• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
July 29, 2008 1:25 PM PDT

Click here for first-run movies, MPAA lawsuits

by Stefanie Olsen
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 8 comments

A week after the debut of The Dark Knight, Hollywood's big summer hit, the movie studios are taking aim at two small-potatoes Web sites that point people to pirated versions of first-run films such as the Batman thriller.

The Motion Picture Association of America on Tuesday said it has filed lawsuits against MovieRumor.com and Free Online Movie DataBase, or FOMDB, for violating studios' copyrights by providing links to pirated versions of their movies.

The suits, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, alleged that the sites are virtual clearinghouses for locating infringing copies of copyrighted films--and that they're profiting from the sale of advertising against those pirated movies as a result.

"There are many people operating illegal Web sites like these who are profiting from the theft of protected content," John Malcolm, director of worldwide antipiracy operations for the MPAA, said in a statement. "We have every intention of shutting down these, and sites like them, for good."

Requests for comment from MovieRumor and FOMDB were not immediately returned. According to measurement site Quantcast, MovieRumor attracted about 120,000 U.S. visitors in June, and FOMDB drew about 130,000 worldwide visitors in July.

A quick look at MovieRumor showed that viewers could watch The Dark Knight in five parts from a link on the front page. Downloading the film was slow, however, and a spyware warning popped up while it loaded.

The legal actions are part of an ongoing campaign by the Hollywood studios and representative MPAA to target large and small sites that allegedly foster film copyright violations. Since June 2007, the MPAA has filed seven lawsuits against similar sites, and in May, a Los Angeles judge awarded the lobbying group two multimillion-dollar judgments, respectively against Showstash.com and Cinematube.com.

The new civil lawsuits ask for damages and injunctive relief for violations under the United States Copyright Act of 1976.

Recent posts from Digital Media
Google Books settlement sets geographic, business limits
Medpedia to best the more democratic Wikipedia?
Running a contest on Facebook? That'll cost you
Google adds World Bank data to search results
iTunes music library makes its way to the browser
Convicted murderer sues Wikipedia under privacy law
Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices
Microsoft denies Windows 7 is based on Mac OS
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by raulmot July 29, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
Dear MPAA,

Thanks for the sites to check out. Their popularity should skyrocket as much as TPB now.
Reply to this comment
by rosscbrown July 29, 2008 3:02 PM PDT
Two new sites to check out tonight :-)
Reply to this comment
by blade2577 July 29, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
Seemed like FOMDB is down. That gives me MovieRumor to check.
Reply to this comment
by feliusrex July 29, 2008 4:06 PM PDT
Since when is linking to data the same as copying data? If the Content MafiAA is going to sue people for links, doesn't the same theory apply when they point out those links? Truthfully, the MPAA and RIAA should be sued out of existance just for being complete and utter asshats.
Reply to this comment
by unknown unknown July 29, 2008 4:26 PM PDT
Since congress has been corrupted by lobbyists and large corporate interests. They would rather do what's best for large campaign contributors than the country as the whole, hence the move to copyright extremism. Big copyright holders like movie studio practically wrote the DMCA and Sonny Bono Copyright Extension act, to name a few.
by umbrae July 30, 2008 6:44 AM PDT
"Since when is linking to data the same as copying data? If the Content MafiAA is going to sue people for links, doesn't the same theory apply when they point out those links? Truthfully, the MPAA and RIAA should be sued out of existance just for being complete and utter asshats."

Since courts ruled that "encouraging" copyright infringement made you responsible for the content. I am not sure this has worked against a website that has advertising, but that was the ruling that brought Grokster down.

Hopefully, they do not win; however, it is more likely these sites will be taken down before there is any court battle.
Reply to this comment
by goober_nut July 30, 2008 9:02 AM PDT
Are we going to get sued for watching the movies now?
Reply to this comment
by sunshinesuperman August 31, 2008 7:28 PM PDT
Truthfully, the MPAA and RIAA should be sued out of existance just for being complete and utter asshats.




that black monkey dancing rap crap should be sued out of business
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right