• On CHOW: Groundbreaking hangover cure
August 29, 2008 7:27 AM PDT

Google to buy GeoEye satellite imagery

by Stephen Shankland
Google got a sponsor logo on the side of this rocket, set to launch the GeoEye-1 imaging satellite on September 4.

Google got a sponsor logo on the side of this rocket, set to launch the GeoEye-1 imaging satellite on September 4.

(Credit: GeoEye)

Google has signed a deal under which GeoEye will supply the search giant with imagery from a satellite due to launch in coming days, the companies said.

Under the deal, Google is the exclusive online mapping site that may use the imagery, said Mark Brender, vice president of corporate communications and marketing. Google uses satellite imagery in its Google Maps and Google Earth product.

And as a little icing on the cake, Google's logo is on the side of the rocket set to launch the 4,300-pound satellite in six days from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Terms of the deal weren't disclosed.

GeoEye-1 will orbit 423 miles above Earth, but it will be able to gather imagery with details the size of 41 centimeters, Brender said. Google, though, is permitted to use data only with a resolution of 50cm because of the terms of GeoEye's license with the U.S. government.

Each day, the satellite will be able to gather a high-resolution "pan-sharpened" format surface area equal to that of about New Mexico, the company said.

"The GeoEye-1 satellite has the highest ground resolution color imagery available in the commercial marketplace and will produce high-quality imagery with a very accurate geolocation," said Google spokeswoman Kate Hurowitz, adding that most commercial satellite imagery has a resolution of 60cm. "It is our goal to display high-resolution imagery for as much of the world as possible, and GeoEye-1 will help further that goal."

The Google-emblazoned rocket.

The Google-emblazoned rocket.

(Credit: GeoEye/ULA)

ITT built the imaging subsystem, and General Dynamics built the overall satellite, Brender said. GeoEye also contracted with ITT for the imaging in the GeoEye-2 satellite, due to launch in 2011 or 2012, Brender said. According to ITT, that satellite will have a resolution of 25cm, or about 9.75 inches.

Google's current imagery in Google Earth spans a range of resolution, the coarsest being 15 square meters per pixel, which is only good enough to see larger geographic features.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Digital Media
New Verizon ad pushes Droid's manly side
Judge bans Twitter from court
EA picks up Playfish for social gaming push
Google may lose WSJ, other News Corp. sites
GE, Comcast reportedly value NBCU at $30 billion
New preorders of Nook get later shipping date
Judge halts BlueBeat's sale of Beatles tunes
EMI to offer instant concert recordings
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Manhattan2 August 29, 2008 7:38 AM PDT
Satellite imagery is so 20th century. There is a better way to view planet earth. Sensible Ventures and the Manhattan 2 Project has it, and it may be flying over head or riding down your street right now.
Reply to this comment
by OldManCoyote1 August 29, 2008 7:24 PM PDT
Arrrggg!

You left out the most important fact (if it's available). How often will Google refresh it's imagery data base? Relatively frequent replacement with new imagery would make Google's data much more useful.
Reply to this comment
by webmasteh August 30, 2008 7:45 PM PDT
National Security Agency (http://www.nsa.gov/) and Information Awareness Office at DARPA (http://infowar.net/tia/www.darpa.mil/iao/) under the the Defense Intelligence Agency (http://www.dia.mil/) will not allow updated higher, nor allowable resolution images, nor updated in a timely interval other than assigned to contractors for global public use. Reason for this is to allow all agencies and government contractors to air-brush high risk security mapped areas in all North America's. Canada is a higher risk do to Canadian/American government facilities. Canada is more air-brush then American mappings. This is common public information, but you have to dig for it and many times over have to pay for the information since 911.
Reply to this comment
by bud_bud August 31, 2008 7:58 AM PDT
It will be interesting to see how quickly this new data propogates to Google Earth. There is already plenty of imagery that is better than this one pixel per 20 inches standard on Google Earth, most likely aerial photography donated by local land developers who want as many as possible to see the details of an area. But it would indeed be interesting if at least the entire US would be updated to this resolution within a month. I would bet against it.

Anyone reading know how often the sattelite actually passes an area, how long it would take for its orbits to stitch together into a seamless whole?
Reply to this comment
by targen September 2, 2008 5:35 PM PDT
webmasteh: I think much of this could be automated. If Google has a secrecy contract signed with these agencies (not saying they do), then I am sure that with a list of known areas to cover up they could simply supply older information or simply blur the locations. Alternatively the same result could be achieved by delegating the process to the NSA. Doing so could ensure that no image is more than a few weeks old, depending on atmospheric conditions. Probably the hardest task is to recognise cloud cover and those areas, in favour of non-cloud cover versions.
Reply to this comment
by Hypotenuse September 3, 2008 6:38 PM PDT
There is little or no impediment to GeoEye providing imagery with immediate turnaround...other than cost. Faster delivery = higher price. Since Google is notoriously aggressive in their valuations of imagery (another way to say !cheap!) and there really is no compelling day-to-day reason to have current data, it's unlikely you'll see much new data soon.

The width of the sensor swath is about 15km (~9.5mi) so it'll take a while to collect a seamless image map of the globe. A long while. Assuming clouds don't get in the way. Since they do, knock 60% off the acquisition rate for that, and another 50% off the acquisitions rate over time for a particular area unless you're going to pay extra for a custom collect.

Since Google is unlikely to pay the going rate for custom work (but the US government is, in some cases) you'll probably see Google 'filling in the gaps' for areas of interest around the world where airplanes haven't yet, or can't, fly. And leveraging the acquisitions for which others are paying 'full retail'
Reply to this comment
by mdwychoff October 8, 2008 10:38 PM PDT
The best satellite images also come in late winter/early spring when there is nothing (leaves/snow) on the ground and no leaves on the trees. The Google Maps and Google Earth images of my area of North America were taken in early to mid April. I can tell because forsythia is showing full yellow color, yet none of the trees have full leaves.
Reply to this comment
by buzzeit February 28, 2009 9:31 AM PST
Considered the world's most-accurate commercial imaging satellite, the GeoEye-1 had been undergoing calibration and inspection since it was launched on Sept. 6 from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
http://www.casino366.com/

A second satellite, GeoEye-2, slated to launch in 2011 or 2012, will have a resolution of 25 cm, company representatives promised. However, Google's satellite imagery will not likely get more detailed because of the 50-cm regulation.
Reply to this comment
by buzzeit February 28, 2009 9:35 AM PST
A second satellite, GeoEye-2, slated to launch in 2011 or 2012, will have a resolution of 25 cm, company representatives promised. However, Google's satellite imagery will not likely get more detailed because of the 50-cm regulation.(http://www.casino366.com/).
Reply to this comment
by Ed8r April 23, 2009 7:58 AM PDT
Meanwhile, some of my neighborhood is still over 1 year old . . . and this is not a remote area, either.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right