2:30 PM PDT
I too reject the notion and the fear mongering religious right diatribe.
by WaWaWa1970 May 6, 2009 3:03 PM PDT
Like it, or not: Prostitution is illegal. Until that changes, Craigslist is responsible for fascinating illegal activities. They can?t let users sell guns or explosives, (which is actually legal, with a license) and they can?t let users sell drugs. What makes them think they can let users sell sex?..???
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian May 6, 2009 4:29 PM PDT
Craigslist isn't selling sex for money, people are. They are advertising on Craigslist, as well as your local newspaper and dozens of other weekly publications. Craigslist could eliminate the "erotic" section entirely and watch the prostitutes advertise in the personal section, would that make you feel better?

You're right in that prostitution is illegal. So which is the better choice, having the prostitutes advertise their services openly in an erotic section where they are easy to find and track (and arrest when necessary), or to have them advertise their services secretly in some other "innocent" section (personals? want ads? classifieds?) where they will be difficult to find or track and virtually impossible to arrest?

We won't bother touching the fact that guns, explosives and drugs can all be used to hurt other people, but I can't for the life of me think of a way to hurt someone by having consensual sex with an adult.

Why can't moralistic retardicans at least use someone else's brain instead of proving how impossibly retarded they are?
by tcr071 May 6, 2009 11:18 PM PDT
Craigslist has Federal Protection. These Attorney Genera are posturing for votes because they have to obviously know they have absolutely no legal ground to stand on. They won't even get it to a trial.
Reply to this comment
by solblack May 7, 2009 9:37 AM PDT
I would be mad about this but it's coming from the most corrupt state in the union.
Bite the Big Apple don't mind the Maggots!
Reply to this comment
(26 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right