Lime Wire tells Congress its P2P software is safe now
In response to the reopening of an investigation into inadvertent file sharing with peer-to-peer software, an executive for Lime Wire told Congress in a letter on Friday that the new version of the program is "the most secure file-sharing software available."
The main investigative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives reopened a probe of Lime Wire and other peer-to-peer file-sharing companies last week, citing data breaches blamed on the technology.
In February, a security firm alleged that information about President Obama's helicopter was breached via P2P. There have also been reports of inadvertent exposure of consumer financial data and medical records over peer-to-peer, according to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
In a letter sent Friday to the Committee and congressional members, Mark Gorton, the chairman of Lime Wire parent Lime Group, said LimeWire 5, released on December 8, was designed to eliminate inadvertent file sharing in response to privacy concerns.
LimeWire 5 by default does not share documents, it automatically un-shares documents a user may have shared using an older version of the software, and by default will not share documents regardless of whether they exist in a folder that has been shared or whether a user shared the document in an older version, said Gorton's letter, a copy of which was obtained by CNET News.
"In short, there is absolutely no way to access a LimeWire 5 user's documents unless that user affirmatively elects to make them available," he wrote. "LimeWire 5 does not share any file of any type without explicit permission from the user."
Meanwhile, the company has no specific information about the reports of data breaches that the Committee had mentioned, Gorton said.
The Committee initially launched its probe into inadvertent file-sharing with P2P in mid-2007 and had called Gorton and others to testify.
Meanwhile, another congressional subcommittee is planning to hold a hearing on P2P technology. The House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection has scheduled a hearing for Monday at 2 p.m. EDT on the "Informed P2P User Act," introduced by California Rep. Mary Bono Mack, a Republican, her office said.
Scheduled to testify at the hearing are the Federal Trade Commission, the Business Software Alliance, the Center for Democracy & Technology, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Distributed Computing Industry Association, Tiversa, and the Progress and Freedom Foundation.
Lime Group's letter assures Congress that its new peer-to-peer software eliminates inadvertent file-sharing.
(Credit: Lime Group)
Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor. 



Quick question: What's harder than finding illegitimate MP3s and movies on the Net? Answer: Finding Legitimate MP3s and Movies on the net that artists have released for digital distribution.
e.g. lets say I'm looking for the original P2P released movie trailer of a certain movie, searching on the net turns up dozens of copies, most of which are not the original, some have viruses or malware. Having some kind of rights confirmation system wuld help me find the legitimate copy.
There is only so much you can do to save users form themselves.
@Maccess you can set it to return only works with a license attached. Since Limewire has integrated Creative Commons licensing.
Actually, you did. Several years ago LimeWire added a license check mechanism in the software that referred to servers in New York whenever a user wanted to download a file and confirmed whether it was permitted by the copyright holder.
The big labels refused to put it to use, chose to sue LimeWire instead and have been in court ever since, trying hard to keep their self-inflicted predicament out of the public eye because LimeWire has been holding their business practices up to the light and the court wouldn't shield them from scrutiny.
In the meantime, Maccess, the fight against the spam goes on and even without the rights check (which you can still turn on at any time) the spam problem will start dying out as more people upgrade to version 5 and as this new version matures.
And if people knew how to use a program, even reading the FAQ or looking at what they are doing, and people seriously need to RTFM, then things like these mistakes wouldn't have happened.
But meh that's how some people get a paycheck, right? lol
Atlas will shrug.
- by aaasolanki May 8, 2009 9:50 PM PDT
- Just tried to use Version 5 a few days ago and I must say it is pretty much infested with trojans/malware.
- Reply to this comment
-
(20 Comments)