• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
August 7, 2008 9:20 PM PDT

Google sours on $1 billion AOL investment

by Steven Musil

Google acknowledged late Thursday that it may have made a bad bet on AOL.

The search giant said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that its $1 billion investment for a 5 percent stake in Time Warner's Web unit "may be impaired" and that it may have to take a charge in the future:

Based on our review, we believe our investment in AOL may be impaired...We will continue to review this investment for impairment in the future. There can be no assurance that impairment charges will not be required in the future, and any such amounts may be material to our Consolidated Statements of Income.

The December 2005 investment secured a renewal of Google's search advertising deal with AOL, preventing its largest ad partner from defecting to Microsoft. The deal gave AOL a valuation of $20 billion at the time.

Google didn't estimate in its filing what AOL might be worth today, but observers have suggested a figure closer to $10 billion.

Google's deal allows it to demand that Time Warner spin off AOL in an initial public offering of stock or buy back its stake, which would result in a $500 million loss for Google.

Time Warner, perhaps signaling its intention to dispose of AOL to focus on its media business, announced Wednesday that it will split AOL's dial-up unit from its advertising business by early 2009.

Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers. E-mail Steven.
Recent posts from Digital Media
New pre-orders of Nook get later shipping date
Judge halts BlueBeat's sale of Beatles tunes
EMI to offer instant concert recordings
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Jimmy Wales on what's next for Wikipedia
eBay's Skype sale gets go-ahead with settlement
No Doubt says 'no' to Band Hero depiction
Beatles copyright case down a legal rabbit hole
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by radixwebindia August 7, 2008 10:39 PM PDT
Thanks Steven Great Post.....

[Editor's note: Prohibited spam removed]
Reply to this comment
by jef5623 August 7, 2008 10:47 PM PDT
I think Google should wait and see how AOL enters into the 7th age of computing. Only then it can decide anything regarding the investment.
Reply to this comment
by CaptainMooseInc August 8, 2008 12:45 AM PDT
Wait to see how AOL enters the 7th age? AOL is dead. It was great while it lasted and it's definitely a service I'll never forget having. Just a few more years and you'll be seeing it on a VH1's Top 40.

AOL is the next Prodigy.
by benjaminstraight August 8, 2008 2:58 AM PDT
AOL is always a bad deal.
Reply to this comment
by zingerhill August 8, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
This investment should obviously be impaired now. AOL is clearly not worth $20 billion. I don't know how Google could not take the charge now.
Reply to this comment
by regulator1956 August 9, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
Proper accounting doesn't allow Google to wait. All significant assets must be always reviewed, and if impaired, written down to a reasonable estimate.

This includes investments like AOL.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right