Report: Police examine culpability of those who encouraged suicide
Police in Pembroke Pines, Fla., are trying to determine whether those who goaded a Florida 19-year-old to commit suicide bear any responsibility in his death, according to several reports.
"There is an active investigation," Sgt. John Gazzano of the Pembroke Pines Police Department told CNET News. He did not provide any other details.
Last week, the teenager set up a Webcam to broadcast himself taking an overdose of drugs on Web video service Justin.tv. The 12-hour ordeal was watched by hundreds of people, some who encouraged the young man to do away with himself.
"You want to kill yourself?" said one post to a message left by the teenager saying he intended to kill himself. "Do the world a favor and stop wasting our time with your mindless self pity."
Others attempted to contact police and save the young man.
This is believed to be the first suicide broadcast live to the Web from the United States. In Great Britain, a 42-year-old man hanged himself last year.
Greg Sandoval covers media and digital entertainment for CNET News. He is a former reporter for The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. E-mail Greg, or follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/sandoCNET.





Good parents can have bad kids. Bad parents can have good kids. While parents and environment can skew a personality one direction or another, they can't make it. Kids are hardwired with the basics. It's in the DNA. I used to think otherwise; that babies were personalityless blobs that parents molded into what they bacame. I was wrong.
As for your thoughts on responsiblity. Parents are responsible for raising their kids. Society meanwhile takes away more and more tools while blaming parents more and more for the results. Parental responsiblity has limits. Chiefly parenting is different from the kids own actions and choices. Parents guide, they cajole, they lay down the law. Kids make their own choices in that framework. They are not all the right choices. That's life.
Like I said, the only good that has come of this is the fact that this stain is no longer able to pollute the gene pool.
If you really are trying to assign blame for this, then you are taking the wrong path. Suicide is not manslaughter, nor is it homicide. Blame is irrelevant in such a case and should not be focused on. Focus on the time you had with the teen, focus on ways to reach out to those in similar situations, and find ways to comfort them.
According to some reports I have read recently, I cannot remember from where, it was stated that the website refused, or some less harsh term, to track down the teen and contact authorities in a timely manner. If your company is informed of something that could endanger a human life, it is my understanding that it is in your best interest to at the very least contact the proper authorities to pass it off to them.
My heart goes out to his family.
~JB
If you think about how far the internet has come in the last 10 years it makes you wonder about the next 10... the internet is a wonderful thing but managing it is going to be quite a challenge. It won't be free much longer. In the future, a dollar might be added to your taxes for adding a comment like this or 50 cents for sending an email... enjoy it while it lasts. They're probably working on email stamps right now.
Personally, I write it off as natural selection at work.
And it`s nobodys "fault"
Example: You see someone drowning in a lake. You swim out to save him, but get a cramp and drown yourself. The law doesn't force a duty on you to save a person for that very reason, and I believe it would work in this situation.
The only exception to nonfeasance is if a special relationship was created between the actors. In this case, it would be difficult to argue that as a result of the online comments during his broadcast, a special relationship was created. No one promised to take care of him, nor hinted at any care.
It's really an awful thing that this guy decided to take his own life, and it's sick people goaded him on. But liability has to be cut off somewhere, and someone half a world away provoking him should not, and will not, be held responsible. This isn't a question of fault, it is a question of whether there is a duty to protect or not.
Cleaning up the gene pool? Isn't that what Hitler was trying to do?
-
by etnav382
November 25, 2008 1:42 PM PST
- You know he had tried many times before, I actually went to the website and read his post he didnt even think it would work this time.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(33 Comments)