• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
September 6, 2008 7:33 PM PDT

Google-focused satellite enters orbit

by Jonathan Skillings

The GeoEye-1 satellite that launched into orbit Saturday is on a mission from Google.

Well, not just Google. The GeoEye-1 is part of the NextView program of the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, a dot-mil organization that, odd as it may seem, wants access to commercial satellite imagery to support its national security mission. GeoEye, the company, won its $500 million NextView contract four years ago.

Google's rocket-borne logo

Google's rocket-borne logo.

(Credit: GeoEye/ULA)

But the search titan does have the exclusive rights among online mapping sites to the GeoEye-1 images, which it will use in its Google Earth and Google Maps offerings. It even got its corporate logo emblazoned on the launch rocket, right below Boeing's.

Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page were on hand at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California for Saturday morning's launch, according to the Reuters news agency.

GeoEye said Saturday afternoon that the satellite had separated from the second stage of the Delta II rocket and was initializing its onboard systems.

The GeoEye-1 will zip around the Earth at about 4.5 miles per second, taking both color and black-and-white images from a distance of 423 miles. Its camera can distinguish objects on the ground as small as 16 inches in size, according to GeoEye. Because of U.S. licensing restrictions, Google's resolutions won't be quite that sharp.

High-resolution color images are expected later in the fall.

A GeoEye-2 satellite is scheduled for launch in 2011.

Jonathan Skillings is managing editor of CNET News, based in the Boston bureau. He's been with CNET since 2000, after a decade in tech journalism at the IDG News Service, PC Week, and an AS/400 magazine. He's also been a soldier and a schoolteacher. E-mail Jon.
Recent posts from Digital Media
New Verizon ad pushes Droid's manly side
Judge bans Twitter from court
EA picks up Playfish for social gaming push
Google may lose WSJ, other News Corp. sites
GE, Comcast reportedly value NBCU at $30 billion
New preorders of Nook get later shipping date
Judge halts BlueBeat's sale of Beatles tunes
EMI to offer instant concert recordings
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Buyer0 September 6, 2008 11:47 PM PDT
Does anyone else see the "Big Google Brother" as the growing camel in the tent? Since Google made the statement that "privacy no longer exists", they have been on a path to make the old Soviet Union look tame. It may soon be too late to put the genie (Google) back into the bottle.
Reply to this comment
by eccles1214 September 7, 2008 12:34 AM PDT
I stopped using Google on a regular basis several years ago; too creepy. Yes, they are not alone in their "Big Brother"-ish behavior, but they are certainly the largest and most aggressive. I now use smaller search engines, anonymous browsing, and anonymous redirections. So far the strategy is working: When I do use Google to find my name, for example, I can only find others with my name, those so called Dopplegangers. I don't like to call them Googlegangers, since they also show up in search engines other than Google.

Having their names on a spy satelite is so fitting for a company that continues to flaunt the line between good and evil.

And what is this about forming an OpenSocial Foundation to woo friends? What friends? Who would want to be friends with the next hegemonic tech giant after that other giant, Microsoft. I'm no Microsoftie, and I'm no Googler either.

Google?, yuck.
Reply to this comment
by napacab September 7, 2008 9:00 AM PDT
You need to eliminate the following to truly be anonymous: credit cards, cell phone, home phone, health insurance (and do not use doctors who take health insurance). Cash only and snail mail for communications, though in person in a closed sound proof environment is best. No foreign travel. No auto insurance or drivers license.

Good luck with that.
by eee444 September 7, 2008 1:35 AM PDT
Yes, Google grows up, but is it that bad? It is better the power to be in civilized hands instead of being in some really bad hands ruled by minds sharing really bad conceptions about how the world should be ruled.
Reply to this comment
by n3td3v September 7, 2008 2:55 AM PDT
Google is a government black ops.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Ops
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo September 7, 2008 3:29 AM PDT
Google is evil.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo September 7, 2008 3:37 AM PDT
Google is evil.
Reply to this comment
by Migraine September 7, 2008 5:07 AM PDT
I can't belive you people! you want privacy move to the north pole!
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider September 8, 2008 12:27 AM PDT
*** are you babbling about?
by bullzeye1 September 7, 2008 5:27 AM PDT
Wow, a dot mil letting someone have "EXCLUSIVE" use. I hope they paid more money than the government for the satellite and rocket or this is a big misapplication of funds by the pentagon. The litmus test is whose money paid for what. If I were Getty, or Microsoft I would want lots of gov resources spent on my images also.

The military buying exclusive images from a private company is one thing, but a company buying exclusive from the government when even one taxpayer dollar is involved it weird.

Even if Geoeye was given some commercial incentives in the contract to cut overall cost of Rand D the deal sounds a little to sweet for Google. Maybe there is a time frame of exclusivity and then they go public???
Reply to this comment
by luney8 September 7, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
If you read the article again you will see that it is not a government satellite. It is a private company selling the rights to google and the goevernment. Geoeye is a private company.
by bullzeye1 September 7, 2008 5:52 AM PDT
Wow, a dot mil letting someone have "EXCLUSIVE" use. I hope they paid more money than the government for the satellite and rocket or this is a big misapplication of funds by the pentagon. The litmus test is whose money paid for what. If I were Getty, or Microsoft I would want lots of gov resources spent on my images also.

The military buying exclusive images from a private company is one thing, but a company buying exclusive from the government when even one taxpayer dollar is involved it weird.

Even if Geoeye was given some commercial incentives in the contract to cut overall cost of Rand D the deal sounds a little to sweet for Google. Maybe there is a time frame of exclusivity and then they go public???
Reply to this comment
by napacab September 7, 2008 8:54 AM PDT
Better stop using your credit cards too. And your cell phone. And your home phone. Only doctors that don't take medical insurance. And cancel your medical insurance. Use only snail mail and cash.

Good luck with your privacy.
Reply to this comment
by arcos37 September 7, 2008 9:17 PM PDT
What do you have to worry about when it comes to security and privacy. They have your number already!
What do you have to hide? It's just fear itself you have to be concerned about getting rid of. Of course the world is getting worse but will get better with supernatural intervention. Whose your protector? Jesus or your own will and self which is always on the defensive. You will always get yourself down. Try reading John in the Bible for escaping self and the enemy who is trying to invade your private lives!

fav site:
activated.org

eric
Reply to this comment
by PhaseDMA September 7, 2008 9:49 PM PDT
If they do lose exclusivity after a certain amount of time it won't matter. By that time Google will ink a new deal with better resolution.
Reply to this comment
by arttd September 8, 2008 2:08 AM PDT
Heheheeeee!!! I love it!
Conspiracy theorists unite!
I can smell the paranoia from here... Thorazine anyone? :o)
Reply to this comment
by knoufal October 8, 2008 5:23 PM PDT
I remember back late 90s whenever I hear microsoft is evil I used to say then wait for what coming next " Google" ... guess you can't be big without being evil , but I don't think it is bad thing google for me is a life a time saver use it 100s of time a day .

what privacy 'come on' there is no such a thing .... the minute you were born you already lost your privacy ...

after mapping earth google will be moving to mapping our DNA ... just wait
Reply to this comment
by hassan_bin_sober March 19, 2009 12:30 PM PDT
**** on the US government! The satellite does not belong to them.
Reply to this comment
by hassan_bin_sober March 19, 2009 12:32 PM PDT
Glad to see the profanity police are on the CNET job!
Reply to this comment
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right