December 1, 2008 4:00 AM PST

What you need to know about the digital TV switch

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 19 comments

Television as we know is about to change drastically in the U.S. in February when broadcasters switch solely to transmitting digital signals. And even though there are many benefits to this transition, there are also a few downsides.

Here's the lowdown on what you can expect from the new digital TV service, the good, the bad, and the ugly.

First, let's start with the good. On February 17, broadcasters throughout the country will flip a switch turning off their old analog TV transmitters, and they will begin transmitting their TV signals only in digital format. Over 90 percent of TV stations today already broadcast both analog and digital stations, which means that consumers don't have to wait until February to test and tweak their TVs to get digital TV.

For the most part, the switch to digital TV will benefit all Americans, regardless of whether they watch over-the-air TV.

Digital signals use wireless spectrum much more efficiently than analog signals, which is why the government mandated the switch in the first place. Congress set the February 17, 2009, deadline so that the government could free up wasted spectrum so that it could be used to build more robust emergency wireless networks, as well as provide the private sector with more spectrum that could be used to develop new wireless broadband services. The government has already auctioned off most of the unused spectrum. And after February, service providers who won licenses in those auctions will be able to get to work building their next-generation wireless networks.

For over-the-air TV viewers, the switch to digital also has many benefits, including sharper pictures, better sound quality, and more content. Using analog signals, broadcasters can only transmit one channel of content at a time. But with digital signals, broadcasters can transmit multiple channels at once. In fact, many broadcasters have already launched three or four separate digital channels, each carrying programming of interest to diverse communities. And because there is more bandwidth available, broadcasters are also transmitting some of these channels in high-definition.

In some cases if consumers have a high-definition TV, they'll even be able to get some HD channels for free. For example, all the major networks--ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC--transmit some shows over the air in HD. This means that many consumers will be able to access HD content without subscribing to a pricey cable package.

"Digital broadcast will vastly improve free TV viewing," said Graham Jones, the director of communications engineering for the science and technology department of the National Association of Broadcasters. "All the networks are broadcasting in HD, and viewers can receive it for nothing. They don't have to pay a cent. And with modern receivers and antennas, reception is very solid."

Better for many, not all
But with the good, also comes some bad. Unfortunately, not everyone in every corner of the U.S. will experience all the great benefits of digital TV. Because analog signals transmit over longer distances than digital signals, some over-the-air viewers living in rural areas may find that they do not get all the same channels they were able to when they received analog TV.

This scenario is mostly true for people who already receive weak analog TV signals. For example, if someone generally gets a snowy or fuzzy picture using an antenna to receive an analog TV signal, there's a good chance that the viewer won't be able to receive the digital signal at all.

"Digital broadcast will vastly improve free TV viewing. All the networks are broadcasting in HD, and viewers can receive it for nothing. They don't have to pay a cent. And with modern receivers and antennas, reception is very solid."
--Graham Jones, National Association of Broadcasters

"Some people may have been able to put up with a poor analog signal, because the receiver still received the transmission, albeit in a fuzzy form," Jones said. "But if a digital signal is weak, the receiver can't decode it, and the transmission stops, which means people simply get a blank screen."

This is exactly what happened to some viewers in Wilmington, N.C., when the Federal Communications Commission and local broadcasters tested turning off their analog signals earlier this year.

Broadcasters have tried to compensate for this issue by boosting transmission power, but Jones said because digital and analog signals are broadcast at different frequencies it may be difficult to replicate broadcasts exactly, which means some people may be left without some channels they could have received with analog transmissions.

The issues won't be limited to rural consumers. Some city dwellers may also have trouble receiving certain channels. Even though people living in a city such as New York or Chicago will likely be able to receive strong digital broadcast signals, they could fall victim to other issues that preclude them from receiving certain channels further up the dial. The reason is simple. Channels broadcast at higher frequencies don't go around buildings or through walls as easily, and this could disrupt transmission.

Consumers may have to do a little research
But consumers shouldn't throw their hands up in defeat too quickly. With a little investigation and a few extra dollars spent on new equipment, even viewers in some challenging geographies could still receive a good quality digital TV experience.

So what's a consumer to do? First, consumers who rely on over-the-air broadcasts need to determine whether they want to keep their old analog TVs or invest in new digital or high-definition TVs. If a consumer keeps his old analog TV, the government is offering $40 coupons to help defray the cost of buying a digital converter box, which attaches to the TV and costs about $60. These boxes essentially turn an old TV into one that can view digital signals. If he is already getting a good analog signal, he'll likely be able to keep the same antenna for the digital service. But if he was already getting a poor signal, Jones recommends upgrading to a better antenna.

But Jones also emphasizes that to get the best digital TV experience consumers should buy a new digital or high-definition TV. As of March 1, 2007, all television reception devices, which includes TVs, VCRs, and DVRs, sold in the U.S. have been required by law to contain a digital tuner. And with smaller HDTVs selling for as little as $400 or $500, high definition has also become an affordable feature.

But even with a new digital TV, Jones said that consumers will still need an antenna to receive the over-the-air signals. For help in determining which kind of outdoor antenna you might need, check out AntennaWeb.org. This is a Web site set up by NAB and the Consumer Electronics Association that allows consumers to enter their address and provide details about their immediate surroundings, such as how many trees or tall buildings are nearby, to help determine which type of antenna would be best.

Jones also recommends that before consumers buy a new antenna they try their old one first. Several retailers, including Best Buy, are offering workshops around the country to provide information to consumers. There is also information on the Web site DTVanswers.com.

"Broadcasters are already transmitting digital signals today. So there's no reason for people to wait until February to make their equipment tweaks and start benefiting from digital."
--Jones, National Association of Broadcasters

And Jones suggests that consumers call their local broadcast stations directly to figure out in which direction they should point their antenna for the best reception. Local broadcasters will also be able to provide information about whether consumers are even within range to receive the new digital signal.

"There are some 1,700 broadcasters in the U.S.," Jones said. "The local stations will know better than we will how to help viewers in their specific region. So if people have questions, they should call their local broadcasters. And these broadcasters should be available and able to help them."

Several local stations have already set up hotlines for consumers to call. And broadcasters around the country have been "soft" testing the transition. During these tests, broadcasters turn off their analog signals. If consumers are still trying to view the channel using an analog TV, a screen will pop up where the program had been informing viewers of the deadline and how to get ready for the digital switch.

A bill passed in the U.S. Senate last week that would require some broadcasters to offer this information screen to viewers for 30 days after the February 17 deadline. The measure must still pass the House of Representatives before it becomes law. But even if it does become law, Jones said that not every broadcaster would be able to continue broadcasting the message over its analog channel, because as of that date, new spectrum holders will have access to those airwaves. Instead, he has been encouraging viewers not to wait until the deadline to test their digital TV readiness.

"Broadcasters are already transmitting digital signals today," he said. "So there's no reason for people to wait until February to make their equipment tweaks and start benefiting from digital."

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from Digital Media
China arrests thousands in Web porn crackdown
When policemen are caught looking at Web porn
Time Warner Cable shows subscribers how to cut cord
Want to see Google's new phone on YouTube?
AT&T cuts Tiger Woods
Online holiday sales hit $27 billion
Amazon touts top products of 2009
Teen Muziic founder chastised by Vevo
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by dstrauss December 1, 2008 4:53 AM PST
Please, please, please emphasize that "digital" does not mean HDTV! I know you referenced it briefly in the body of your article, but particularly for those folks who are "upgrading" to one of the new HDTV sets, this will be a major disappointment as they find that most of the content over the air, cable, or satellite is still standard definition digital...so on larger sets the screen looks only marginally better than the old analog signal, if not actually worse (as is the case with our local ABC affiliate).

Many people I talk to think they will be getting Discovery HD quality signals come February 17, and they are going to be flooding the big box stores (and government) wanting to know what is going on.
Reply to this comment
by zizzybaloobah December 1, 2008 5:42 AM PST
"Digital signals use wireless spectrum much more efficiently than analog signals, which is why the government mandated the switch in the first place." Really? Superficially that might be the reason, but we all know the government was salivating to make big money auctioning off the analog spectrum to the highest bidder.
Reply to this comment
by plarsen111 December 6, 2008 6:58 AM PST
Perhaps, but you are going to see some amazing things come forward because of this. If I remember correctly, google bought one of these spectrums? Can you imagine a device that you do not have to use the cell tower's for. No more outrageous cell phone bills.
by 3rdalbum December 1, 2008 5:44 AM PST
dstrauss: There's a lot of confusion about digital and HD, but the people who don't know the difference will not be able to tell SD from HD anyway.

Also, if you're getting a blocky digital signal, before going out and spending hundreds on a new aerial, just go and buy a new aerial cable. About $15 will get you a good one. Believe me, people buy a new TV and are ready to replace the entire aerial, which won't do a thing because their existing 20-year-old aerial cable has started to fracture. 90% of the time, a new RF cable will improve the strength and quality of the signal getting to your TV or set-top-box, to the point where you can get all the stations perfectly.
Reply to this comment
by Bill_I December 1, 2008 9:29 AM PST
One trick learned long ago. Use cable TV wire (RG-6) for antenna connections, as opposed to the smaller and cheaper RG-59 type. There is less ingress with RG-6, so what you get is the antenna pickup, and not stray signals leaking into the cable.
by Craig_W December 1, 2008 6:50 AM PST
Yes antennaweb.org is by far the best source for determining what kind of antenna is required for your viewing area. The right antenna is critical for receiving digital channels, my difficulty was receiving channels I could get in analog and now I couldn?t get the new digital ones. I found out that some digital channels are broadcasting in UHF instead of VHF (as their channel identified, digital TVs and converter boxes change this somehow). My antenna wasn?t receiving the UHF signals. Has anyone else had this problem? And if you don't already have a digital TV you will also need to choose a converter box that meets you needs http://www.ezdigitaltv.com has information on all converter boxes available.
Reply to this comment
by CITechnologies December 1, 2008 7:19 AM PST
Digital signal is only superior when it has a strong signal that is not receiving interference. I don't know how many times I have been ticked off even with digital cable because the screen went all blocky. I personally don't see SD digital to be worth spit because of signal problems and quite frankly the local stations don't have many shows that I would really care to see in HD. Discovery HD? Yes. But, I have to pay for cable to get that anyways. Newer movies on HD? (old movies really don't improve much here at all) Absolutely! But, only with a strong uninterrupted signal. Otherwise my picture hasn't really improved because instead of snow, I get colorful blocks on the screen and instead of static I get high pitched screeches as the encoder tries helplessly to provide that crisp clear multi-channel audio they keep talking about.
Reply to this comment
by Bill_I December 1, 2008 9:37 AM PST
I put a splitter on my big antenna for an analog / digital shootout. When the signal on UHF Ch 28 faded to snowy, the digital remained solid. As the signal faded to more snow, the digital went crazy, with ribbons of color and stuttering sound. My friends at CBS refer to this as 'falling off the digital cliff'.
by dmeisner01 December 1, 2008 7:52 AM PST
What does one do when the digital signal from one of my stations doesn't come through strong enough? Today I have the option of switching to the slightly-snowy analog version, but the digital signal is unwatchable when it's too weak. I have a new antenna, a new cable from the antenna (both professionally installed) and the antenna is pointed to the direction of a common antenna farm that all of my major stations use, so I'm out of the obvious fixes.

Someone told me that some of the DTV signals will be reassigned to the lower UHV frequencies after the analog switch, but I haven't read this anywhere (and it sounds like a bit of a headache for users, so I expect it's an urban myth). Has anyone else heard of this? (it may solve my problem)
Reply to this comment
by bommai December 1, 2008 8:14 AM PST
Depending on where you live, the local station may not be broadcasting the digital signal in full power. This might be because they are just tardy or may be because of a conflicting analog channel near you that needs to be first shut down on Feb 17 or they have been asked to move to a new channel on Feb 17 and they don't want to spend the money now to increase the power.

I live in Kansas City and the digitals come perfectly and I can hardly receive the analogs (snowy withstanding). Also, to other posters that are not impressed with digital TV, I am a big fan of network shows like Criminal Minds, 24, Prison Break, Heroes, etc. I watch it on my 118" screen with a 1080p projector. Most of these shows are in 1080i with Dolby Digital 5.1 and they look and sound great (not as great as Bluray but very impressive). So with the right setup and good local broadcasts, you can be in HD heaven.
by dk jones December 1, 2008 8:15 AM PST
the main reason i have cable (& opted for the HD package) was that i bought a 42" Sony HDTV w/ ATSC in 2005 & was only able to receive 2 of the big 4 or 5 OTA networks. my home is positioned in-line between the affiliates out going transmitters & their incoming (to the viewers) transmitters & i have a large hill, the highest point in the city, blocking the incoming signal to me. so even though i live in the center of a major metropolitan area, my OTA coverage sucked big time. i had very poor analog signal for my PBS & NBC stations & so it was non-existent on the digital side--no HDTV for me after spending $2300.00 for a TV. & let's not forget how bad analog can suck on a WS HDTV, especially if it's all stretched out.
Reply to this comment
by CITechnologies December 1, 2008 8:32 AM PST
And you wouldn't have been forced to switch TV's at all if not for the Government's greed. I understand the theater buffs wanting the best show ever. But the majority of Americans still watch their $200 TV setups not the multi-thousand dollar setups. I love my movies in high def and I love my HDTV. I also don't mind watching a standard tv show show or news broadcast in SD. There just isn't much need. TV shows don't really pack much punch. I love shows like LOST and the Sopranos. But lets face it....when Will and Grace comes on, do you really need HD. Let's save that for the BlueRay players so that the mass public isn't forced to switch for the very small population (comparatively) of theater buffs.
by JoshMiller79 December 1, 2008 8:27 AM PST
I agree with the first commenter about Digital is not HD.

Also as an engineer for a broadcast television station, I am seriously considering taking a week off after the transition to avoid the impending flood of phone calls.

Despite all of the information around. this is most certainly still the end result problem. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRMAwXSbAnw
Reply to this comment
by willdryden December 1, 2008 8:28 AM PST
The article is wrong. Analog signals are real. Digital signals are an approximation of the analog signals and will never have the same quality. Since all TVs display a digital representation of the analog signal anyway, you should never notice the difference if you can have an outside antenna. All the people living in deed restricted areas will have a serious problem.
Reply to this comment
by clothesliner December 1, 2008 1:21 PM PST
You ar wrong. DTV is far superior to analog TV. Have you tried it?
by SantyClaus December 1, 2008 12:15 PM PST
Note too that cable companies are now starting to charge extra (or have increased their fee schedules) to cover charges by LOCAL stations for their digital signals. There are also no options to avoid those increases. First the government forces everyone to incur cost for purchasing a converter (or purchase a TV with a digital tuner) and provided no protections for the cable customers for access to these stations. I say, write your Congressman and complain about having to shoulder the burden of this change.

Merry Christmas!
Reply to this comment
by the zak December 8, 2008 4:23 AM PST
What can people do about the DTV promotion?...
whose converter box coupons expired
before they could use them?... the coupon program call center
and website issues 90 day coupons one time only.
Reply to this comment
by December 10, 2008 7:19 AM PST
One problem not covered this RAIN, if you have a rain of .3 in per hour this will cut back "attenuate" the singal level to low to be used. Now this will still be depend on the topology of the land, but it looks to me that rain will effect, 60% of users 10 miles out.
Analog is always better than Digital, if you have enough bandwith to transmit the singal, digital takes far less bandwith. Just play an LP on a good turntable the then lesson to it on a cd.
Reply to this comment
by poncho7171 April 18, 2009 9:55 PM PDT
I have a tv that is connected to a comcast cable - only Do I need a cable box in order to receive the new digital signals or should it work with just the cable line connection?
Reply to this comment
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right