• On The Insider: Miley Cyrus in Sex and the City 2
April 15, 2009 12:48 PM PDT

Google's first-quarter finances: A fine line

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

Google has withstood the current economic troubles better than other advertising-dependent companies, but on Thursday, investors will get to see how well the company's belt-tightening is offsetting the recession's deepening effects.

The search giant, which makes the vast majority of its revenue when people click on ads next to search results, reports first-quarter financial results Thursday after the market closes. So far, though, financial analysts are mixed on whether Google's glass is half full or half empty.

On average, analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expect revenue excluding commissions to increase 11 percent to $4.085 billion and earnings to increase 2 percent to $4.93 per share compared with a year ago. Because Google reported $4.22 billion in fourth-quarter revenue excluding commissions, this could be the first revenue drop from one quarter to the next.

Google's Mountain View, Calif., headquarters

Google's Mountain View, Calif., headquarters

(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET)

But analysts differ in their assessments.

Broadpoint AmTech analyst Rob Sanderson is on the half-empty side. He downgraded Google's stock from "buy" to "neutral," with this to say: "We believe consensus estimates are too high and need to come down for the first quarter and second quarter...We see the stock as more risky in the near-term and believe there may be a better entry point."

But Oppenheimer & Co.'s Jason Helfstein and Anil Gupta differ, expecting Google to meet or beat analyst expectations based on favorable developments with search ad payments. Despite lowering overall 2009 financial projections because of the recession and currency conversion rate issues, Google's "valuation remains compelling" and the analysts raised their stock price target from $390 to $410.

Ripple effects
Though Google's atypical business means it's hard to apply its fortunes to the overall market, its results have ripple effects.

For example, in the long run, the degree of Google's profitability could have repercussions for the company's high innovation rate. Google has shown the patience to invest in services that at least in the short run are money sinkholes. YouTube is the most prominent example, but newer arrivals include a revamped Google Voice, the Android mobile phone operating system, App Engine cloud-computing infrastructure, and Chrome browser.

A more restrained Google has cut several projects that weren't performing up to snuff, not just online services such as Dodgeball but also potential revenue-generation engines such as print and radio ads. And it's cut hundreds of employees through the process--nearly 200 in sales and marketing, 100 recruiters, 40 in a radio ad project, and an undisclosed number of contractors.

So far, the cuts haven't come close to the bone, but Google is being more careful choosing which projects to explore. Google now has "more focused resource allocations going into 2009...The review process is now a part of how we do business," said Jonathan Rosenberg, senior vice president of product management, as Google reported results from the fourth quarter of 2008.

For regular folks on the Web, that could mean fewer Google services or slower improvements to existing services. For competitors such as Facebook, Yahoo, or Microsoft, that could mean a little more breathing room, though of course no competitor is going to be complacent about the Google juggernaut.

Search ad questions
Google's reticence about financial performance and projections keeps people guessing about exactly how it's faring, and the present economic uncertainty compounds the situation. However, there are some data points worth noting.

First is, of course, how much people are searching. Each new search is an opportunity for Google--or search rivals Yahoo and Microsoft--to show an advertisement.

Next is ad coverage. Search engines must carefully balance showing ads more frequently, which can lead to more clicks on those ads and therefore more revenue, against showing them only when they're relevant to the searcher's query, which increases the likelihood that people will find the ads useful. Irrelevant or spammy ads instill the dreaded "ad blindness," in which people grow to ignore ads altogether.

Nielsen said searches grew 16.7 percent annually to 9.5 billion searches in March 2009, with Google outpacing the market with 27.6 percent growth to 6.1 billion searches. But upon seeing the more closely watched numbers from ComScore, JP Morgan analyst Imran Khan lowered his projections of Google's revenue and profit, and lowered his price target as well from $430 to $409.

"We think U.S. search performance will be weaker than previously expected," Khan said in a research note.

Cost-per-click declines
Bad news for search ad fortunes in general were results from Efficient Frontier, a search engine marketing company, which found that companies spent less per search ad in the first quarter of 2009. However, that effect was offset by greater search engine traffic and higher ad coverage, so it's not clear what the overall effect will be to Google and to search companies in general. The uncertainty is made worse by the fact that many statistics are only for the United States, but search and search advertising is a global business.

Finally, there's uncertainty about just how much effect Google's cost cuts are having. Khan estimates Google's expenses will be cut by about $450 million throughout all 2009.

Overall, though, there's no question that Google dominates a large and growing business. The troubles could be big or small, short or long, but Google's online cash engine remains stronger than those at Microsoft or Yahoo.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Groom updates Twitter, Facebook at the altar
Tools for creating holiday-shopping lists
Study: Sites to bring in billions in holiday donations
Another e-tailer named in probe changes course
At last, Google has some parasites
Facebook and MySpace delete N.Y. sex offenders
Study: Cyber Monday sees strong gains
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by slecalvez April 15, 2009 3:44 PM PDT
This shows that Google is still a great marketing company with a strong technological background but not a software one. IMO, Google suffers the same identity crisis as Amazon. The latter with its EC2 and Google with their "enteprise software". Stick to what you do best...
Reply to this comment
by eltoro2827 April 15, 2009 4:39 PM PDT
i hope they die a horrible death.
Reply to this comment
by codynews April 15, 2009 6:33 PM PDT
I'm no fan of google (due to their politics) but what makes you say that? Seems a bit harsh...
by GajaKannan April 15, 2009 8:24 PM PDT
I certainly agree Google gets too much credit than what they deserve and they are overrated, compared to the high failure rate as mentioned by author like youtube, andriod, chrome, etc., But they are still an innovatoin engine and made companies like Microsoft to go back to drawing board and reinvent... I would not want them to fail and die. I want them to focus thier efforts...
by matthewbulat April 15, 2009 10:17 PM PDT
Google has a great range of diversified products. They are still the number 1 website with Yahoo at 2. Some of the cloud computing efforts such a Gmail and Google Docs are scaling up. Google Adwords and Google Adsense is expanding its reach across more websites. Google Analytics is so helpful is an online world for business. I can see on my website Google Chrome is 7% of visitors which is great for a new product. Google search also provide 50% of the website traffic which is a good thing.
Keep up the good work.
Matthew Bulat
http://www.matthewb.id.au/
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

With eye to the future, try raw photos today

Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right