Report from cop who slammed bicyclist posted online
Clarification: I mistakenly dropped a word when commenting on whether the officer made any hand gestures to signal the bicyclist to stop. The sentence should have read that the officer made no hand gestures.
Kudos to The Smoking Gun for posting a copy of the arrest report filed by New York City policeman Patrick Pogan.
He's the officer who a tourist videotaped body slamming a bicyclist in what appears to be an unprovoked attack last Friday. The case is rapidly playing out on YouTube, where the clip has been watched nearly 900,000 times since Sunday night, when it was posted.
This is why I love the Web and I respect The Smoking Gun. They get paper. Thesmokinggun.com is famous for posting copies of important documents before anybody. They let readers decide for themselves what people say by publishing court filings, e-mails and memos.
Most of the information in the copy of Pogan's sworn complaint has been reported but there's a couple things I haven't seen anywhere else. Pogan wrote "upon instructing the defendant to cease the above-described conduct..."
I've watched that video a dozen times and it's hard to see any evidence that Pogan said a word before driving his shoulder into the bicyclist. He certainly makes no hand gestures for the rider to stop.
Pogan says that the rider was obstructing vehicular traffic, and weaving "in and out" of the center lane "thereby forcing multiple vehicles to stop abruptly or change their direction in order to avoid hitting" the rider.
In the video, traffic already appears to be stopped as bicyclists, who were participating in Critical Mass, a monthly protest against the reliance on motor vehicles, ride past Pogan. The officer has been stripped of gun and badge until the conclusion of the investigation.
There's another little tidbit that didn't make its way into previous stories on the incident. In Pogan's report, right above the line where he is supposed to sign his name, is a sentence that reads: "False statements made herein are punishable as a class A misdemeanor."
Greg Sandoval covers media and digital entertainment for CNET News. He is a former reporter for The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. E-mail Greg, or follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/sandoCNET. 





where do you see a hand gesture???
Making hundreds of drivers in two-ton cars angry isn't the way to get respect - and I say this as a cyclist. Following the rules of the road and reporting people who break the law is a much better option. I can't even imagine how many hours of time - how many missed baseball games, appointments, dates, etc. Critical Mass has caused just in San Francisco - maybe it's time for them to try another tactic, because it seems like blocking traffic isn't working out too well.
You don't bike the the middle of a lane if you are smart. Can you, YES, should you, NO. Two tons vs 250 pounds, Auto wins every time. I bike, however defense is what saves your skin, not ticking off cars.
And this nazi pig is calling this justified?
I hope this nazi pig gets what's coming to him in prison. People like him give the police a very bad name.
I'm a cyclist also and these eco-terrorists are constantly getting themselves in trouble with the cops. You go on one of these rides, you should know the risk.
The only thing I can think is the guy said/did something that we can't see before Pogan slammed him to the ground; however, even if he did, short of verbally threatening the cop, Pogan had no right to do what he did. I can't believe he's still on desk duty and not suspended without pay.
Mark Heinemann
THEN, as Pogan is walking, he crosses his hands in front of him, like he is protecting his crotch. If you look carefully at his face, I don't see any indication of his lips moving. Saying, let alone shouting (as a police officer would have to do if the officer intends to be heard), the word 'STOP' would cause a definite movement of the lips and jaws.
The report authored by Pogan definitely does NOT describe what happened in the video.
Anyone wonder why people don't want to serve on juries when they see incidents like this, then have to rely on police reports to determine guilt or innocence?