February 5, 2009 4:06 PM PST

FCC hammers out DTV delay details

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 23 comments
DTV

The Federal Communications Commission helped clarify Thursday how it will handle requests from broadcasters to turn off their analog TV signals before the new June 12 deadline.

Acting FCC Chairman Michael Copps said during an open meeting that the agency would carefully evaluate which stations can turn off their analog signals before the June 12 deadline. The FCC will likely allow some stations to make the switch early, but it will try to ensure that not every station in a community makes the switch early, leaving unprepared viewers with no access to over-the-air TV.

"We reserve the right to deny those requests if we find that it would not serve the public interest or if it would frustrate Congress' goal of giving consumers adequate time to prepare," Copps said.

Copps also said during the meeting that the major broadcast networks, including ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC/Telemundo, have all agreed that their owned and operated stations would continue to broadcast in analog until the new DTV transition date of June 12.

Earlier this week, the House of Representatives passed a bill that moves the deadline for transitioning TV broadcast from analog to digital from February 17 to June 12. The Senate has also passed a bill pushing the date of the transition back to June 12. President Obama is expected to sign it into law shortly. As part of a compromise to get the bills through Congress, lawmakers added a provision that allows broadcasters to transition to all-digital broadcasts early if they get permission from the FCC.

Copps said Thursday that TV stations must notify the FCC by Monday February 9, if they plan to turn off their analog TV signal on February 17.

Stations have been preparing to cut off their analog broadcasts for the February 17 deadline for months. Leaving the analog signals on will likely cost them more money as they are required to pay for the additional electricity and facility costs of running multiple transmitters. Most stations have already been airing some programming in digital.

Congress passed the new legislation to delay the deadline, because legislators and consumer advocates were concerned that 20 million people, most of whom are poor, elderly, and living in rural parts of the country, were not prepared for the transition after the government ran out of the $40 coupons it was issuing to help defray the cost of the converter boxes necessary to allow older TVs to get digital signals. There have also been reports that many consumers, who have already gotten converter boxes, are not able to connect them properly to their TVs.

The legislation delays the mandated switchover to all digital broadcasts another four months. Chairman Copps said he hopes that the additional time could be used to improve government outreach to help prepare for the transition.

An additional $650,000 is expected to be granted through the government's economic stimulus bill to complete the funding of the coupon program.

While the delay will give the government and other organizations more time to help prepare consumers, it could also confuse consumers who have already heard of the February 17 deadline. What's more with some broadcasters continuing to broadcast their analog signals and others switching to digital, some consumers could still lose access to some TV stations before they are ready.

National Association of Broadcasters said it will begin airing revised viewer alerts with the new date.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Time Warner Cable shows subscribers how to cut cord
Want to see Google's new phone on YouTube?
AT&T cuts Tiger Woods
Online holiday sales hit $27 billion
Amazon touts top products of 2009
Teen Muziic founder chastised by Vevo
Microsoft, Yahoo help keep India away from porn?
Zuckerberg spends Christmas dethroning Google
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by kc6hur February 5, 2009 5:46 PM PST
You want economic stimulus? Find out where the 6.5 Million households are, hire a bunch of the out of work people to go install antennas and converter boxes at these households. This'll get everyone on the digital bandwagon and provide jobs for a bunch of those needing jobs. Better than giving it to the banks who will use it to pay bonuses.
Reply to this comment
by timber2005 February 5, 2009 7:11 PM PST
+1, I agree with your idea.
by sanenazok February 5, 2009 7:53 PM PST
It's even better since nobody needs a new antenna just a converter box for crying out loud!
by biffhenerson February 6, 2009 8:13 AM PST
Search high and low, I betting that the 6.5 Million do not exist.
by nervous_cat February 6, 2009 10:40 AM PST
How about getting local ham radio operators to volunteer in their local communities to help those folks with the DTV transition? Hams can buy the convertor boxes for them, help set them up to analog TVs, and troubleshoot reception problems. Kind of like Habitat for Humanity - except they would go up on rooftops for a different reason - to install new antennas (or add preamps on exisiting ones to boost reception) for seniors and poor folks who can't do it themselves. Hams are naturals for this kind of job since they have their own Ham Radio antennas and towers to maintain. There aren't a lot of professional TV antenna installers around these days, and unskilled people hired to go up on roofs and suffer a roof related accident could sue the homeowner. Digital Television for Humanity!
by jscott418 February 5, 2009 6:29 PM PST
Kudos to those stations sticking with the February 17th date. The government love's to delay anything it can. Some people will always whine and cry foul that they cannot afford something. $40 for a converter is nothing. We have had years to save up for a box. What have these people been doing?
If you cannot afford one, I guess you will just have to wait until the government can send out a coupon to you. I sympathize with the smaller market stations who have spent a lot of money (more then $40) running two different transmitters for a while now waiting for the public and government to get a clue. After all it was the government who mandated this. It was not the TV stations ideal. Oh you know I never heard too many complaints when we went to LCD and plasma screens that costs three times as much as the CRT's the replaced. Look people if $40 is too much for you, then go back to radio or read a book.
Reply to this comment
by tech_crazy February 5, 2009 6:55 PM PST
You expect people to pay $40 for something which used to be free and when the government is going to make more money by selling the airwaves than it would pay for the converter coupons? The expired coupons should have been replaced with newer ones or better yet there should not have had an expiration date to begin with.
by sanenazok February 6, 2009 5:54 AM PST
@tech_crazy: did the expired coupons come expired? If someone didn't use them in time, it's their darn fault. An expiration date makes a government program easier to mange since there's a known date by which the card data may be purged.

The boxes were never "free." Either you signed up for the coupon and got it or you didn't. By the way, the converter program completely artificially hiked the price of the boxes. I could use a few more for other sets I own, but I'm waiting for the prices to come down from $40 to something approaching the $5 cost of these things. After the "chaos" of the transition is over, these boxes will be sold for $20 max.
by paulsecic February 6, 2009 9:37 AM PST
Joe 6 pack needs to to Wallmart & buy a fricken new TV. GEEZ!!!!
by kc6hur February 5, 2009 8:12 PM PST
Speaking of delays, whatever happened to "Go Metric?"
Reply to this comment
by nervous_cat February 6, 2009 10:42 AM PST
That died in the Ford Administration. I remember learning the metric system in elementary school in 1975.
by aka_tripleB February 6, 2009 12:31 AM PST
What should have been done instead of delaying the switch is that the government should have issued the money that will be spent because of the delay and used it to fund the current number of coupon requests and used a higher priority shipping method. Then required retail stores to carry surplus of converter boxes for the next three months. Then after that, just require the stores to keep a few on-hand indefinitely.
Reply to this comment
by Stefaninafla February 6, 2009 6:29 AM PST
I say go ahead and make the switch. Not that I care about television, I would not mind if television broadcasts went belly up entirely. I do know that I am part of a small minority in that regard.
Reply to this comment
by kaibelf February 6, 2009 7:40 AM PST
This is ridiculous. How long are we going to coddle morons who can't (after TEN years of warning) get their act together? NO ONE is that underprivileged. It's pure laziness. Now these stations are going to be forced to maintain dual equipment to compensate for the hillbillies in Appalachia and some welfare families that, in ALL this time, were too burdened to pick up a phone and arrange for things. And for what? So that they can avoid missing an episode of Jerry Springer?
Reply to this comment
by Norman Moore February 6, 2009 9:16 AM PST
I don't think there is any area that can not receive one or more radio stations so it is bullcrap to be worried that anyone will be left uninformed if the DTV transtion had occured as scheduled. As it was there was a two year period leading up to the change and most major TV stations have been sending out digital simulcasts for at least a year now. If they aren't going to do it on schedule then cancel the entire thing and tell the people, broadcasters and viewers, who already have done their due diligence that they are being stiffed for being on top of things. That should go over real good!

Why don't they worry about high speed internet. I live in a major city (Los Angeles) and my DSL is 324 up and 268 down. Best I can get because any higher speed and it goes unstable. In some areas of this country they get nothing except dial up, a real black eye for the nation that was once the technological beacon of the world.
Reply to this comment
by February 6, 2009 9:19 AM PST
Mark my words - the situation will be exactly the same come June. Nothing will have been accomplished by this delay.
Reply to this comment
by nervous_cat February 6, 2009 10:46 AM PST
Except a few lives may have been saved because it will avoid the possiblity that some stupid people in the snowy part of the county will climb up on a icy roof to adjust their antenna on February 18th.
by clsmithj February 6, 2009 12:41 PM PST
I don't really care about a delay. Digital TV has been here already since 2003.
Every new TV set as of 2006, both standard and high def have a digital tuner due to the FCC mandate.
I already received and redeemed my federal DTV coupon for a converter box last month, plus I have a CRT HDTV from 2005 that has a built-in digital tuner, and I have a new PCTV HD PCI card for computer so I can capture and HDTV.

The delay has no affect on me. :-) (^_^)
Reply to this comment
by rucknrun February 6, 2009 1:38 PM PST
This is such a joke. Just do it already!!
Reply to this comment
by February 6, 2009 3:07 PM PST
Hams in many areas are already helping out with DTV conversion issues, but there's limits to how much we can do.

That said, there's no reason why you need to be up on roofs; DTV converters use your existing antenna, and if it was good enough for analog TV it'll work for DTV. In my experience you actually do better with DTV than you did with ATV, although your mileage will vary.

Setting up a DTV box is no more complicated than setting up a VCR; the problem is actually getting the DTV boxes into the hands of people who need them.
Reply to this comment
by nowhearthis February 7, 2009 6:37 PM PST
If the 6.5M people are not ready for the digital transition now, guess what they will NOT be ready in June. So we'll be looking at another delay huh! This is one big government farce - looks like the lobbyist have done another excellent job.
Reply to this comment
by Tvelo February 7, 2009 10:22 PM PST
I work in operations at a small market station in MO. I'm hoping we get the go ahead to shut off the analog side. Our station has planned carefully for this, and have already allocated the space that the transmitters occupy for other purposes. We broadcast our local programming and most of our syndicated programming in HD, so we've been ready to swing over for a long time now. All this is doing is hurting our budget and jeopardizing jobs.
Reply to this comment
by mpitogo February 8, 2009 7:38 PM PST
6.5 million people not ready will mean 54,166 per day will have to go out and get coupons and converters between now and then. Get on with it and just stick to the original date.
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right