Advocates for blind protest loss of Kindle's voice function
Supporters of the blind protest the Authors Guild for objecting to the Kindle 2's text-to-speech function.
(Credit: Michael Adolph)The controversy regarding the text-to-speech function offered by Amazon.com's Kindle 2 digital book reader appears to be heating up again.
Groups advocating for the blind and reading disabled on Tuesday held a protest at the Manhattan offices of the Authors Guild. The guild was very vocal in opposing the text-to-speech technology in the Kindle. The group, which represents 4,000 authors, argued that the Kindle infringes on copyright and could hurt audio book sales.
The whole debate seemed to be over in February when . The Web's largest retailer said it had decided to enable publishers with the power to disable Kindle's text-to-speech function on a per-title basis.
Text-to-speech enables computers to read text in a lifelike voice.
The protest of 150 and 250 participants, according to reports, was held "in hopes to reverse the Guild's threat to disable text-to-speech from e-books for the Kindle 2," according to a statement from the National Federation of the Blind (NFB).
Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild, said his organization came up with a plan that would have given the blind and visually impaired access to the Kindle's voice function regardless of whether publishers chose to disable the technology.
"Authors want everyone to read their books," Aiken said. "We've been strongly supportive of the rights of the blind and disabled to obtain books...We know how to balance the interests, to make sure there is special access to books for people who need it but still protect markets that authors depend on. Audio-books is one of those markets."
The NFB rejected the guild's proposal calling it "burdensome" for the blind to prove their disability or "pay extra for the text-to-speech version."
Greg Sandoval covers media and digital entertainment for CNET News. He is a former reporter for The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. E-mail Greg, or follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/sandoCNET. 




Should we ask Congress to criminalize reading a favorite book to grandparents by the fireside? That's also text-to-speech.
I'll show proof of blindness, but I guess that will take months also. I'll probable have to pay extra too for some filing fee or something, or pay extra for a "blind kindle" that will I'm sure let the world know I'm blind when I go to use it.
Thank God I didn't have to pay extra, or have to get a doctors prescription for the zoom function on my keyboard, or do I have to pay the Authors Guild for that too, since it's a large text version.
Now if someone would make a cell phone for blind people we might get to enjoy the 21st century.
Reading "robot" on kindle is not as good as human voice, but let's be honest - it will be in next few years.
Personally, I think there should be 2 pricing levels - with and without added audio. How hard is that?
I thought they should have worked with Amazon -- always play the first chapter of every book in audiobook format (where audiobook exists for sale), remaining chapters in regular Kindle voice. Probably sell a lot of audiobooks.
If you want to ead a book read it, dont listen to a tape. If ur blind lern braile or brail or brale whatever it is youll have a much better experience by interpreting the words in your mind, than by listening to someone reading it.
And they are not only bought by and listened to by the blind.
- by kristianek April 9, 2009 6:19 AM PDT
- The Reading Rights Coalition has set up an on-line petition to urge the Authors Guild and Amazon to reverse course. Please read, sign, and pass along the petition below to all your friends and family: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/We-Want-To-Read
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)