• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
March 4, 2009 6:00 AM PST

Start-up offers alternative to subscription TV

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 26 comments
Share
(Credit: ZillionTV)

A new company called ZillionTV says it will soon introduce a new service that will enable cable and satellite subscribers to cut the cord and get subscription-free movies and TV shows right on their TVs from the Internet.

The company, which officially launched on Wednesday, has struck deals with some major Hollywood movie studios and TV networks, including Disney, 20th Century Fox Television, NBC Universal, Sony Pictures, and Warner Bros. Digital Distribution.

The plan is to offer streaming movies and TV shows directly to TVs using a broadband connection. The company has created a small piece of hardware it calls a Z-bar, which provides the connection between the TV and the Internet via an Ethernet cable or Wi-Fi. The Z-bar also acts as a receiver for the company's unique remote control, which works a lot like a laser pointer and uses sensing technology to navigate through the content menu on the TV screen.

The back side of the Z-bar shows the connections to the TV and the Internet.

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET )

The ZillionTV service, which is currently being beta tested, will only be offered through an Internet service provider. It will be commercially available starting in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Unlike some other Internet-to-TV services, such as Netflix's movie rental service, ZillionTV does not require a subscription. It also doesn't require users to buy an expensive box, such as Microsoft's Xbox 360, Apple's AppleTV, or even Roku's $99 digital video player. Instead, for a nominal activation fee of less than $50, users will get the Z-bar and remote. And then they will be able to view up to 15,000 titles of TV shows and movies through the service without having to sign up for a monthly subscription.

Users will choose one of three options for viewing the content. They can either pay a small rental fee for the movie or episode they want to view without commercials; they can "buy to own" the content, or they can view the video for free by watching targeted advertising.

For those opting to watch the movie or TV show with advertising, the ads will be short. And the advertising will be played before and after feature films and will not interrupt the movie. Advertising in TV shows will fit with natural breaks, but viewers will likely see 50 percent fewer advertisements than what they currently see on broadcast television, the company said.

ZillionTV viewers will also pre-select the advertising categories they are most interested in, so the ads they see will be targeted to their personal interests.

Eventually, ZillionTV also hopes to offer an interactive commerce component to the service. And viewers will be able to purchase products directly from their TVs.

Additionally, ZillionTV plans to offer a loyalty program, rewarding viewers for simply watching programming and interacting with advertising from categories they've personally selected.

The credit card giant Visa is working with ZillionTV on the payment and rewards program. Visa, and the movie studios and TV networks that ZillionTV has already signed on to its service are also investors in the company.

While the ZillionTV service sounds like it could have great promise, it has a long way to go before it can truly become a cable or satellite TV replacement. For one thing, 15,000 movie and TV titles may sound like a lot, but it's only a fraction or what other services such as Amazon Video on Demand offers. Amazon currently offers 40,000 titles. ZillionTV also won't initially offer live TV, such as sports, which is key for many cable and satellite TV subscribers.

But Patrick Gauthier, senior vice president of marketing and strategy for ZillionTV, says that more content is coming. And eventually, the company hopes that its service, which will be completely ad-supported or transactional-based, will offer all the same content and more than what current satellite and cable subscription services offer today.

"People are tired of paying for content that they don't use," Gauthier said. "They don't want TV by appointment or TV by bundling. We will offer them another way to view TV while also offering content owners and advertisers new ways to monetize their content."

But what's strange about ZillionTV's business model is that it plans to sell its service through broadband service providers, many of which also happen to sell their own subscription TV services. Won't these service providers see ZillionTV as a threat?

The ZillionTV menu can be navigated using a remote control that acts like a laser pointer to select movies or TV shows for viewing.

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET )

Gauthier explains that there are plenty of incentives for these providers to work with ZillionTV. Not only will the service require higher broadband speeds, which will generate revenue for these companies, but Gauthier said ZillionTV also plans to share the advertising and transactional revenue from the content directly with the broadband providers.

In exchange, ZillionTV will get dedicated bandwidth to deliver its service to ensure the best quality. In this way, ZillionTV will differ from other "over the top" online video services, such as Hulu.com, Netflix's online service, or Amazon's Video on Demand service. These services, which use the public Internet, can be affected by network congestion. But Gauthier said ZillionTV is offering the service through broadband providers to ensure that they are given dedicated amounts of bandwidth to ensure excellent service quality.

So what's the catch? At this point, ZillionTV needs to round out its content offering and sign up service providers. Even though the company sounds like it's off to a good start, these pieces of the puzzle will not be easy to fit together.

Gauthier said the company is in talks with all major broadband providers in the U.S., but he wouldn't divulge which ones it's working with. My guess is that big players, such as Verizon or Comcast, will likely reject ZillionTV.

Verizon is spending billions of dollars to build its Fios TV service. And Comcast has already said publicly that it is working directly with content owners to start rolling out an online video-on-demand service later this year. A Comcast spokeswoman said it's still too early to say how the service will work, but at least initially, it will likely be offered as an extension of Comcast's subscription TV service and not as a replacement service.

As the U.S. sinks deeper into a recession, ZillionTV's service could offer consumers already considering cutting the subscription TV cord an alternative. But it seems like every week, someone is announcing a new option for bringing Web video to the TV. It should be an interesting market to watch over the next couple of years, so stay tuned. I'll be following it.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Amazon to open bricks-and-mortar stores?
Tarantino's cheerily crazy Japanese cell phone ad
@Uh-oh: Twoddler lets toddlers send tweets
DARPA's giant red balloons officially at large
Iran Internet access down pre-protests, report says
MediaNet could power the online music revolution
Sources: Apple wants technology from struggling Lala
Apple in 'advanced' acquisition talks with Lala
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (26 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by midoshi March 4, 2009 6:47 AM PST
Its very interesting to see webTV's progress with more and more TV networks trying to reach the masses using broadband internet. I think that broadband is to stay for a long time with Verizon's FIOS and competing cable MSOs Docsis 3.0 Technologies which would enable HD TV shows as well. Cost would be an important factor for High Speed services and time would tell how MSOs would deal with this aspect.

I love hulu.com which I use for the shows that I am not able to watch since they broadcast at the same time. This gives an alternative to record a show. Most of the shows that I like to watch are available online on hulu.
Reply to this comment
by NErancher March 4, 2009 7:05 AM PST
Nice, now if they could get real broadband to rural America, I could take advantage of these "neat" things. Something besides $49.95, 7.5GB monthly limit, traffic shaping, high latency, 512Kbps satellite.
Reply to this comment
by regulator1956 March 4, 2009 2:53 PM PST
They're trying, but you want to pay < $49.95 / month for something that may cost $10,000 or $25,000 per subscriber. Unless Federal pork pays for it, good luck.
by James Anderson Merritt March 4, 2009 7:19 AM PST
Will DSL count as "broadband"? If AT&T started offering this service, that would be a reason for sticking with them or bumping to the next higher bandwidth tier, I suppose.
Reply to this comment
by shotgunhsane March 4, 2009 7:42 AM PST
Yes DSL counts as broadband. AT&T is working on their own version of broadband tv called U-Verse. Verizon's Fios is similar. Neither of these service is widely available yet, just in particular neighborhoods in large cities.
by celticbrewer March 5, 2009 6:15 AM PST
why wouldn't DSL count as broadband? I switched from cable to dsl and It's faster, cheaper, and more reliable.

My friend has u-verse. He lives on an almost-busy road in a very rural town. I'm not sure where you get that "only in large cities" exception. It is, however, mainly for TV. Most U-verse broadband speeds are the same as DSL at the same price.... EXCEPT for the 10MBps service which is so astronomically priced, no average person can afford it.
by Fordry04 March 8, 2009 12:39 PM PDT
@ Celtic, While i don't doubt that your experience with DSL has been better than Cable. Throughout most of the country though, Cable torches DSL. Where i live, the slowest Cable offering is 12Mbps and the fastest DSL offering is 1.5Mbps. And for those that live closer to town, the fastest DSL anyone in my area can get is 7Mbps, while the fastest Cable connection you can get around here is 50Mbps.
by etarfdc March 4, 2009 7:42 AM PST
If they add free live TV to this, it will be an excellent and worthwhile expense. Think about it - a nominal activation fee, a per-download fee for purchased or rented content, and then the remaining revenue from advertising during live TV and free rentals. If only the broadband companies could join us in 2009 and fix their outdated business model (and infrastructure).
Reply to this comment
by regulator1956 March 4, 2009 2:54 PM PST
Depending on where you live, free live TV is shooting through your body right now. Howabout putting up an antenna?
by biznatch11 March 4, 2009 8:16 AM PST
This is a great idea, I just wonder if the quality will be the same as TV (maybe for SD, but I doubt they will be able to stream HD, which will turn off a lot of people), and I wonder how they will deal with bandwidth caps, although if this is being offered through an ISP perhaps the ISP will not count data for this service in their caps.
Reply to this comment
by celticbrewer March 5, 2009 6:17 AM PST
Agreed- there's no mention of HD in the article. I definitely wouldn't abandon HDTV even if the same content was free through Zillion or something else (Hulu, etc..)
by renGek March 5, 2009 3:55 PM PST
I'm guessing thats why they are working in conjunction with an ISP so that they can adjust the bandwidth cap for tv programming. And there is no reason why they can't stream HD. Whats the difference? We're talking about streaming something 1024x768 vs 600x400. Technically its just the file size. It doesn't affect hardware unless your tv can't handle it.
by abundantsnotbob March 5, 2009 6:52 PM PST
There's an HDMI port on the back, so I would guess that it does HD.
by biznatch11 May 13, 2009 1:37 PM PDT
renGek said "...streaming something 1024x768 vs 600x400..."

HD would be 1080x1920=~2.1 million pixels or 720x1280=~0.9 million pixels, while SD is generally 480x640=~0.3 million pixels. So an HD stream will be about 3-7 times the bandwidth as SD.
by stramme March 4, 2009 9:37 AM PST
This does sound good, but to me to biggest drawback will be that you have to get this service through your internet provider. That will eliminate this option for many of us on major providers like Verizon and Comcast - who will not likely partner with ZillionTV to provide this service. They have there own major internet based offerings and would not be smart to "host" the competition on their own networks. If ZillionTV had an alternate subscription method (public internet) then everyone could try - but I guess that would go against their current business model. But I could be wrong about the big internet providers. You just never know...
Reply to this comment
by Eludium-Q36 March 4, 2009 11:57 AM PST
We're in that weird period of transitional technologies, as when people went from radio to tv in the '40s/'50s. It's that way with tv and the internet now, and we're just going to have to wade through this morass for another 20 years till televised entertainment is fully internet-delivered with what ever attendant costs there are to that.
Reply to this comment
by keepntabs March 4, 2009 2:33 PM PST
I gave up subscription TV in 2007, and use my HTPC hooked up to my television and almost all of my "television" programming is streamed content from various Internet sites. I do watch local over the air channels via an antenna, and can record them with the computer's DVR. Also, I subscribe to Neflix, and frequently use the Watch Instantly feature that streams movies and tv programs. It seems that the ultimate business model of ZillionTV is to create another subscription service; just substituting cable/dish for Internet TV.
Reply to this comment
by ofmyony March 8, 2009 9:33 AM PDT
This box is hopefully going to do what Apple Tv failed to accomplish for most users is bring on the couch surfing to home theaters. I loath using a mouse and keyboard to stream media to my HD Television. It is a crude way to manage content from across the room. Apple Tv did one thing right it allowed users the ability to stream their media from their couch in a easy viewable menu. However it lacked the ability to stream most free online content because of it's closed ecosystem.

This will work if it gives you the ability to stream you content on the computer plus receive all the free content online. Imagine the Roku box combined with Apple TV, Boxee and Tivo. If they do it right and let free content be free this will revolutionize how all internet subscribers view content. The key feature is that it cannot be locked down and must be open to stream all content. I will gladly welcome advertisers and give them my interest if they give me a great device to allow me to turn my PC into a actual Home Theater. Many have tried but no one seems to really get it yet. I am hopeful Zillion Tv is the answer.
by uolawstudent March 5, 2009 10:01 AM PST
This sounds interesting, but I question whether it will really be viable. I cut my satellite provider over a year ago and now watch TV via the internet. I pay $8.99 for Netflix, occasionally purchase from Amazon video on demand, and have my bookmark bar filled with other "channels" such as Fancast, network sites, etc.. I run an audio cable to my stereo from my computer and a video cable to my Polaroid hard drive recorder ($200 from Walmart.com and I swapped the 80 GB hard drive for a 250 GB one), which is connected to my TV. I can pause, record, etc. just like any DVR without any monthly fee. The interesting thing is I have found is it is getting very hard to find hard drive recorders on the market. Something appears to be stifling hard drive recorder prevalence in the market.
Reply to this comment
by tcr071 March 5, 2009 10:19 AM PST
Already cut the subscription cord. As soon as the economy started going to **** I decided to cut back heavily on the spending. Saved almost $500 from cancelling DirecTV, another $200 from lowering my internet speed, $300 from canceling home phone and adding minutes to my cell, $800 from not turning on the heater or air conditioner since November. I have a job, I have money, but my savings account is growing rapidly because I am preparing for the worst. The economy is going to get much worse before it gets better and I'll be ready. If it doesn't get worse, well, I'll have $10,000 I saved.

You learn to live without subscription TV after a couple of weeks. The air broadcasts come in fine at 720p and you just watch the major networks. Everything that you might have missed about having a DVR can be solved with Hulu or any other website on the internet.
Reply to this comment
by molotov March 6, 2009 8:58 AM PST
Absolutely. The technology allows us to save money. Why buy large TV and a PC? Buy a nice PC with a big screen and stream your entertainment through the internet. No TV = No Cable. Younger people are equiped better to cope with no TV situation; we never really watched it in the dorm rooms and are not really in the habit post-college.
Landline home phones? Does not exist for us. At the most we subscribe through T-Mobile or Vongae for $10 or $25, respectively, to have VOIP. Those that are under 30 and with landlines are old-fashioned. They argue; what if when the power does shut off every 3 years or so and I need to call my mom? Having grown up in NYC with reliable source of electricity - I do not have those qualms.
by randy922 April 11, 2009 2:26 AM PDT
Land Line users , old fashioned?? I just got rid of my cell phones, 4 of them, and got a new land line..Cost = $205 per month for unlimited text and minutes for cell phones..Cost = $20/ month unlimited time, no long distance charges , for land line, thru Mid Continent Cable supplier...Now I have , Land Line, Cable TV and High Speed Cable for $138 / month..PLUS, I am not available 24/7 for stupid phone calls...thank you very much..
by Renegade Knight March 5, 2009 11:56 AM PST
This has potential. My main issue on offerings so far has been the library. Hulu always has the wrong season of a show. Netflix is hit and miss (mostly miss) on what's available online but at least they will send a DVD of what they don't have for online watching.

This is where Netflix needs to go next.
Reply to this comment
by MrMurder March 8, 2009 7:43 AM PDT
Well, I like the concept of Zillion TV. But I like live TV much better.
Reply to this comment
by blusky08 March 8, 2009 8:30 AM PDT
People are jumping ship on the cable/satellite providers in droves. My guess is that these companies are going to respond soon by offering ala carte and/or more channels for less $$ and vastly increasing their VOD libraries.

They have the infrastructure, so IF they adapt to the market then all these downloading services will become niche or even bite the dust. .
Reply to this comment
by dmorgen518 March 8, 2009 10:46 AM PDT
So will it work like Hulu for your TV? And will the episodes be posted while or after they are aired? Either way, seems pretty cool, i haven't regularly sat down and watched TV in about two years, ever since you could watch full episodes online.
Reply to this comment
(26 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right