April 15, 2009 8:20 AM PDT

Report: Amazon blocks Phorm from its U.K. site

by Dawn Kawamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

Update at 9:08 a.m. PDT, with a statement from Phorm.

Amazon.com has reportedly blocked the use of the controversial behavioral-advertising system Phorm on its British site, according to a BBC report.

The move comes as the European Commission takes action against the United Kingdom, alleging that the country failed to adequately comply with data protection laws in Europe.

In the case involving the United Kingdom, the Commission initiated action after complaints arose over Phorm trials British Telecom launched in 2006 and 2007, in which it allowed Phorm's behaviorial-tracking technology onto its network without users' consent, according to a ZDNet UK report.

Amazon was not immediately available for comment Wednesday morning.

Phorm, however, said in a statement

There is a process in place to allow publishers to contact Phorm and opt out of the system, but we do not comment on individual cases.

Phorm's technology is designed to allow its customers to observe a user's behavior while online, such as Web sites visited or keywords entered, and then serve up relevant advertisements based on that behavior. The controversy over Phorm's technology revolves largely around privacy issues.

In the case of Amazon.co.uk, the BBC reported that the online e-commerce giant issued a statement that it had contacted British Telecom's Webwise, which markets the Phorm platform, and requested that all of its domains be opted-out of the program. According to the BBC report, Phorm noted that it has policies that allow customers to opt out of its system.

And that is what The Open Rights Group is hoping a number of major Web site publishers will do. Last month, the organization called upon Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, eBay, and Amazon to opt out of the Phorm system, according to the BBC report.

And from that group, Amazon marks the first company to give an indication that it is taking such action, the BBC noted.

Dawn Kawamoto covers enterprise security and financial news relating to technology for CNET News. E-mail Dawn.
Recent posts from Digital Media
China arrests thousands in Web porn crackdown
When policemen are caught looking at Web porn
Time Warner Cable shows subscribers how to cut cord
Want to see Google's new phone on YouTube?
AT&T cuts Tiger Woods
Online holiday sales hit $27 billion
Amazon touts top products of 2009
Teen Muziic founder chastised by Vevo
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by itworker--2008 April 15, 2009 9:12 AM PDT
[quote]The action comes as the European Commission takes action against the United Kingdom, alleging that the country failed to adequately comply with data protection laws in Europe. [/qoute]

What's the EU going to do next, sue the world?
I think all the countries should sue the EU for being suck @#$%s

And I always thought the US was the world police....well I guess they still are. The EU just happens to be the world bottom feeding lawyers
Reply to this comment
by n3td3v April 15, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
[quote]And I always thought the US was the world police...[/quote]

That's what they thought.
by Dalkorian April 16, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
America!
[curse] yeah!
Coming again to save the mother [cursing] day yeah!
America!
[curse] yeah!
Freedom is the only way yeah!
Terrorist your game is through,
'cuz now you have to answer to ...
America!
[curse] yeah!
so lick my [censored] and suck on my [censored]!
America!
[curse] yeah!
Whatcha going to do when we come for you now?

That should be clean enough to make it past the nazi's, but we'll see how long it lasts (if at all).
by gggg sssss April 15, 2009 3:20 PM PDT
about time. Bad enough that homeland security here analysys everything we do. At least we can believe taht it keeps us safe. To watch our private action sto sell us feminine pads is revolting.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian April 16, 2009 12:27 PM PDT
Opt out? Every customer, every website? How ridiculous is that? It should be required to make these nazi big brother companies use opt IN situations instead of opt out and the onus should be on the perpetrator (Phorm in this case), not their victims.

Who really cares how much work Phorm has to go through to set something like this up? Why should ANYONE be forced to go through anything to opt in or out for Phorm's benefit? Require companies like this to acquire WRITTEN PERMISSION from ALL INVOLVED before instigating something like this - every user, every website. Impossible? Like we care, that's Phorm's problem to resolve, not ours!

BOYCOTT ALL "BEHAVIORAL TRACKING" SOFTWARE VEHEMENTLY! Tell companies like Phorm they're number one by giving them "the finger". You know which one I mean!
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right