NASA's next node will be named...
Chalk one up for Steven Colbert, kind of.
NASA announced Friday afternoon that astronaut Sunita Williams will appear Tuesday on "The Colbert Report" to unveil the name of the newest node for the International Space Station.
From everything NASA has indicated, the node probably won't be named for the comedian. It likely will be dubbed "Serenity," based on the official voting results on NASA's site.
NASA ran an online contest earlier this year to name the node. The agency's official suggestions: Earthrise, Serenity, Venture, and Legacy. But NASA also (naively, perhaps) stated that the public could offer write-in votes.
Colbert is known for using his show's wildly dedicated fanbase and online social media to rally support for such acts as repeatedly altering Wikipedia's entry on elephants and running for president. And he decided to rally his fans to name the node for him.
Write-in votes for Colbert eclipsed all others, which NASA does acknowledge. But his entry falls under only the Top 10 suggestions list.
"We received more than a million entries, in large part because social media Web sites and television programs, such as 'The Colbert Report,' took an interest. This spread overall awareness of the International Space Station," Bill Gerstenmaier, associate administrator for space operations at NASA headquarters, said in a statement.
"I certainly hope NASA does the right thing," Colbert has said. "Just kidding, I hope they name it after me."
According to NASA, Node 3 is a "pressurized module that will provide room for many of the space station's life support systems." Those include oxygen generation, temperature and pressure controls, oh-so delightful urine reclamation, and shower and toilet facilities. Node 3 is set to launch in late 2009.
Considering NASA has chosen to unveil the name on Colbert's show, there must be some twist to it all. Comedy Central itself is playing with the idea that NASA will name a space toilet for Colbert.
Natalie Weinstein is an associate editor who works out of Austin, Texas. She spent a decade as a reporter and editor in the newspaper industry before joining the CNET News staff in 2000. E-mail Natalie. 




MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Seriously though don't name the toilet after him... look what happened to Prince John of Rotthinham.
Can you tell i voted for Gaia? XD
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
No. We need to expand beyond this rock. The sooner the better. If not to expand, then to survive at all. NASA and nanotech efforts are the most important endeavors we have.
It's a little bit easier to just clean up, explore, and protect our damn sphere.
Do research next time. Here's a non-exhaustive list of 50 things that NASA helped bring to our world through its research: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/50-years-50-giant-leaps-how-nasa-rocked-our-world-879377.html
Don't run your mouth without thinking first. There are plenty of things to come out of NASA other than pictures of space.
This has nothing to do with finding a new place to live. Better fuel efficiency (better almost anything efficiency... if something can be rated in terms of efficiency, NASA can probably make it more efficient... life-support systems, recycling systems, etc.), better and safer building materials, safer travel on both land and in the air, renewable energy (NASA puts money into solar power, the sun powers their little toys out there and they want to get the most out of it).
How can anyone with half a brain not realize that there is so much to gain from NASA?
Still, NASA needs to stay, just the management teams need to be fired.
I'm still unconvinced we need to pour such a massive amount of money into NASA every year. Those 50 innovations are interesting, but please think about what NASA's budget is, and if innovations like that can come from a non-space organization.
I like the Colbert Show, but as he has done little more than make a mockery of the organization, and not contributed more than satirized publicity to it, he simply does not deserve naming rights. If someone famous, that did not provide direct contribution to the agency's goals or success, deserved such rights, I would think Gene Roddenberry, or George Lucus, or Jules Verne would certainly be more appropriate.
The name Serenity falls inline with the other module's names, so does Tranquility, of which both you might expect to achieve after either relieving yourself, or getting a good dose of oxygen in space (does that satisfy your desire for humor CN?). A toilet named after Colbert, is quite appropriate, provided he agrees with such, that much he does deserve for this antic.
- by jmcconnor April 14, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
- Flame on, flamers...flame on.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(30 Comments)SERENITY! ROCKS!!!