April 27, 2009 4:45 PM PDT

Facebooking while out sick gets employee fired

by Erik Palm
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 58 comments

Updated at 5:08 p.m. PDT with quotes from former Nationale Suisse employee.

CNET previously reported that Facebook users risk having a lower GPA. Now, according to Reuters and other sources, using the social-networking site could have another unpleasant side effect: getting you fired. At least that's what happened to a Swiss insurance worker who lost her job after surfing Facebook while out sick, her employer said Friday.

The unnamed woman said she had to be away from her monitor lying in the dark, but was then seen to be active on Facebook. Insurance company Nationale Suisse said in a statement that behavior had destroyed its trust in the employee.

"This abuse of trust, rather than the activity on Facebook, led to the ending of the work contract," a spokesman for the firm said.

The woman admitted to having used Facebooked on her iPhone, but accused the insurance company of spying on her by sending a mysterious friend request that made the company see her activities. The company denied the accusation and said a colleague stumbled over her activity, before Nationale Suisse banned use of the popular site in the company.

But she said she is not suing the company and that she is happy to have gotten a neutral termination letter and doesn't want to go back. "My trust for this employer is gone," the 31-year-old woman told Swiss daily newspaper 20 Minuten.

"Facebook is dead for me," she added.

This isn't the first time we've heard a discussion about losing a job due to Facebook use. Those scared of that destiny might want to watch this CNET TV video: Don't let Facebook get you fired.

Erik Palm, a business reporter for Swedish national television, is joining CNET News as a spring 2009 fellow with Stanford University's Innovation Journalism program. When he's not working, he enjoys kayaking and exploring California's hiking trails. E-mail Erik.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Time Warner Cable shows subscribers how to cut cord
Want to see Google's new phone on YouTube?
AT&T cuts Tiger Woods
Online holiday sales hit $27 billion
Amazon touts top products of 2009
Teen Muziic founder chastised by Vevo
Microsoft, Yahoo help keep India away from porn?
Zuckerberg spends Christmas dethroning Google
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (58 Comments)
by myles taylor April 27, 2009 4:59 PM PDT
My boss uses facebook while at work, as do most of my coworkers. I guess that's what helps about working at a nice relaxing place. we still get a lot of work done; don't worry.
Reply to this comment
by kojacked April 28, 2009 12:28 PM PDT
Note to self: do not hire anyone by the name of Myles Taylor. Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do something. This is why America is falling apart. People have no work ethic.
by d3vildog69 April 28, 2009 1:28 PM PDT
Or maybe people don't want to be mindless slaves working for someone. People have a life, the idea that you force someone to concetrate on work 100% is outdated. I may work for a company, but the hell if i'm gonna give up my free thinking and relaxation. Less stress = happier employee = better company. Welcome to reality dude.
by cvaldes1831 April 28, 2009 8:36 PM PDT
Frankly, I'd rather work hard and get 6 weeks of paid vacation, like in civilized countries.
by inachu1 April 29, 2009 10:40 AM PDT
People that fire women that use facebook at home are the same ones who want PTO every single week as if they desrve it. The person who fired her needs to be fired.
by gggg sssss April 29, 2009 6:14 PM PDT
@ d3vildog69 but the contract you make for getting paid so much an hour is that you will work that hour. Screwing around on facebook does not constitute work. Unless of course you are a govt employee ( note I did not say worker)
by d3vildog69 April 30, 2009 5:49 PM PDT
gggg ssss

Doesn't change the fact that an employee who is happier at work is going to do more work, compared to an employee that is constantly looking at his watch, waiting to go home. We don't live in an age where every time your done with work, you can see it. Be proud of it, in a computer age, when you make pie charts or fill out spreadsheets. You can't take pride in that because it doesn't amount to anything, to some it may again i make no absolute assumptions. In this society we are expected to sit in front of chairs and do work that morally doesn't make us feel complete.

Work on a farm, do physical labor that you can see, touch and enjoy. You will love your job and be happy, this is why employees seek out Facebook on the job, they can't do anything else that makes them happy sides message a buddy about happier hour cause work sucks.

But if you take away the restirction, and permit employees to check if they want everyonce 'n awhile ecause it brings them a little light, a smile to their face and know they won't get fired. Then why not? yu can set up abuse policies, and such for over use. God knows as a System Admin myself you can tell how long someone is on a site.

Companies need to find a way to make the employee get lost in their work cause they enjoy it. Obviously this will not work for everyone. But about 90% is probably pretty close to what you can get.

People want to be People, not slaves. This is what money has done to our Global Society. Something that needs to be fixed. A dollar is never more important than another human, period.

P.S Former Marine, working for the Government sucks Lmao
by rapier1 April 27, 2009 5:03 PM PDT
I think the main thing is that she was seemingly caught in a lie not that the company hates people using facebook.
Reply to this comment
by PacGamer April 27, 2009 5:32 PM PDT
I agree. If she said that she would be offline and "in the dark" and used her iPhone to connect to facebook, then she lied. It's one thing to get fired just for using Facebook, but this was not the case.
by Random_Walk April 27, 2009 7:14 PM PDT
Exactly. There have been days where I was down and hating it - sick enough that I didn't trust myself with a production server, but conscious enough to waste a few hours on F/B or in a flash game or whatnot while in bed.

OTOH, this employee was stupid - you don't lie to the boss as to why you're not at work and expect to keep your job.
by Mergatroid Mania April 28, 2009 12:09 AM PDT
How does anyone know whether or not she spent half the day in the dark before going onto Facebook? The article doesn't mention this. Maybe she stayed in bed for half a day and logged on to Facebook when she was feeling better.
Maybe she logged on for a few minutes to update something, or leave a message before going back to bed.

It's pretty hard to say she lied with so little information. I think the benefit of the doubt should have been the order of the day.
by padotj April 28, 2009 12:49 PM PDT
I agree with Mergatroid Mania,
Firing her because she was caught on Facebook is a little extreme. Especially since the company may not have all the information.

I think she made an error when telling her boss her exact condition. If she really was sick, she could have said, I'm sick. I'll bring a dr. note. In America, you don't have to disclose the reason why you're sick.
by Harrison912 April 30, 2009 10:42 AM PDT
I agree, Rapier1, her employer is an insurance company and they said it wasn't the FaceBook activity but the trust issue that cost her her job. I completely get that. As a web site owner of safety and security products, trust is key in almost every relationship but we put very little value on it because we all want the freedom to lie when it suits us. The truth is, lieing is wrong and it destroys trust. We need to stop making excuses for it and explaining it away. Thanks, Erik, for sharing this story with us.
by Sam Papelbon April 27, 2009 5:42 PM PDT
however it's also a bit shady that a company would make a fake profile to monitor employees. i would be glad to have been fired, too. then again i don't accept all friend requests regardless if i know them or not.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 April 27, 2009 7:16 PM PDT
Assuming that's what they actually did. For some reason I don't think that's what actually happened here.
by calculatorwatch April 27, 2009 9:10 PM PDT
either way she's an idiot for being facebook friends w/ anyone that would do that, I hate when people just try to have as many friends as possible

but I still think the company's more at fault, they complately overreacted, and spied at least to some extent, I wouldn't want to work there either if I was her
by inachu1 April 28, 2009 7:32 AM PDT
I only accept pretty girls on my facebook. Men sorry but this guy blocks all of you unless we are ex coworkers and have similar tastes in women.
by carlg113 April 27, 2009 5:43 PM PDT
jeez.. did they think she was on her death bed when she called out sick? just because you have the energy to click a mouse button does not mean you can go to work and spew your germs to the office.
Reply to this comment
by sandman08 April 27, 2009 5:59 PM PDT
i think the point was that she used a monitor when the reason she claimed sick leave was because looking at her computer hurt her eyes. Their reasoning probably was, if she can see well enough to use facebook, she should be well enough to work.
by Random_Walk April 27, 2009 7:21 PM PDT
@carl: It's called "work from home". If you're salary/exempt, you can expect to do it once in awhile unless you're way-the-hell sick. I spent a week this past winter stuck with the flu (not the one on TV today) - out of those five days, I spent three of them on VPN to work making sure I didn;t fall behind on projects.

It's not unusual, or even that uncommon - I was well enough to get some work done, but didn't much feel like spreading the love (read: germs) at work.
by tm_anon April 27, 2009 8:17 PM PDT
@sandman08

have you ever noticed the difference in screen size between a normal monitor and the iPhone? I can see being able to look at the iPhone screen when the full size monitor hurts my eyes. It's like needing a break from looking at the computer screen so you go watch some TV.
by gggg sssss April 29, 2009 6:17 PM PDT
@ tm_anon and what work do you do where you go watch tv when you feel like iT? Union autoworker maybe?
by JCPayne April 27, 2009 6:39 PM PDT
I take-it with all the press about the Mexican Swine flu that the company thinks staying home is bad? There has to be more than meets the eye. They must have stayed home on a day the company really needed them. Unless- they put something in their facebook status that says they wasn't home or in bed. E.g. "just went shopping" or "Just got back from a ballgame" or something like that. Or mabey they have an on-going attendence problem.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 April 27, 2009 7:18 PM PDT
Well, the reason she called off is because she said she was too sick to even look at a monitor.

From the above article "The unnamed woman said she had to be away from her monitor lying in the dark, but was then seen to be active on Facebook"

She was on facebook hence she didn't 'have to be in the dark averting her eyes from all glowing things. Therefore she lied and thus she was fired.
by rleeper25 April 27, 2009 7:05 PM PDT
Funny how the co-worker "stumbled" upon her activity. Checking it while at work is ok apparently.
Reply to this comment
by servermaker April 27, 2009 7:08 PM PDT
Probably so; but lying and using it at home is not though, apparently.
by rapier1 April 28, 2009 6:46 PM PDT
Actually, the article said that at the time using facebook at work was acceptable.
by aSiriusTHoTH April 27, 2009 7:36 PM PDT
A bit over board in my mind. A persons activities while not at work is no business of any employer. Pissed she wasn't at work... working. Then don't pay her.

I myself am paid a salary wage. Which I routinely work 45 - 55 hours a week. So if I miss a day at work and work from home... it's still paid. Or if i'm really sick and cannot work... I stay at home and recover. Doing whatever I want...
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk April 27, 2009 9:03 PM PDT
It's not exactly that easy - there's a lot more to it. I'm salary/exempt, but I have projects that are either ongoing, or inbound all the time. If they don't get done, I have to account for why, and I'd better have a damned good reason for it. Yeah, I get paid whether I'm there or not, but if I slack off? The email spam filters don't get updated. Servers don't get patched. The new intranet server features don't get coded. The virtual server farm doesn't stay balanced and tuned. The SAN clogs up as disks overflow... and if I'm not there to make sure that (and more) doesn't happen, I have to account for it.
by Mergatroid Mania April 28, 2009 12:14 AM PDT
Then maybe you should tell your bosses that you need an assistant who can do these things if you get sick. And tell them you worry about being sick so much you think it might make you sick.
It's not healthy to never be able to take a nonproductive sick day.
Besides, just because you have all that junk you have to do, doesn't mean everyone else has.
by Orion Blastar April 27, 2009 8:34 PM PDT
Working and using Facebook are two different things. When you work you stress yourself out and it does strain your eyes. An iPhone screen does not strain your eyes like a monitor at work would. Apple designed the iPhone to be anti-glare and be soft on the eyes so it can be used longer. The average computer monitor does not do that.

Still an employer that fires people for using Facebook while sick is not an employer one wants to work for. I think it is a bogus charge. I'll bet her co-workers use Facebook while at work as does her managers, and that is how they knew she was on Facebook.
Reply to this comment
by Mergatroid Mania April 28, 2009 12:15 AM PDT
Yeah, well they pretty much said that in the article, so good guess...
by NickKaplan April 27, 2009 8:36 PM PDT
That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Who says you can't use Facebook while sick, and on top of that, someones Facebook activity is none of their employer's business. She was stupid not to sue. That is ridiculous BS. I would be pissed.
Reply to this comment
by shevaberg April 27, 2009 9:17 PM PDT
She cannot read a full size montor but she can read the 6 inch display on the iphone...

She worked in an insurance company... she violated the trust... if you cant compute at work dont compute at home...
Reply to this comment
by sfk1987 April 27, 2009 11:01 PM PDT
They spied on her that is an invasion of privacy.
Reply to this comment
by chili_picante April 28, 2009 10:14 AM PDT
Facebook is a public forum. There was no invasion of privacy, if ?a colleague stumbled over her activity.? That?s no different than getting fired for calling in sick and being seen shopping at the mall. But, I do think that the company over-reacted. (Maybe there were other issues with this employee?)
by seb33sf April 28, 2009 1:52 PM PDT
I think chili_picante nailed it in the last sentence. For whatever reason, it seems that the company was looking for an excuse to fire this person. Maybe she was taking too much sick time, maybe there were other performance issues, maybe the boss was a jerk and just had it out for her (who knows?) but I find it hard to imagine a scenario where a well-liked top-tier performer would be let go over something like this. The article mentioned that she was happy to get a neutral termination letter and is not suing. I suspect she signed an agreement to this effect - wonder if she was bullied into this by the threat of a negative recommendation, or whether she was an underperformer happy to part on neutral terms.
by paul613 April 28, 2009 5:57 AM PDT
Talented young job seeker will now regard that company as a hostile place to work. If I ran Nationale Suisse, I'd fire the decision maker(s) who fired her.
Reply to this comment
by Magicland April 28, 2009 9:28 AM PDT
Yeah, like they've got problems handing out jobs. Maybe you haven't noticed, but jobs are a scarcity these days (at least ones where "would you like fries with that?" aren't part of your daily vocabulary), I bet they had folks lining up to fill her job...
by rapier1 April 28, 2009 6:47 PM PDT
How do you know she was talented?
by crazynexus April 28, 2009 7:16 AM PDT
Read:

The company denied the accusation and said a colleague stumbled over her activity, before Nationale Suisse banned use of the popular site in the company.

Apparently the use of facebook is banned by the company, and a colleague stumbled on her activity before hand. I could see why a company woudl ban its employees from using it, a lot of information can be gleaned from peoples' accounts if they're ridiculous and 1) have an open profile and 2) accept any and all invites for friends.
Reply to this comment
by dbloyd April 28, 2009 7:57 AM PDT
She was sick. Not dead. Sick as in not bring a virus in the office.
Reply to this comment
by T_Tran April 28, 2009 8:34 AM PDT
I never call out of work sick unless I'm sick. And if I was sick and decided that I don't feel like driving to work, and sitting in a building for 8-10 hrs a day, who is to say I can't sit at home on my computer to play video games, browse the web, or watch TV.

What's next? Am I not allowed to drive to the local Walgreens or Rite Aid to pick up some medicine because I'm afraid that the boss may send a coworker to spy on me because I should be too sick to drive? That's why the employer provides "sick days" so that one can stay home, rest and relax to get better. Calling out sick does not mean that you're on your death bed and incapable of leisure activities.

If you were my coworker and you were sick, I'd prefer you to stay home as well. The boss must have been a micromanaging a**hole.
Reply to this comment
by Zaunto April 28, 2009 9:56 AM PDT
Wait a minute,

An employee is out sick and someone at their job just "happened to notice" that they were "logged into Facebook? Unless I'm missing something, the only way you can SEE if someone is logged into Facebook is to BE LOGGED INTO FACE BOOK !! In addition to that, you can't "come across someone being logged into Facebook unless they are on your friend list because if they are not, you have to actively search for them. So yea, she was spied on by someone who ratted her out to the boss, probably thinking that it would get them some sort of reward. More important than the fact that someone at her job spied on her to determine if she was logged into Facebook, she wasn't onsite at her job nor was she using her workplace computer to access Facebook. Maybe the laws are different in Europe, but here in the USA, if my employer fired me for being logged into Facebook while OUT OF THE OFFICE AND ON MY CELL PHONE, I would sue the pants off them and win a huge settlement, while dragging them down in the media for being idiots. She should sue.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 April 28, 2009 6:50 PM PDT
Actually, no, you wouldn't sue their pants off because I can say with 95% certainty that you work in an 'at-will' state which means your employeer can fire you for almost any reason whatsoever.

And yes, you are very clever, you noticed that you had to be logged into facebook to sww if she was logged in. If you had actually read the article you'd have read that at the time the employer wasn't preventing people from using facebook while at work.
by bemenaker April 28, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
What, this company had no business firing her for this. So she used facebook while at home sick. Should she be fired for watching TV during the day while resting too? The mental stress of laying on your couch and using Facebook is not the stress of sitting at your desk doing your job. The two are not the same at all. She should have sued the company over this. You are allowed a private life. You are allowed to get out of bed if you stay home sick.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 April 28, 2009 6:50 PM PDT
I'm starting to think that no one actually read the article.
by dmt121 April 28, 2009 11:37 PM PDT
I think everyone here is jumping to a conclusion. You see the word sick and assume cold or flu, but she could not look at a computer screen. That screams Migraine in my book.
If she took her medicine, maybe even took a nap and a snack, she could be up and around by late afternoon. Offices have that horrid lighting, and it is torture for migraines, as are computer screens. Especially if your employer has no intention of working with you about your work environment.
I suffer from migraines, and on a bad day I am in bed until after dark. On an OK day I may only sleep a few hours after I take my pills. Before you ask, no, I would not try to work taking one of these pills. Many of them are so strong that you are legally intoxicated after taking one, and even the milder ones can impair cognitive function.
I was fired from a job when my Store Manager, and the Corporate office, refused to accept 'Migraine' as a valid reason for a sick day. Under pressure to not miss another day of work I went to work after taking one of my pills. I do not remember that day, at all, but was accused of something that ultimately got me fired. I do not drink, nor do I use drugs.
So, maybe all of the employers and supervisors out there will learn a lesson. If you need to, talk to their doctor, get it in writing, but don't assume that people on painkillers or similar medications should come in to work. They seriously impair cognitive function, and there is no telling what they may do or say. You would not allow a drunk to carry out million dollar deals, to drive a fork lift, to reliably fill orders, or to drive a company truck.
Reply to this comment
by gggg sssss April 29, 2009 6:22 PM PDT
you poor thing, having to work for a living. Having to take pills for your migrains. So quit, go on wellfare, live in a trailer. But dont collect a wage from some employer
by Len Bullard April 29, 2009 11:41 AM PDT
"... she lied"

But isn't that supposed to be a skill so valuable to industry, OReilly holds camps with games that are designed to improve this career critical social skill?
Reply to this comment
by April 29, 2009 12:44 PM PDT
You all are missing the point... What she was really fired for was using her cell phone while she was out sick. THATS the outrageous part of it. Think about it, you're laying there in bed, your phone dings cause you got an email or you just finished a phone call, and while its in your hand, you checked one of the apps you use on the phone. BOOM you're fired.
Reply to this comment
by miles4444 April 30, 2009 8:50 PM PDT
I agree 100%.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (58 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right